E9 M - Discuss a current issue neutrally and respectfully
E9 M - Discuss a current issue neutrally and respectfully

Mini-description: Discuss an age-appropriate controversial issue with several evidence-based perspectives. Listen carefully, react respectfully and explain your own view with reasons.
Class: 9 · Level: M · English: first foreign language · Target: B1-oriented
Current issue in this course: Should smartphones be restricted during the school day?
Einleitung
You will work in English first. You do not need to understand every word. Use context, key words and evidence.
Learning route: English first → understand → respond → ask → hint → improve → use again.
The goal is not to find one “correct” opinion. Your goal is to understand different views, check evidence and discuss the issue respectfully.
Deutsch-Hilfe
Du sollst nicht jedes Wort übersetzen. Achte zuerst auf Hauptaussage, Gründe, Beispiele und Quellen. Formuliere danach auf Englisch weiter.
I can ...
| I can ... | Check |
|---|---|
| understand the main points of a short news video about school phone rules | □ |
| identify facts, opinions and evidence | □ |
| agree, partly agree or disagree politely | □ |
| ask follow-up questions | □ |
| explain my own position with reasons and examples | □ |
| write a coherent short opinion text | □ |
Activate your knowledge
Look at the image. Think for 30 seconds.

- First reaction: Say one possible benefit and one possible problem of smartphones at school.
- Key question: What is the difference between a total ban and a restriction?
- Evidence check: Which information would you need before making a strong claim?
Useful starters: One possible benefit is ... · A problem could be ... · I would need evidence about ...
Listening and Viewing
Watch the BBC Newsround video above once without stopping.
First viewing: What is the main issue?
Watch again.
| Listen for ... | Your note |
|---|---|
| What rule is discussed? | ... |
| Who can decide details? | ... |
| What possible ways of limiting phone use are mentioned? | ... |
Respond: Give a 30-second summary in your own words.
Ask: Ask a partner one follow-up question, for example: What would this rule change for students?
Hint: Listen for stressed content words, not every word.
Language for respectful disagreement
BBC Learning English shows ways to disagree without attacking the other person.
Try these chunks:
| Function | Useful English |
|---|---|
| agree | I agree because ... |
| partly agree | I see your point, but ... |
| disagree politely | I am not sure I agree because ... |
| ask for evidence | What evidence supports that? |
| clarify | Do you mean that ...? |
| build on an idea | I would add that ... |
Use again: Choose two phrases and use them in the speaking task later.
Reading: Three evidence-based perspectives

Question: Should smartphones be restricted during the school day?
Perspective A – stronger restrictions: Digital devices can distract students. In PISA 2022, about 30% of students across OECD countries said they were distracted by digital devices in most or every mathematics lesson. OECD analysis also reports that school phone bans can reduce distraction, although enforcement matters.[1][2]
Perspective B – controlled educational use: Phones can also support learning when teachers use them for a clear purpose. OECD data distinguish between learning use and leisure use, and the results suggest that purpose and classroom management matter.[3]
Perspective C – mixed evidence: A large 2026 U.S. study of strict lockable-phone-pouch policies found a strong reduction in school-day phone use, but average effects on test scores were close to zero. Student well-being fell in the first year and later recovered, while disciplinary effects faded over time.[4]
UNESCO reported in March 2026 that 114 education systems had national school-phone bans. The report also stresses that restrictions do not replace digital literacy and critical thinking.[5]
Reading strategy: Mark each sentence as fact, interpretation or opinion.
Deutsch-Hilfe
restriction = Einschränkung · evidence = Beleg/Evidenz · enforcement = Durchsetzung · well-being = Wohlbefinden · mixed evidence = gemischte Befundlage
Source check
Use this quick test:
| Question | Check |
|---|---|
| Who published it? | source |
| When was it published? | date |
| What population was studied? | group |
| Is it a fact, result or opinion? | type |
| Does another reliable source support or challenge it? | comparison |
Do not treat one study as proof for every school. Context matters.
Context vocabulary
| Word / phrase | Meaning in this topic | Example |
|---|---|---|
| restriction | a rule that limits use | A restriction is not always a total ban. |
| distraction | something that takes attention away | Notifications can be a distraction. |
| evidence | information used to support a claim | The speaker gives evidence from a study. |
| viewpoint | a way of seeing an issue | We compared three viewpoints. |
| compromise | a solution between different positions | A compromise could allow phones only for learning. |
| reliable | trustworthy | Check whether the source is reliable. |
| claim | a statement that may need evidence | The claim needs a source. |
| consequence | a result of an action | One consequence could be less distraction. |
Pronunciation and Fluency
Aim for clear speech, not accent-free speech.
Say these thought groups with short pauses:
I see your point / but the evidence is mixed.
In my view / the rule should be clear / because ...
What evidence / supports that claim?
Fluency tip: Stress the key words: view, evidence, mixed, reason, example.
Record yourself only if you want to. Keep recordings private unless you have clearly chosen another safe setting. Do not upload classmates or other people without permission.
Speaking: Mini discussion

Work in groups of three. The profiles below are fictional.
| Role | Starting point |
|---|---|
| Alex | wants stronger restrictions because lessons should have fewer distractions |
| Jamie | wants controlled phone use because phones can support learning and accessibility |
| Robin | wants a compromise with phone-free phases and teacher-approved learning use |
Round 1 – understand: Each person speaks for 30 seconds.
Round 2 – respond: React to one idea before giving your own.
Round 3 – ask: Ask one genuine follow-up question.
Round 4 – evidence: Add one source-based fact from the reading.
Round 5 – improve: Replace one weak sentence such as That is wrong with a respectful phrase.
Round 6 – use again: Switch roles and discuss for two more minutes.
Functional grammar for discussion
Use grammar to make your ideas precise.
| Function | Structure | Example |
|---|---|---|
| give a cautious opinion | may / might / could | A ban might reduce distraction. |
| give advice | should / should not | Schools should explain the rule clearly. |
| compare | whereas / while | A ban removes access, whereas a restriction limits it. |
| give a condition | if + present, will / can | If phones are allowed for learning, teachers can set clear times. |
| connect reasons | because / therefore / however | Phones can help learning. However, they can also distract. |
Accuracy focus: Do not write I am agree. Write I agree.
Help levels
Help 1 – sentence starters: I think ... because ... · I see your point, but ... · One source says ... · Could you explain ...?
Help 2 – planning frame: claim → reason → evidence/example → response to another view.
Help 3 – challenge: React spontaneously without reading a full script.
Deutsch-Hilfe
Wenn du festhängst: Formuliere zuerst nur Position + Grund. Ergänze danach einen Beleg oder ein Beispiel und reagiere auf die andere Person.
Writing
Write 120–160 words for a class blog:
Should smartphones be restricted during the school day?
Include:
- a clear position
- at least two reasons
- one piece of evidence from a named source
- one fair reference to another viewpoint
- a short conclusion
Keep your own draft. If you use AI feedback, compare it with your original text. Check facts, sources and suggestions yourself. Do not replace your own work blindly.
Feedback and improve
Use this peer-feedback grid.
| Check | Yes / not yet |
|---|---|
| The position is clear. | ... |
| Reasons are explained. | ... |
| Evidence is linked to a source. | ... |
| Another viewpoint is treated fairly. | ... |
| Linking words make the text coherent. | ... |
| The tone is respectful. | ... |
Improve: Change two sentences after feedback, but keep the original version too.
Error analysis
Find and improve the problem.
| Draft sentence | Better version |
|---|---|
| I am agree with a ban. | I agree with a ban. |
| Phones are bad, everyone knows it. | Phones can cause problems; for example, they may distract students. |
| This study proves bans always work. | This study suggests a possible effect in its specific context. |
| You are wrong. | I see your point, but I interpret the evidence differently. |
Explain why the improved version is more accurate or respectful.
Mediation
An English-speaking exchange student asks about a school notice. Explain the main information in 4–5 English sentences. Do not translate word for word.
German source text
Schulhinweis: Private Smartphones bleiben während des Unterrichts grundsätzlich in der Tasche. Die Lehrkraft kann sie für eine konkrete Lernaufgabe erlauben. Medizinisch notwendige Nutzung ist nach Absprache möglich. In den Pausen gelten die Regeln der Schule.
Your mediation should answer: What is allowed? What is limited? Are there exceptions?
Transfer

Compare two possible school rules without choosing for the whole class:
Rule A: Phones stay away for the whole school day.
Rule B: Phones stay away during lessons but can be used in defined situations.
Discuss:
- Which problems does each rule try to solve?
- Which new problems could each rule create?
- What evidence would help a school evaluate the rule?
Can-do check
| I can ... | not yet | mostly | confidently |
|---|---|---|---|
| understand the main point of a short authentic video | □ | □ | □ |
| distinguish fact from opinion | □ | □ | □ |
| disagree politely | □ | □ | □ |
| ask for clarification or evidence | □ | □ | □ |
| support my view with reasons and a source | □ | □ | □ |
| write a coherent B1-level opinion | □ | □ | □ |
Next course: Negotiate a fair class agreement.
Interaktive Aufgaben
Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen
What is the main communication goal of this course? (Discuss an issue respectfully and support ideas with reasons) (!Win every discussion) (!Avoid all disagreement) (!Translate every English word into German)
Which phrase shows polite disagreement? (I see your point, but I am not sure I agree.) (!That is nonsense.) (!You are completely wrong.) (!Stop talking.)
What does evidence do in a discussion? (It supports or challenges a claim) (!It makes every opinion automatically true) (!It replaces listening) (!It ends all debate)
What did OECD data show about digital distraction? (About 30 percent reported distraction in most or every mathematics lesson) (!No students reported distraction) (!All students were distracted in every lesson) (!Only teachers used digital devices)
Why is the evidence about phone restrictions described as mixed? (Different studies and outcomes show different effects) (!There are no studies) (!Every study reaches exactly the same result) (!Phones have no educational use)
Which sentence makes a cautious claim? (A restriction might reduce distraction.) (!A restriction always solves every problem.) (!This proves everything.) (!Nobody can disagree.)
What is a compromise? (A solution between different positions) (!A personal attack) (!A total refusal to listen) (!A source without evidence)
What should you do before using a strong factual claim? (Check the source and context) (!Repeat it louder) (!Remove the date) (!Ignore the population studied)
Which structure is useful for a short argument? (Claim reason evidence response) (!Insult repetition volume silence) (!Translation translation translation translation) (!Question without answer or reason)
What is the course goal for pronunciation? (Clear understandable speech) (!Perfect imitation of one accent) (!Speaking as fast as possible) (!Avoiding all pauses)
Memory
| evidence | information that supports a claim |
| viewpoint | a way of seeing an issue |
| compromise | a solution between positions |
| distraction | something that takes attention away |
| reliable | trustworthy |
| restriction | a rule that limits use |
Drag and Drop
| Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu. | Thema |
|---|---|
| claim | a statement that needs support |
| reason | explains why you think something |
| evidence | supports or challenges a claim |
| counterpoint | shows another perspective |
| conclusion | brings the argument together |
Kreuzworträtsel
| Evidence | What supports a factual claim? |
| Viewpoint | What word means a way of seeing an issue? |
| Respect | What helps people disagree without attacking each other? |
| Compromise | What is a solution between different positions? |
| Source | What should you check before trusting a factual claim? |
| Distract | What verb means to take attention away? |
LearningApps
Lückentext
Offene Aufgaben
Leicht
- Opinion line: Place yourself on an imaginary line from “strong restriction” to “few restrictions” and explain your place in two English sentences.
- Phrase cards: Create six cards with respectful discussion phrases and one example for each.
- Source detective: Choose one factual claim from the reading and identify publisher, date, population and result.
- Listening note: Watch one embedded video again and write five key words instead of full sentences.
Standard
- Mini debate: Discuss the smartphone question for three minutes and use at least three response phrases.
- Balanced paragraph: Write one paragraph that presents two different perspectives fairly before giving your own view.
- School survey: Design an anonymous five-question class survey about phone use without collecting names or private social-media data.
- Mediation task: Explain the German school notice to a fictional English-speaking student in your own English words.
Schwer
- Evidence comparison: Compare one OECD finding with one 2026 research finding and explain why they do not answer exactly the same question.
- Policy prototype: Draft two alternative school-phone rules and list possible benefits, risks and exceptions for each without declaring a winner.
- Moderated discussion: Lead a five-minute group discussion, invite quieter speakers in and summarise points of agreement and disagreement.
- Fact-check project: Find one new source, check its publisher, date, method and limits, and present what it can and cannot support.


Lernkontrolle
- Evidence and context: Explain why a result from one country or school system cannot automatically be transferred to every school.
- Neutral comparison: Compare a total ban with a limited-use rule using two benefits and two possible problems for each.
- Language choice: Rewrite three aggressive disagreement sentences so that they remain clear but become respectful.
- Source reasoning: Decide which information you need before trusting a claim about school phone rules and justify your choices.
- Transfer discussion: Apply the discussion structure to a different age-appropriate issue such as school uniforms or homework limits.
- Reflection: Explain how listening to another viewpoint changed, strengthened or refined your own reasoning.
Lernnachweis
For a successful learning record, show that you can:
- understand a short authentic input and identify its main message
- separate fact, interpretation and opinion
- use respectful B1-level discussion language
- ask follow-up and clarification questions
- support your own position with reasons and checked evidence
- refer fairly to another viewpoint
- write a coherent short opinion text
- reflect on feedback and improve your own text while keeping the original
No external media, uploads or AI tools are required for the learning record.
OERs zum Thema
Weitere geprüfte Quellen
- UNESCO Global Education Monitoring Report, 2026
- OECD PISA 2022 Results, Volume II
- Stanford SIEPR, 2026
- Bildungsplan Baden-Württemberg – Englisch als erste Fremdsprache, Klassen 7/8/9
Medienkompetenz und Sicherheit
Use media actively, but safely.
- Privacy: Do not use private social-media data of real people for tasks.
- Fictional data: Use fictional names and profiles where examples are needed.
- Recordings: Audio or video recordings are voluntary and should stay private unless everyone involved has clearly agreed.
- AI check: Check AI-generated facts, sources and feedback before using them.
- Own work: Keep your own drafts so that revisions remain visible.
- No automatic upload: Do not upload recordings, personal texts or images to external AI services without an explicit safe classroom decision.
Verknüpfte Lernbereiche
aiMOOC-Projekte
MOOCwiki · Deutsch
Nach dem Lernen ist vor dem Lernen
Entdecke direkt den nächsten Lernkurs. Weitere Inhalte erscheinen, wenn Du weiter nach unten scrollst.
Zur MOOCwiki-HauptseiteMediathek
Mediathek wird aus dem Wiki geladen ...
Keine passenden Inhalte gefunden. Bitte ändere Suche oder Filter.
NEWSLernweltNOAH fragen