E9 E - Fit for English 10 – Expert transition
E9 E - Fit for English 10 – Expert transition
Mini-Beschreibung: Connect your full English 7/8/9 skill set and get ready for more independent reading, listening/viewing, discussion, writing, mediation and research in English 10. You work mainly in English, use support only when needed, revise your own work and finish with an individual transition profile.

English first → understand → respond → ask → hint → improve → use again.
This course is for Class 9, E-level, English as the first foreign language in Baden-Württemberg. It links the competence areas named in the official curriculum: listening/viewing, reading, speaking, writing, mediation, vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation/intonation and text/media competence. See: Englisch als erste Fremdsprache – Bildungsplan Baden-Württemberg.
Einleitung
You already know a lot of English. The next step is not “more difficult English” for its own sake. The next step is to work more independently: understand denser input, compare perspectives, ask spontaneous follow-up questions, select evidence, check sources, write coherent arguments and improve your own drafts.
Use English first. If something blocks understanding, use the smallest helpful support: context, a keyword, a sentence starter, a dictionary or a short German hint. Avoid full translations when you can understand the main idea without them.
Safety and privacy: Use fictional names, profiles and application data. Do not use private social-media data. Audio or video recordings are voluntary and should stay private unless a teacher-approved setting says otherwise. Do not upload classmates’ work, voices or images without permission. If you use AI tools, check facts, sources and feedback. Keep your own original text and your revision steps.
I-can goals
| I can ... | Expert-transition target |
|---|---|
| understand | follow the main idea, relevant details and speaker attitude in age-appropriate audio/video |
| read | skim, scan, infer meaning and track claims, evidence and perspectives |
| speak | discuss, present, react and ask spontaneous follow-up questions |
| write | build a coherent argument with evidence, linking and revision |
| mediate | pass on relevant information for a clear purpose and audience |
| research | search, compare, cross-check and document useful sources |
| use language | choose vocabulary and grammar because they help me express meaning |
| improve | use feedback, notice recurring errors and apply a better version in a new task |
Vorwissen aktivieren: Your 7/8/9 skill map
Take two minutes. For each line, give yourself one quick mark: secure – partly secure – needs practice.
| Skill area | Quick challenge |
|---|---|
| Listening / Viewing | Can you catch gist first and details second without stopping after every sentence? |
| Reading | Can you find a claim, its evidence and a contrasting viewpoint? |
| Speaking | Can you give a reason, react to another person and keep the conversation going? |
| Writing | Can you organise a paragraph with a clear focus and useful connectors? |
| Vocabulary | Can you paraphrase when one word is missing? |
| Grammar | Can you choose tense, modal, passive or conditional forms for a communicative purpose? |
| Media / Research | Can you tell where a claim comes from and whether another source supports it? |
Keep your weakest two areas in mind. You will return to them in the transition profile.
Media starter: Listen, react, extend
Watch the British Council video once without writing. Then watch again and collect three useful opinion phrases. Use them immediately in a 60-second partner exchange.
Prompt: “Which school activity teaches skills you will still use in five years?” Give a view, a reason, one example and one follow-up question.
Improve: Replace one simple phrase such as “I think” with a more precise phrase. Then use the improved phrase again in a new topic.
Listening and Viewing: From gist to evidence
For expert transition, do not try to understand every word. Build meaning in passes.
| Pass | Your job | Useful question |
|---|---|---|
| First viewing | gist | What is the main message? |
| Second viewing | evidence | Which example, fact or explanation supports it? |
| Third viewing | perspective | Who is speaking, for what purpose, and what may be missing? |
Viewing task: After “How to choose your news”, write a three-sentence response: main message → one supporting idea → one question you still have. Do not copy the transcript.
Stretch: Compare this advice with one other source. Note one point of agreement and one difference.
Reading: Track ideas, not just words

Use this reading routine:
| Move | What you do |
|---|---|
| Preview | title, source, date, image, text type |
| Skim | read for topic and line of argument |
| Scan | find names, examples, data or key terms |
| Trace | connect claim → evidence → explanation |
| Compare | identify another perspective or missing information |
| Respond | state what the text helps you understand and what still needs checking |
Mini-input:
A school media team wants to publish a weekly “one claim, two sources” post. Each post starts with a claim that students have seen online. The team checks the original source, compares it with an independent source and explains what can and cannot be concluded. The aim is not to tell readers what to think. The aim is to make the checking process visible.
Your response: What is the team’s purpose? Which step makes the project more reliable? What would you add before publication?
Kontextwortschatz: Build useful chunks
Learn words in combinations, not as isolated translations.
| Function | Useful English |
|---|---|
| make a point | claim, point out, argue that, suggest that |
| support a point | evidence, example, data, according to, this shows |
| compare | similarly, whereas, in contrast, both sources |
| qualify | partly, to some extent, may, seems to, likely |
| question | How do we know? What is the source? What is missing? |
| evaluate | reliable, relevant, balanced, limited, misleading |
| link ideas | however, therefore, in addition, as a result, on the other hand |
| repair speaking | Let me rephrase that. What I mean is ... Could you clarify ...? |
Use again: Choose four chunks and use them in one short paragraph or 90-second discussion turn.
Aussprache und Fluency: Be easy to follow

Your goal is intelligibility, not accent-free speech. Make your message easy to follow with thought groups, sentence stress, pauses and clear key words.
Try this fluency ladder:
| Round | Task |
|---|---|
| Round A | Speak for 30 seconds with notes. |
| Round B | Speak again with only five keywords. |
| Round C | Add one spontaneous example. |
| Round D | Answer one follow-up question without reading. |
If you lose a word, paraphrase. If you lose your line, use a repair phrase. Keep going.
Speaking: Discuss, present, respond
An E9-E discussion is not four mini-speeches. Build on each other.
| Move | Example |
|---|---|
| enter | I’d like to add something to that. |
| agree with precision | I agree with your main point, especially because ... |
| challenge respectfully | I see the point, but the source does not show ... |
| invite | What’s your view on the second example? |
| follow up | Why do you think that? / What would change your view? |
| summarise | So far, we agree on ..., but we still differ on ... |
Target task: In groups, discuss “Should every school project include a source-check step?” for 6–8 minutes. Each person must contribute a reason, refer to another speaker and ask at least one spontaneous follow-up question.
Presentation bridge: Prepare a 2–3 minute mini-presentation with a clear opening, two focused points, one source reference and a final takeaway. Then answer two questions.
Writing: Source-based and coherent

Strong writing is a process. Keep your original draft so you can see what you improved.
Writing frame for one argument paragraph:
| Part | Question |
|---|---|
| Point | What exactly do I claim? |
| Evidence | Which source detail supports the claim? |
| Explanation | How does the evidence support my point? |
| Perspective | Is there a limitation or contrasting view? |
| Link | How does this connect to my overall argument? |
Expert-transition task: Write 180–250 words on “Source checking should be part of normal school work.” Use at least two sources or provided source extracts. Include one contrasting perspective. Revise once for structure and once for language.
Revision rule: Do not replace your whole text with an AI-generated version. Keep your own wording, use feedback selectively and record two changes you made for a reason.
Mediation: Purpose before detail
Mediation is not word-for-word translation. Decide what the other person needs.
Situation: A German school notice explains rules for a student media project. An English-speaking exchange student asks what matters for participation.
| Step | Question |
|---|---|
| purpose | What does the person need to do? |
| select | Which details are relevant? |
| adapt | Which terms need a short explanation? |
| deliver | What is the clearest English for this audience? |
| check | Did I add information that was not in the source? |
Aim for a short, clear message. Leave out details that do not serve the purpose.
Functional grammar: Choose the form for the job
Grammar is a tool for meaning.
| Communicative job | Useful grammar | Example |
|---|---|---|
| report experience and result | present perfect / past simple | We have tested three sources. Yesterday we checked the original report. |
| focus on process or result | passive | The claim was shared without a source. |
| express possibility and advice | modal verbs | The post may be misleading. Readers should check the date. |
| discuss consequences | conditionals | If we compare sources, we can spot contradictions. |
| add precise information | relative clauses | The article, which was updated later, gives more context. |
| report ideas | reporting verbs | The author argues that ... / The report suggests that ... |
Error check: When a grammar form is wrong, ask first: “What meaning was I trying to express?” Then repair the form and use the repaired pattern in a new sentence.
Research and media checking

Research means more than collecting links. Use a short verification loop:
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Stop | Do not share or quote immediately. |
| Identify | Who created this? When? For what purpose? |
| Trace | Find the original claim, image, data or quotation. |
| Cross-check | Compare with an independent reliable source. |
| Use | Quote or paraphrase accurately and record the source. |
Lateral reading challenge: Open a second source before spending too long inside the first one. Check the organisation, author and claim outside the page itself.
Source question: A source can be useful for one purpose and weak for another. Instead of asking only “Is this source good?”, ask: “Good for what claim, for which audience, and compared with what?”
AI check: If an AI tool gives you a fact, quotation, source or correction, verify it independently. AI output is not a source by itself. Never send private class data to an external tool without an approved reason and permission.
Help levels: Use only what you need
| Level | Support |
|---|---|
| Hint 1 | Re-read or replay. Mark the exact point where meaning breaks. |
| Hint 2 | Use context, headings, keywords, visuals or a sentence starter. |
| Hint 3 | Check one key word or ask a focused question. |
| Hint 4 | Ask for a short German explanation of the difficult point, then return to English. |
Rule: After a hint, improve one part and use the improved language again.
Feedback and error analysis
Use feedback in this order: meaning → organisation → language → accuracy → polish.
| Code | Question |
|---|---|
| M = meaning | Is my point clear and supported? |
| O = organisation | Do ideas connect logically? |
| L = language | Is my vocabulary precise enough? |
| G = grammar | Does the form match the meaning? |
| P = pronunciation / punctuation | Is the message easy to follow? |
| S = source use | Can the reader see where information comes from? |
Keep a personal two-error pattern: choose two recurring problems, correct them, explain the rule in your own words and create a fresh example. Do not try to fix everything at once.
Transfer mission: One issue, several skills
Mission: “What change could improve learning at our school?”
Work with a fictional school context. Research two or three suitable sources, compare at least two perspectives and create:
| Product | Requirement |
|---|---|
| source note | 3 short entries: claim, evidence, reliability check |
| discussion | 6–8 minutes with spontaneous follow-up questions |
| mini-presentation | 2–3 minutes plus two questions |
| written argument | 180–250 words with one revision |
| optional mediation | short audience-focused summary for an exchange student |
No private social-media data. No real application profiles. Recordings are optional and private unless an approved task says otherwise.
Can-do check
Rate yourself 2 = secure, 1 = partly secure, 0 = next focus.
| Can-do | 0 / 1 / 2 | Evidence from this course |
|---|---|---|
| I can understand denser audio/video in more than one pass. | ||
| I can read for claims, evidence and perspective. | ||
| I can discuss and ask spontaneous follow-up questions. | ||
| I can present a clear line of thought and answer questions. | ||
| I can write a coherent source-based argument and revise it. | ||
| I can mediate for purpose and audience. | ||
| I can check sources and AI-supported information. | ||
| I can identify my own recurring language errors. |
Individual transition profile
Finish with your own profile. Keep it short, specific and evidence-based.
| My transition profile | My note |
|---|---|
| My strongest receptive skill | |
| My strongest productive skill | |
| One discussion strength | |
| One writing strength | |
| My two recurring language errors | |
| One research / media-check strength | |
| My next priority for English 10 | |
| One strategy that works for me | |
| One piece of evidence from this course |
Transition sentence: “For English 10, I am ready to ..., and my next step is to ... because ...”
Follow-up course: English 10 – more independent text, media, discussion, writing and research work.
Interaktive Aufgaben
Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen
What is the best first goal when watching a difficult English video? (Understand the main message) (!Translate every sentence) (!Write down every unknown word) (!Stop after each phrase)
What makes a discussion more interactive? (Referring to another speaker and asking follow-up questions) (!Reading a prepared speech without reacting) (!Repeating the same opinion) (!Avoiding questions)
What should evidence do in an argument? (Support a clear claim) (!Replace the claim) (!Make the text longer) (!Remove every other perspective)
What is lateral reading? (Checking information by opening and comparing other sources) (!Reading one page several times) (!Reading only the final paragraph) (!Translating a source line by line)
What is a good mediation strategy? (Select information for purpose and audience) (!Translate every word) (!Add your own facts) (!Ignore the receiver)
What is the main pronunciation goal in this course? (Be easy to understand) (!Sound exactly like one specific accent) (!Speak as fast as possible) (!Avoid all pauses)
What should you do with AI-provided facts or sources? (Check them independently) (!Treat them as automatically correct) (!Use them without reading) (!Delete your own draft)
What is a useful first step in revising a text? (Check whether the meaning and structure are clear) (!Replace every sentence) (!Change only the font) (!Add difficult words everywhere)
Why are connectors such as however and therefore useful? (They show relationships between ideas) (!They make every sentence formal) (!They replace evidence) (!They correct pronunciation)
What belongs in an individual transition profile? (Specific strengths, evidence and a next learning step) (!Only a final grade) (!A list of every vocabulary item) (!Private social-media data)
Memory
| claim | statement that needs support |
| evidence | information that supports a point |
| perspective | way of seeing an issue |
| mediation | purpose-based transfer of information |
| revision | improving a draft after feedback |
| fluency | speaking with a clear and manageable flow |
Drag and Drop
| Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu. | Thema |
|---|---|
| gist | first listening or viewing pass |
| evidence | support for a claim |
| cross-check | compare with an independent source |
| follow-up | question that develops a discussion |
| revision | improve structure and language after a draft |
Kreuzworträtsel
| evidence | What supports a claim with information or examples? |
| context | What helps you understand a word or statement around it? |
| revision | What process improves a first draft? |
| source | What should you identify before trusting a claim? |
| fluency | What describes a clear and manageable speaking flow? |
| mediation | What skill transfers relevant information for a new audience? |
LearningApps
Lückentext
Offene Aufgaben
Leicht
- Listening log: Watch one short English clip twice. Note the gist after round one and three useful details after round two.
- Vocabulary upgrade: Replace five basic words from one of your texts with more precise context-appropriate expressions and explain why each change helps.
- Follow-up questions: Write eight open follow-up questions for a class discussion, then test four of them with a partner.
- Error detective: Find two recurring errors in your own recent English work, correct them and create one new example for each pattern.
Standard
- Source triangle: Choose one non-sensitive school-related claim and compare the original source with two independent sources. Record agreements, differences and limits.
- Mini presentation: Prepare a 2–3 minute talk with two main points, one source reference and a short Q&A.
- Argument revision: Write 180–250 words, get feedback on meaning and organisation, revise the text and mark three purposeful changes.
- Mediation challenge: Turn a short German school notice into a concise English message for a fictional exchange student. Explain what you left out and why.
Schwer
- Perspective comparison: Compare two English texts or media items on the same issue. Analyse language, evidence, perspective and one important omission.
- Discussion chair: Moderate a 6–8 minute group discussion. Invite quieter voices, ask spontaneous follow-ups and summarise points of agreement and disagreement.
- Research brief: Produce a one-page English research brief from three suitable sources. Separate confirmed information, interpretation and open questions.
- Expert transition portfolio: Combine one listening/viewing note, one source check, one speaking reflection and one revised text. Use them to justify your individual English 10 transition profile.


Lernkontrolle
- Source-based response: Read two short texts about the same school-related issue. Explain where they agree, where they differ and which evidence each one uses. Do not rank them without a stated purpose.
- Viewing to discussion: Watch an age-appropriate English clip, summarise its central claim in two sentences and formulate two follow-up questions that would deepen a discussion.
- Writing transfer: Turn notes from a discussion into a coherent 180–250 word argument that includes evidence, a contrasting perspective and a revised conclusion.
- Mediation for audience: Select relevant points from a German information text for a fictional English-speaking student and justify two details you deliberately left out.
- Error analysis: Use a short sample of your own writing or speaking notes. Identify two repeated error patterns, explain how they affect clarity and demonstrate improved versions in a new context.
- Research decision: Given three web sources, explain which source you would use for which claim, what you would cross-check and what information remains uncertain.
Lernnachweis
- Receptive competence: Evidence that you can understand gist, relevant detail and perspective in reading and listening/viewing.
- Interactive speaking: Evidence that you can react, ask follow-up questions and maintain a discussion.
- Presentation: A structured 2–3 minute contribution plus spontaneous responses to questions.
- Writing: One coherent source-based text with visible revision.
- Mediation: One purpose- and audience-focused transfer task.
- Media and research competence: A documented source check with at least one cross-check.
- Language development: A short error-analysis record showing two recurring patterns and improved reuse.
- Transition profile: Specific strengths, evidence and one realistic next step for English 10.
OERs zum Thema
Weitere frei zugängliche Lernmedien im Kurs: Wikimedia Commons files are used through their file pages and licences; YouTube embeds come from educational channels such as British Council, TED-Ed and CrashCourse. For source checking, compare the video advice with the source page and with another independent source.
Verknüpfte Lernbereiche
aiMOOC-Projekte
MOOCwiki · Deutsch
Nach dem Lernen ist vor dem Lernen
Entdecke direkt den nächsten Lernkurs. Weitere Inhalte erscheinen, wenn Du weiter nach unten scrollst.
Zur MOOCwiki-HauptseiteJetzt üben: Can-do-Check, Portfolio and transition →Mediathek
Mediathek wird aus dem Wiki geladen ...
Keine passenden Inhalte gefunden. Bitte ändere Suche oder Filter.
NEWSLernweltNOAH fragen