Die Druckversion wird nicht mehr unterstützt und kann Darstellungsfehler aufweisen. Bitte aktualisiere deine Browser-Lesezeichen und verwende stattdessen die Standard-Druckfunktion des Browsers.

aiMOOC

ABI - Communicative strategies analysieren

QR-Code

Einleitung

ABI - Communicative strategies analysieren

This aiMOOC trains you to identify and analyse forms of address, statistics, references, quotations, examples and anecdotes in non-fictional texts and media. Your main question is never only What device is used? but What concrete communicative function does it have for this audience, in this context, for this purpose?

Target group: Basisfach (BF) and Leistungsfach (LF), English as a continued foreign language, Kursstufe Baden-Württemberg. The learning language is English first. German support is short and comes only after context, word formation, an English explanation and dictionary work.

No full compulsory texts or unauthorised film extracts are reproduced here. Practice data and practice quotations are fictional unless a source is explicitly named.

Medien-Einstieg

Look first, analyse second: Who is the speaker addressing? What relationship to the audience is being created? Which choices could make a message feel credible, urgent, personal or memorable?

Viewing task: Watch the TED-Ed video once for the main idea. On a second viewing, note two rhetorical choices and explain their likely function. Do not transcribe the video; short notes and paraphrases are enough.

I-can-Ziele

After this course, you can say:

I can identify communicative strategies precisely instead of calling everything a rhetorical device.
I can explain function by linking strategy, evidence, audience, context and purpose.
I can distinguish quantified evidence from narrative illustration.
I can question the source, framing and representativeness of statistics, references and anecdotes.
I can analyse the interaction of several strategies in one paragraph.
I can write or speak a focused analysis at BF level and extend it independently at LF level.

Abi 2027: official check

Stand of this aiMOOC: 02.10.2026.

For the 2027 Baden-Württemberg Abitur, the official English subject decree names the following examples under communicative strategies for non-literary texts: forms of address, statistics, references, quotations, examples and perspective, for example balanced or one-sided presentation.

Important nuance: anecdotes are not separately named in that official list. You should still analyse them when they are relevant because a short personal story can function as an example, testimony or emotional framing.

Area	BF	LF
Examination relevance	Analysis is one of the task types to be covered during the qualification phase; the Abitur examination is oral.	The written 2027 examination includes a writing part with analysis; communicative strategies can be an explicit analysis aspect.
Typical differentiation	More limited material, clearer scaffolds, exemplary analysis.	Greater breadth, depth, text complexity, independent material linking and stronger AFB II/III work.
Language target	B2, partly C1 as learning orientation.	B2, partly C1 as learning orientation, with greater analytical independence.

Official sources checked:

Vorwissen: 3-minute diagnostic

Without looking anything up, answer in English:

What is the difference between a feature and its function?
Why does a percentage not automatically prove a claim?
What can a direct quotation add that a paraphrase may not add?
When can a personal story be powerful but weak as general evidence?

If you cannot answer yet, that is your starting point.

English first: Kontextwortschatz und Wortbildung

Use this order: context → word family → English explanation → dictionary → short German emergency help.

Word family	English explanation	Context clue	Short German emergency help
address → addressee → direct address	language aimed explicitly at a reader or listener	“You can change this today.”	Anrede / direkte Ansprache
refer → reference	a link to another source, study, person, event or text	“According to the report ...”	Bezug / Verweis
quote → quotation	the exact words of another voice	“A student called the change ‘surprisingly helpful’.”	Zitat
persuade → persuasion → persuasive	to influence attitudes or action through reasons, framing or appeals	“The writer wants readers to support the proposal.”	überzeugen
illustrate → illustration → illustrative	to make an abstract idea clearer through a specific case	“For example ...”	veranschaulichen
anecdote → anecdotal	a short story about a specific experience or event	“Last year, I watched ...”	Anekdote
credible → credibility	appearing trustworthy and well-supported	“The named source strengthens credibility.”	Glaubwürdigkeit
represent → representative → representation	showing a wider group or pattern accurately	“One story may not be representative.”	repräsentativ

Dictionary task: Check one monolingual learner’s dictionary for address, reference, quotation, anecdote. Write one collocation for each.

The core analysis lens

A strong analysis usually follows this chain:

strategy → textual evidence → immediate effect → communicative function → audience/purpose/context

Avoid vague claims such as “This makes the text more interesting.” Be concrete.

Strategy	What to notice	Possible communicative functions	Critical question
Forms of address	you, we, vocatives, inclusive pronouns, direct questions	creates involvement, solidarity, responsibility, urgency or distance	Who is included or excluded by the address?
Statistics	percentages, ratios, trends, rankings, sample sizes	quantifies a claim, creates scale, supports comparison, can create an impression of objectivity	Source? Sample? Baseline? Time frame? Framing?
References	studies, experts, institutions, events, earlier texts	adds context, authority, intertextuality or credibility	Is the source relevant, reliable and represented fairly?
Quotations	exact words from experts, witnesses, opponents or affected people	imports another voice, adds testimony, authority, emotion or contrast	Why this speaker and why this quotation?
Examples	a specific case illustrating a broader point	makes an abstract claim concrete, accessible and memorable	Does the example illustrate or actually prove the broader claim?
Anecdotes	short personal or narrative episodes	humanises an issue, creates empathy, authenticity and memorability	Is a selected story being treated as representative evidence?
Perspective	balanced or one-sided presentation, counterarguments, omissions	frames how readers perceive fairness, complexity or urgency	Which viewpoints are foregrounded, reduced or absent?

Useful reminder: Audience, speaker/writer and purpose interact. A communicative strategy only has a meaningful function inside this rhetorical situation.

Reading: fictional practice text

All names, figures and sources in this practice text are fictional.

Friends, your next study break could be more useful than you think. In our fictional survey of 200 students, 68% said that a ten-minute quiet break helped them return to work with better focus. According to the imaginary School Learning Lab, short pauses can support concentration when they are planned rather than random. One student put it simply: “I came back less distracted.” For example, a class could schedule one screen-free pause during a long revision session. Last year, I watched a friend struggle through two hours of uninterrupted revision; after changing her routine, she said the work felt manageable. You do not need a perfect timetable. You need a pause you can actually keep.

Task A – BF scaffold: Mark one example of each relevant strategy. For three strategies, complete: The writer uses ... by ... This ... for the audience because ... Therefore, it supports the purpose of ...

Task B – LF extension: Analyse how at least four strategies interact. Add one sentence evaluating a limitation of the evidence or framing.

Micro-model, not an essay: “By addressing readers as ‘you’, the writer turns a general study tip into a personal responsibility, making the recommendation feel immediately applicable to a student audience.”

Forms of address: audience relationship

Compare:

A: “Students should consider shorter breaks.”

B: “You can test a shorter break today.”

Both communicate a similar idea, but B creates a more immediate relationship and assigns agency directly to the reader.

Function verbs: involve, include, challenge, reassure, mobilise, personalise, distance, position.

Mini-task: Rewrite B for three audiences: a close friend, a school principal and an unknown newspaper readership. Explain how the form of address changes.

Statistics: quantify, frame, question

Analysis rule: A statistic can support a claim, but it does not interpret itself.

Before explaining function, ask:

What exactly is measured?
Compared with what?
Who was included?
Who produced the data?
Is the visual scale fair?
Does the writer move from correlation to causation without enough evidence?

Fictional comparison:

“Attendance increased by 50%.” “Attendance increased from 2 students to 3 students.”

The first version sounds dramatic; the second reveals the baseline. Your analysis should identify this framing effect.

References and quotations: borrowed authority and borrowed voices

A reference can connect a claim to research or public knowledge. A quotation can make another voice directly present.

Do not write: “The quotation makes the text credible.”

Write more precisely: “By quoting a named specialist immediately after the central claim, the writer transfers some of the specialist’s authority to the argument and signals that the claim is externally supported.”

Source check: A prestigious name cannot rescue an irrelevant, outdated or misrepresented source.

Examples and anecdotes: concrete does not mean representative

An example shows what an abstract point could look like. An anecdote adds a short story, often with a person, sequence and emotional perspective.

Example function: clarification. Anecdote function: humanisation and narrative engagement.

Both can be memorable. Neither automatically establishes how common something is.

Quick contrast:

“Some students revise better with planned pauses. For example, one revision group schedules a ten-minute break.”

“On the night before her mock exam, Maya stared at the same paragraph for twenty minutes. A short walk finally reset her attention.”

The first illustrates. The second narrates and invites emotional identification.

Listening and Viewing

First viewing: Identify the speaker’s main purpose and target audience.

Second viewing: Note one appeal connected to credibility, one connected to reasoning and one connected to emotion. Then connect each to a concrete language or presentation choice.

LF extension: Explain why naming an appeal is not yet an analysis. Add the mechanism: how exactly does the choice shape audience response?

Analyse: what the 2027 operator requires

For Abitur tasks from 2027 onward, analyze / examine means more than identifying features. You need to:

describe the relevant feature accurately,
explain it in detail,
support your explanation with evidence from the text,
connect content with relevant aspects of language and form.

A useful paragraph pattern is:

Point → evidence → mechanism → function → link to purpose

Weak	Stronger
“The writer uses statistics to convince the reader.”	“The percentage presents the trend as measurable and widespread; placed before the recommendation, it gives the advice an evidence-based frame and prepares readers to accept the proposal.”
“The author uses an anecdote to create emotions.”	“The short first-person episode turns an abstract problem into an individual experience, encouraging readers to imagine its human impact before the writer returns to the broader argument.”

Speaking

Private speaking drill: Prepare a 60–90 second mini-speech recommending one harmless change to your study routine.

BF: use one form of address, one example and one statistic labelled clearly as fictional.

LF: use at least four strategies and then explain why you selected them for your chosen audience.

Recording is optional. If you record, keep the file private or local unless you deliberately choose to share it. No upload is required.

Writing

Mini-analysis prompt: Analyse how the writer of the fictional reading text above uses communicative strategies to make the recommendation accessible and persuasive.

BF structure:

Topic sentence: overall purpose and audience.
Strategy 1: evidence + function.
Strategy 2: evidence + function.
Strategy 3: evidence + function.
Brief conclusion.

LF extension: Analyse interaction, sequencing, framing and limitations. Connect at least one strategy to another instead of treating each feature in isolation.

Useful sentence frames:

Function	Sentence frame
address	“By addressing readers as ..., the writer positions them as ...”
statistics	“The figure quantifies ..., creating the impression that ...”
reference	“The reference to ... places the claim within ... and lends it ...”
quotation	“By giving ... a direct voice, the writer ...”
example	“The example translates the abstract claim into ...”
anecdote	“The anecdote personalises ... and invites readers to ...”

Optional Mediation

Fictional German source note:

“Bei einer schulinternen, nicht repräsentativen Testbefragung gaben 72 von 120 Teilnehmenden an, dass sie kurze Lernpausen hilfreich finden. Die Befragung wurde nur in zwei Kursen durchgeführt.”

Task: An English-speaking exchange student has seen only the headline “60% prefer short breaks”. In 70–90 words, explain in English what the figure means and which limitation should be kept in mind. Do not translate sentence by sentence; mediate the relevant information.

Hilfen und Differenzierung

Level	Support	Expected depth
BF	strategy checklist, sentence frames, limited materials, guided evidence selection	explain several clear strategy-function links accurately
LF	fewer prompts, more complex material, comparison of sources and perspectives	analyse interaction, framing, limitations and competing audience effects
B2 support	short paragraphs, transparent vocabulary, dictionary use, model sentence	precise explanation before stylistic sophistication
C1 orientation	nuanced verbs, qualification, counter-effects, independent synthesis	greater precision, complexity and critical distance

Help ladder:

First identify the strategy.
Then mark the exact evidence.
Ask what changes for this audience.
Link that change to the writer’s purpose.
Only then evaluate effectiveness or limitation if the task requires it.

Feedback: self-check

Before submitting an analysis, check:

Have I named the strategy precisely?
Have I used short, relevant evidence?
Have I explained a mechanism instead of claiming a vague “effect”?
Have I connected the feature to audience, purpose or context?
Have I distinguished illustration from proof?
Have I questioned source quality where statistics, references or anecdotes are involved?
Have I avoided writing a replacement essay for the source text?

Fehleranalyse

Common error	Why it is weak	Repair
“This makes the reader interested.”	too vague	name the exact audience response and why the feature triggers it
listing devices	identification without analysis	add mechanism and purpose
“Statistics prove ...”	data may be limited or framed	check source, sample, baseline and wording
“The author uses a quote because quotes are persuasive.”	circular explanation	identify whose voice is imported and what authority or contrast it creates
treating one anecdote as general evidence	poor representativeness	separate emotional illustration from population-level evidence
inventing intention	intention is often not directly knowable	write “functions to”, “can position readers to” or “supports the purpose of”

Transfer: two fictional materials

Material A: “You deserve a revision plan that fits real life. In our fictional sample of 150 learners, 96 said they preferred shorter study blocks.”

Material B: “A learner described her old routine as ‘a wall of work’. After splitting it into shorter blocks, she said she could finally see where to begin.”

BF task: Compare one strategy in A with one in B. Which different communicative function does each fulfil?

LF task: Analyse how quantification in A and testimony in B construct different kinds of credibility. Then assess what information would still be needed before drawing a general conclusion.

Quellen, KI und Datenschutz

Source literacy: Verify claims, publication dates, authorship, data basis and quotations before relying on them.

AI literacy: If you use AI independently for brainstorming or feedback, check every factual claim and source yourself and follow your school’s disclosure rules. Do not submit an AI-generated replacement essay as your own analysis.

Privacy: This course does not require external AI access. Practice data are fictional. Audio or video recording is voluntary and can remain private. Do not upload recordings, names, class data or other personal information unless you have deliberately chosen a lawful and appropriate sharing context.

Media rights: Wikimedia Commons files are embedded from their file pages; observe the licence information there when reusing them elsewhere. YouTube videos are embedded from the provider platform rather than copied.

Abi-Check

BF Abi-Check: Take five minutes to prepare a two- to three-minute spoken analysis of the fictional reading text. Explain two communicative strategies, give evidence and link each to audience and purpose. Finish with one limitation of the evidence.

LF Abi-Check: In 25 minutes, write a focused mini-analysis of the fictional reading text. Analyse at least three communicative strategies, their interaction and one aspect of framing or limitation. Use the 2027 meaning of analyze: evidence plus detailed explanation linked to language/form.

Final check: If you only name a feature, you are mostly in description. If you explain how it shapes the message for a specific audience and why that matters for the purpose, you are analysing.

Folgekurs

Continue with:

Interaktive Aufgaben

Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen

What is the strongest first step when analysing a form of address? (Identify who is being addressed and how the wording positions that audience) (!Count how many pronouns appear) (!Translate every pronoun into German) (!Assume every use of you is manipulative)

Why does a statistic not automatically prove a claim? (Its meaning depends on source sample baseline context and framing) (!Numbers are always subjective) (!Statistics cannot be used in non-fiction) (!Percentages are only decorative)

What can a reference to a reliable study do communicatively? (It can connect a claim to external evidence and strengthen credibility) (!It automatically makes the claim true) (!It replaces the need for analysis) (!It turns a text into fiction)

What is a possible function of a direct quotation? (It can bring another voice into the argument as testimony authority or contrast) (!It always proves the writer is neutral) (!It removes the need to identify the speaker) (!It has no effect unless it is very long)

What is the main analytical caution with an example? (It may illustrate a claim without proving how common the claim is) (!Examples are never relevant evidence) (!Examples must contain statistics) (!Examples can only appear in literary texts)

What is a typical communicative function of an anecdote? (It can humanise an issue and make it memorable through a short narrative) (!It guarantees representativeness) (!It replaces all quantitative evidence) (!It makes source checking unnecessary)

What does analyze require in the 2027 operator framework? (Describe and explain in detail using evidence and relevant aspects of language and form) (!List as many devices as possible) (!Give only your personal opinion) (!Retell the full text)

What best describes the BF and LF difference in this course? (BF uses more structure and limited material while LF expects greater depth breadth and independence) (!BF and LF require completely different communicative strategies) (!LF should use artificially difficult vocabulary) (!BF does not analyse non-fiction)

Which sentence gives the clearest communicative function? (The percentage frames the trend as measurable and widespread for the target audience) (!The writer uses a statistic) (!The statistic is interesting) (!The author wants to convince everyone)

Which statement matches the official 2027 Baden-Württemberg list most accurately? (Perspective is explicitly named while anecdotes are useful but not separately listed) (!Anecdotes are the only official strategy) (!Communicative strategies are not part of non-fiction analysis) (!Only quotations and statistics may be analysed)

Memory

Direct address	audience involvement
Statistics	quantified framing
Reference	external authority
Quotation	borrowed voice
Example	concrete illustration
Anecdote	narrative humanisation
Perspective	balanced or one-sided framing

Drag and Drop

Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu.	Thema
Direct address	positions the audience explicitly
Statistics	quantifies a claim
Quotation	imports another voice
Example	makes an abstract idea concrete
Anecdote	turns an issue into a short narrative

Kreuzworträtsel

Audience	Who receives and interprets the message?
Statistics	Which strategy uses numerical data to quantify a claim?
Quotation	What brings exact words from another voice into a text?
Anecdote	What short narrative can humanise an issue?
Evidence	What should support an analytical claim?
Credibility	What quality can a relevant reliable source strengthen?

LearningApps

Lückentext

Offene Aufgaben

Leicht

Audience hunt: Find five different forms of address in short non-fictional texts and explain who is positioned as the addressee.
Data caption: Create two captions for the same fictional statistic, one neutral and one dramatic, then explain the framing difference.
Voice map: Take three invented quotations from different speakers and note what each voice could contribute to credibility, emotion or contrast.
Example or evidence: Write four short examples and decide whether each only illustrates a claim or could support a broader conclusion.

Standard

Micro-story: Write a four-sentence fictional anecdote for a school-related issue, then annotate its intended communicative function.
Strategy paragraph: Analyse three communicative strategies in the fictional reading text using point, evidence, mechanism, function and purpose.
Mediation note: Use the fictional German survey note from this course and write a concise English explanation of its meaning and limitation.
Private speaking drill: Deliver a 90-second speech using three strategies; recording is optional and may remain local and private.

Schwer

Framing comparison: Compare two reputable non-fictional texts on the same non-political topic and analyse how their statistics, quotations or examples frame the issue differently.
Source audit: Trace one statistic from a published article back to its original source and document what changed between source and article.
BF-LF redesign: Turn a guided BF analysis task into an LF task by increasing material breadth, analytical independence and AFB II/III demands without making the language artificially difficult.
Abi simulation: Create a 180-word fictional non-fiction text containing at least five communicative strategies, exchange it with a partner and write a timed analysis. Do not use personal data.

Lernkontrolle

Function chain: Given a new non-fiction paragraph, select three communicative strategies and explain the full chain from evidence to audience effect and purpose.
Evidence quality: Compare a statistic, an anecdote and an expert quotation supporting the same claim. Explain what each can and cannot establish.
Perspective: Analyse how including or excluding a counterargument changes the communicative effect of a text.
Audience shift: Rewrite the same message for two audiences and explain why the forms of address, examples and references should change.
Repair task: Improve three weak analytical sentences such as “This is persuasive” by adding mechanism, audience and purpose.
BF-LF transfer: Explain how the same source could be used for a scaffolded BF oral analysis and for a more independent LF written analysis.

Lernnachweis

For a strong learning record, you should be able to:

identify forms of address, statistics, references, quotations, examples, anecdotes and perspective,
explain a concrete communicative function with short textual evidence,
connect strategy to audience, purpose and context,
distinguish illustration from generalisable evidence,
question sources, samples, baselines, quotations and representativeness,
use the 2027 operator analyze accurately,
adapt your analysis to BF or LF expectations,
speak or write independently rather than producing a replacement essay,
document any independent AI use according to school rules and verify all factual claims and sources.

OERs zum Thema

Verknüpfte Lernbereiche

Communicative strategies

aiMOOC-Projekte

Frag mich zum aktuellen Lerninhalt oder wähle eine kurze Hilfe.

Textmodus bereit

Sprache