Conflict and Peace Studies

Introduction

Conflict and Peace Studies is an interdisciplinary field that examines why conflicts emerge, how violence escalates or declines, how wars end, and how societies can build more just and durable forms of peace. It draws on Political science, International relations, Sociology, History, Law, Economics, Psychology, Anthropology, Development studies, and Gender studies.

As a university learner, you will move between theory and practice. You will learn to define and measure conflict carefully, analyze actors and structures, compare explanations, evaluate peace interventions, and design evidence-informed responses. The field does not assume that every disagreement is harmful. Conflict can reveal incompatible interests, injustice, exclusion, or demands for change. The central challenge is to understand when and why conflict becomes destructive and how it can be transformed without reproducing harm.

The Peace Palace in The Hague symbolizes the effort to replace violent confrontation with institutions of international law, arbitration, and adjudication.

This United Nations video introduces Sustainable Development Goal 16 and connects peace with justice, inclusion, accountable institutions, and access to justice.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this aiMOOC, you should be able to explain major concepts in conflict and peace studies, distinguish competing theoretical approaches, build a conflict analysis, assess prevention and peacebuilding strategies, evaluate evidence, and transfer these tools to unfamiliar cases.

You should also be able to discuss ethical tensions in peace interventions. These include questions about sovereignty, local ownership, civilian protection, justice, amnesty, inclusion, power asymmetries, and the unintended effects of external assistance.

Core Concepts

Conflict, Violence, and War

A conflict exists when actors perceive goals, interests, values, identities, needs, or claims as incompatible. Conflicts can occur within people, between individuals, among social groups, within states, or between states. Some conflicts remain latent, institutionalized, negotiated, or nonviolent; others escalate into coercion and organized violence.

Violence is narrower than conflict. Direct violence includes physical attacks, killing, torture, and destruction. Many scholars also study structural conditions that systematically expose groups to deprivation or unequal life chances, and cultural narratives that can normalize domination or exclusion. These concepts are analytically useful, but you should define them precisely rather than treating every inequality as the same type of violence.

War and armed conflict are operationalized differently across research projects and legal frameworks. The Uppsala Conflict Data Program, for example, defines state-based armed conflict using a contested incompatibility over government or territory, armed force involving at least one state government, and a threshold of at least 25 battle-related deaths in a calendar year. Operational definitions make comparison possible, but every threshold also excludes some forms of harm.

Negative Peace and Positive Peace

Negative peace usually refers to the absence or substantial reduction of direct organized violence. A ceasefire may therefore produce negative peace even when distrust, exclusion, displacement, impunity, or institutional weakness remain.

Positive peace asks about the conditions that make peaceful relations sustainable. Depending on the theoretical tradition, these conditions can include legitimate institutions, fair access to opportunities, constructive relationships, political participation, human rights, social trust, and mechanisms for resolving disputes without violence.

The distinction is useful because ending fighting and building a durable peace are related but different tasks. A peace agreement can stop a war without settling every grievance, and ambitious reform can destabilize a fragile settlement if timing, capacity, and political consent are ignored.

Human Security

Traditional security studies often focus on states, military threats, and territorial integrity. Human security shifts attention toward the security of people and communities. It can include protection from political violence as well as threats linked to food, health, livelihood, displacement, environmental stress, and personal safety.

A human-security lens does not eliminate questions of state security. Instead, it asks you to examine how state, community, and individual security interact, and whether policies that protect one level may create risks at another.

Theoretical Approaches

Realist and Strategic Approaches

Realist and strategic approaches emphasize power, security competition, deterrence, alliances, uncertainty, and the problem of credible commitments. They are especially useful when actors fear that rivals may exploit restraint. A key question is whether institutions or agreements can reduce uncertainty enough for cooperation to become rational.

At the same time, strategic models can become too narrow if they treat identity, legitimacy, domestic politics, historical memory, or moral commitments as secondary. A strong analysis therefore asks what the model illuminates and what it leaves out.

Liberal and Institutionalist Approaches

Liberal and institutionalist approaches examine how institutions, interdependence, law, democratic accountability, and repeated cooperation can reduce incentives for violent conflict. International organizations can provide information, monitoring, forums for negotiation, and mechanisms for coordinating collective action.

Institutions are not automatically neutral or effective. Their design reflects power, their rules may be contested, and compliance depends on incentives, legitimacy, capacity, and political support.

Constructivist Approaches

Constructivist approaches focus on how identities, norms, narratives, categories, and shared understandings shape political action. Interests are not always fixed in advance; they can change as actors reinterpret who they are, what they value, and what behavior they consider legitimate.

This perspective helps you study enemy images, nationalism, reconciliation, norm diffusion, and the transformation of relationships. It also encourages careful attention to language and framing.

Critical, Feminist, and Postcolonial Approaches

Critical approaches ask whose knowledge counts, who defines security, and how global and local power structures shape both conflict and peace interventions. Feminist scholarship has shown that war and peace are experienced differently across gendered social positions and that formal peace agreements can miss everyday insecurity. Postcolonial approaches examine how histories of empire, racial hierarchy, borders, extraction, and external intervention continue to shape present conflicts and peace practices.

These approaches are not one unified theory. Their shared contribution is to challenge apparently neutral categories and to make power, representation, and exclusion central analytical questions.

Conflict Analysis

Actors, Positions, Interests, and Relationships

A useful conflict analysis begins by identifying relevant actors. These may include governments, armed organizations, political parties, businesses, community groups, religious authorities, social movements, diasporas, international organizations, and affected civilian populations.

Positions are what actors publicly say they want. Interests are the underlying goals or concerns that may motivate those positions. Needs can refer to fundamental concerns such as security, recognition, identity, livelihood, or political participation. Mapping these layers helps you see whether apparently incompatible positions hide areas of possible agreement.

Relationships matter as much as actor attributes. Ask who communicates with whom, where trust exists, who can block a settlement, who can bridge communities, and whose voice is absent from formal negotiations.

Context, Drivers, Triggers, and Dynamics

A rigorous analysis distinguishes long-term structural conditions from shorter-term triggers. Potential drivers can include political exclusion, state repression, institutional weakness, corruption, economic shocks, horizontal inequalities between groups, land disputes, competition over resources, organized crime, external support for armed actors, or unresolved legacies of earlier violence.

No single factor causes conflict mechanically. Similar conditions can produce different outcomes in different places. You should therefore look for combinations of factors, feedback loops, actor choices, and pathways of escalation.

Triggers are events that rapidly change perceptions, opportunities, or constraints. Examples include a disputed election, an assassination, a sudden economic crisis, a provocative security operation, or the collapse of negotiations. A trigger matters because it interacts with pre-existing vulnerabilities.

Conflict Trees, Timelines, and Stakeholder Maps

A conflict tree separates root causes, a central problem, and visible consequences. A timeline helps you identify turning points and competing interpretations of history. A stakeholder map represents actors, relationships, influence, interests, and possible connectors.

These tools do not produce objective truth automatically. Their value depends on whose evidence is included, how categories are defined, and whether the analysis is revised when conditions change.

Escalation, De-escalation, and Nonviolent Action

Escalation can be driven by fear, retaliation, polarization, misinformation, dehumanization, organizational incentives, or security dilemmas. De-escalation often requires credible communication, restraint, verification, third-party guarantees, or changes in the cost-benefit calculations of key actors.

Nonviolent action includes strikes, boycotts, demonstrations, civil disobedience, noncooperation, and the creation of alternative institutions. It is not simply passivity. Strategic nonviolent movements often seek to shift loyalties, legitimacy, participation, and the willingness of institutions to enforce existing power arrangements.

The 1930 Salt March in British India is a widely studied example of nonviolent civil disobedience. It can be analyzed not only as a moral symbol but also as a strategy of mobilization, rule-breaking, publicity, and political pressure.

Historical footage can help you examine how movement participation, symbolism, leadership, and public visibility interact.

Images of people on the Berlin Wall in 1989 invite questions about mass mobilization, regime legitimacy, external context, and the difference between a dramatic turning point and the longer processes that made change possible.

Conflict Prevention and Early Warning

Conflict prevention aims to keep disputes or rising tensions from escalating into large-scale violence. Preventive practice can include diplomacy, mediation, confidence-building measures, security-sector reform, human-rights monitoring, development policy, targeted incentives, and support for inclusive political processes.

Early warning systems combine indicators, qualitative reporting, local knowledge, and scenario analysis. The purpose is not to predict the future with certainty. It is to identify plausible risks early enough to create decision options.

An effective warning must connect to early action. Accurate analysis has little practical value if institutions lack political will, resources, trusted partners, or pre-agreed response mechanisms.

Negotiation and Mediation

Negotiation

Negotiation is a process in which actors communicate to seek an agreement or manage disagreement. Analytical tools include reservation points, bargaining ranges, alternatives to agreement, issue linkage, sequencing, and the distinction between distributive and integrative bargaining.

Power asymmetries do not disappear at the table. A weaker actor may possess leverage through legitimacy, public support, control of territory, external allies, time, information, or the ability to impose costs. Good analysis therefore avoids reducing bargaining power to military strength alone.

Mediation

Mediation involves a third party that assists conflict parties in reaching or implementing agreements. Mediators can help structure communication, clarify issues, generate options, reduce misperceptions, propose sequencing, and coordinate guarantees.

United Nations guidance highlights preparedness, consent, impartiality, inclusivity, national ownership, international law, coherence, coordination, and the quality of peace agreements. These principles can conflict in practice. For example, broader inclusion may improve legitimacy but make negotiations more complex.

A mediator is not necessarily neutral about all norms. Impartiality concerns the process and treatment of parties, while international law and human-rights standards can limit acceptable outcomes.

Peacekeeping, Peacemaking, and Peacebuilding

The United Nations distinguishes related but overlapping activities. Conflict prevention seeks to stop disputes from becoming violent. Peacemaking supports diplomatic efforts to reach an agreement. Peacekeeping helps maintain security and political space, often in support of a ceasefire or peace agreement. Peace enforcement can involve coercive measures authorized to restore or maintain peace. Peacebuilding addresses conditions that could lead to renewed violence and supports capacities for sustainable peace.

These activities rarely follow a neat linear sequence. In practice, a mission may combine political dialogue, civilian protection, electoral support, human-rights work, rule-of-law assistance, and early peacebuilding.

The blue helmet has become a recognizable symbol of United Nations peacekeeping.

This United Nations video marking the International Day of UN Peacekeepers provides historical context for peacekeeping service and sacrifice.

The three basic principles commonly associated with UN peacekeeping are consent of the parties, impartiality, and non-use of force except in self-defence and defence of the mandate. Contemporary multidimensional operations may also protect civilians, support political processes, assist disarmament and reintegration, promote human rights, and support rule-of-law institutions.

Peacekeeping is not a universal solution. Mandates can be ambitious, consent can be partial or fragile, host-state cooperation may deteriorate, resources may be inadequate, and peacekeepers can face serious protection and legitimacy challenges. Evaluation must therefore compare mandates, capabilities, political strategies, local conditions, and outcomes.

Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration

Disarmament, demobilization, and reintegration, often abbreviated DDR, aims to help move people away from armed organizations and toward civilian life or other lawful security arrangements. Disarmament concerns weapons; demobilization concerns the formal release of members from armed structures; reintegration concerns longer-term social and economic participation.

DDR is deeply political. Eligibility rules, sequencing, community acceptance, security guarantees, livelihood opportunities, and links to transitional justice can determine whether a program supports peace or creates new grievances.

Related security sector reform seeks to improve the effectiveness, accountability, legitimacy, and civilian oversight of institutions such as police, armed forces, corrections, and justice bodies.

International Humanitarian Law and Civilian Protection

International humanitarian law regulates conduct during armed conflict. It seeks to limit suffering by protecting people who are not or are no longer taking part in hostilities and by restricting methods and means of warfare. Core ideas include distinction, proportionality, precautions in attack, humane treatment, and special protections for certain persons and objects.

International humanitarian law and international human rights law are related but distinct bodies of law. Their fields of application differ, although both can be relevant during armed conflict.

This International Committee of the Red Cross video illustrates how compliance with humanitarian law can protect wounded and sick people during armed conflict.

Studying civilian protection requires more than knowing legal rules. You should analyze command structures, incentives, local security arrangements, humanitarian access, accountability mechanisms, and the ways civilians themselves negotiate safety.

Peace Agreements and Implementation

A peace agreement can address ceasefires, political participation, constitutional reform, territorial arrangements, security guarantees, elections, power sharing, resource governance, justice, return of displaced people, or monitoring mechanisms.

Signing an agreement is not the same as implementing it. Post-agreement periods can remain dangerous because armed actors retain capabilities, spoilers may reject the settlement, institutions may be weak, and promises may be delayed. Monitoring, sequencing, verification, financing, public communication, and broad political support are therefore central to implementation.

A durable agreement often requires both elite bargains and social legitimacy. Local communities may judge peace by everyday security, access to services, justice, land, jobs, recognition, and the behavior of state authorities rather than by the text of an accord alone.

Transitional Justice, Memory, and Reconciliation

Transitional justice refers to approaches societies use to address legacies of serious human-rights violations and mass violence. Measures can include criminal prosecutions, truth-seeking, reparations, institutional reform, memorialization, and guarantees of non-recurrence.

There is no universal formula. Demands for accountability can interact with the political need to end violence, while amnesties, prosecutions, and truth processes may have different legal and social consequences. You should ask who defines justice, which victims are recognized, how gendered harms are addressed, and whether institutions can implement promised measures.

Reconciliation is also contested. It may refer to restored relationships, coexistence, acknowledgment, trust, or institutional change. It should not be treated as an obligation for victims to forgive.

The Hiroshima Peace Memorial demonstrates how places of memory can become sites of mourning, education, political interpretation, and advocacy for peace.

Gender, Inclusion, and Participation

The Women, Peace and Security agenda, associated with United Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 and later resolutions, emphasizes women's participation in peace and security decision-making, protection from conflict-related harms, prevention, and gender-responsive recovery.

Inclusion is broader than adding representatives to a negotiating table. Meaningful participation asks whether groups can shape agendas, influence decisions, access information, and hold institutions accountable. Researchers also examine the roles of youth, Indigenous peoples, displaced communities, minorities, people with disabilities, local authorities, and civil society organizations.

Inclusive processes can improve knowledge and legitimacy, but inclusion alone does not guarantee agreement or implementation. Representation, selection procedures, power differences, and the connection between formal negotiations and wider society all matter.

Sustainable Peace, Development, and Institutions

Peace and development influence one another. Armed conflict can destroy infrastructure, interrupt education, displace populations, reduce investment, weaken institutions, and deepen distrust. At the same time, exclusionary institutions, corruption, unequal access to justice, and severe economic shocks can intensify conflict risks.

Sustainable Development Goal 16 links peace with justice and effective, accountable, inclusive institutions. This framing is useful because it treats peace as more than a military issue.

The Nobel Peace Prize medal is a reminder that peacebuilding involves public recognition, moral claims, institutions, social movements, diplomacy, and political contestation. Awards can highlight contributions, but they should not substitute for critical evaluation of outcomes.

Comparative Case Study Method

University-level conflict and peace studies requires comparison rather than simple storytelling. A strong case study identifies an analytical question, specifies the outcome to be explained, traces causal processes, considers alternative explanations, and uses evidence from multiple sources.

You might compare the 1998 Good Friday Agreement in Northern Ireland, the 2016 peace agreement in Colombia, the South African Truth and Reconciliation Commission, or community-level peacebuilding in other contexts. Avoid calling a case a simple success or failure. Peace processes can reduce some forms of violence while leaving other forms of insecurity unresolved.

Case selection matters. Comparing only famous settlements can create selection bias. Negative cases, failed negotiations, partial settlements, and local peace processes can reveal mechanisms that success stories hide.

Research Methods and Evidence

Conflict research can use statistical datasets, surveys, interviews, archival documents, satellite imagery, social-media data, ethnography, process tracing, experiments, and participatory methods. Each method captures some features better than others.

Quantitative data can identify patterns across many cases, but coding rules, missing data, reporting bias, and changing definitions must be examined. Qualitative research can reconstruct processes and meanings, but access, positionality, translation, and source reliability require careful reflection.

Triangulation means comparing multiple forms of evidence rather than trusting a single source. In conflict settings, this is especially important because propaganda, fear, incomplete records, and strategic communication can distort information.

Ethical research requires informed consent where appropriate, risk assessment, secure data practices, sensitivity to trauma, and attention to the possibility that research itself may expose participants to harm. The principle of do no harm should shape both research and intervention design.

Emerging Challenges

Contemporary peace research increasingly examines climate-related security risks, cyber operations, digital surveillance, information manipulation, autonomous systems, urban violence, organized crime, transnational armed networks, displacement, and the interaction between local conflicts and geopolitical competition.

Climate change should not be described as a direct automatic cause of war. Environmental pressures can interact with livelihoods, governance, inequality, migration, land use, and political institutions. Similarly, digital media can support peace activism and early warning while also accelerating rumor, harassment, polarization, and coordinated manipulation.

Emerging technologies create new questions about accountability, escalation, verification, and civilian protection. Conflict and peace studies therefore depends on continuous interdisciplinary learning.

Sources and Further Study

United Nations Peacekeeping: Official overview of peacekeeping principles, mandates, and practice.
United Nations Peacekeeping Terminology: Definitions of conflict prevention, peacemaking, peacekeeping, peace enforcement, and peacebuilding.
United Nations Guidance for Effective Mediation: Principles and practical guidance for mediation processes.
Uppsala Conflict Data Program: Research data and operational definitions for organized violence and armed conflict.
International Committee of the Red Cross: Resources on international humanitarian law and the protection of people affected by armed conflict.
United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 16: Peace, justice, and strong institutions.
Peace and conflict studies: A general overview of the academic field.
Peacebuilding: Concepts and debates about reducing the risk of renewed violence.
Conflict resolution: Approaches to managing and transforming conflict.
Nonviolent resistance: Strategies of organized nonviolent action.

Interactive Tasks

Quiz: Test Your Knowledge

Diesen aiMOOC als Battle spielen

What best describes positive peace? (Conditions that support just and sustainable peaceful relations) (!A temporary pause in all political disagreement) (!The military victory of one actor over another) (!The complete absence of social change)

What is a central purpose of conflict analysis? (To identify actors relationships drivers and dynamics) (!To prove that one side is morally correct) (!To replace evidence with a single theory) (!To predict every future event with certainty)

Which statement matches the UCDP threshold used for state based armed conflict? (At least 25 battle related deaths in a calendar year) (!At least 10 civilian deaths in a decade) (!At least 1000 displaced people in a month) (!At least 50 arrests during a protest)

Which is a basic principle of United Nations peacekeeping? (Consent of the parties) (!Permanent military occupation) (!Automatic regime change) (!Unlimited use of force)

What is the main purpose of international humanitarian law during armed conflict? (To limit suffering and regulate conduct in war) (!To guarantee victory to lawful combatants) (!To replace all domestic criminal law) (!To prohibit every form of political conflict)

What distinguishes mediation from direct bilateral negotiation? (A third party assists the conflict parties) (!Only military commanders may participate) (!The outcome must be imposed by a court) (!All disagreements are removed before talks begin)

What does DDR seek to support? (A transition from armed organizations toward civilian life or lawful security arrangements) (!The automatic creation of a new constitution) (!The permanent suspension of elections) (!The expansion of weapons markets)

What is a typical transitional justice measure? (Truth seeking) (!Secret territorial annexation) (!Permanent media censorship) (!Unreviewable emergency rule)

What does conflict sensitivity require? (Considering how an intervention may affect conflict dynamics) (!Assuming all aid has only positive effects) (!Avoiding contact with local communities) (!Using the same program design in every context)

What is a central concern of the Women Peace and Security agenda? (Meaningful participation of women in peace and security) (!Excluding civil society from peace processes) (!Treating gender as irrelevant during recovery) (!Replacing diplomacy with military rule)

Memory Game

Negative peace	Absence or major reduction of direct organized violence
Mediation	Third party assistance to help conflict parties communicate and seek agreement
Human security	Approach that centers threats to people and communities
DDR	Disarmament demobilization and reintegration after armed participation
Transitional justice	Measures addressing legacies of serious violations and mass violence
Conflict sensitivity	Practice of assessing how an intervention interacts with conflict dynamics

Drag and Drop

Match the correct terms.	Topic
Conflict prevention	Measures intended to stop disputes from escalating into violent conflict
Peacemaking	Diplomatic work aimed at reaching a political settlement
Peacekeeping	Support for security and political space around a ceasefire or agreement
Peacebuilding	Long term work to reduce recurrence and strengthen capacities for sustainable peace
Reconciliation	Processes that address damaged relationships recognition trust and coexistence

...

Crossword Puzzle

Mediation	What process uses a third party to assist conflict parties in reaching agreement?
Ceasefire	What is an agreed suspension of fighting called?
Peacekeeping	What practice supports security and political space after or during a settlement?
Peacebuilding	What long term process seeks to reduce the risk of renewed conflict?
Reconciliation	What term describes efforts to repair damaged relationships and coexistence?
Nonviolence	What approach pursues political or social goals without using physical violence?

LearningApps

Cloze Text

Conflict is not identical to violence because disagreements can remain

. The absence of direct organized violence is often called

. A broader concern with sustainable and just relationships is associated with

. A systematic study of actors drivers relationships and dynamics is called

. Third party assistance to negotiations is known as

. United Nations missions that support security and political processes are commonly described as

. Long term work intended to reduce renewed violence is called

. The laws that regulate conduct during armed conflict belong to

.

Open-Ended Tasks

Easy

Conflict Map: Choose a historical or current conflict and create a one-page stakeholder map showing at least six actors, their interests, relationships, and sources of influence.
Peace Vocabulary Brief: Write a 600-word explanation comparing negative peace, positive peace, human security, and peacebuilding, using one concrete example for each concept.
Media Analysis: Select two news reports about the same conflict event and compare framing, sources, missing voices, terminology, and evidence in a short analytical presentation.
Campus Dialogue: Design and facilitate a 20-minute structured dialogue on a low-risk campus disagreement, then write a reflection on listening, framing, and power.

Standard

Stakeholder Interview: Interview a practitioner, researcher, mediator, community organizer, or humanitarian worker about conflict analysis and summarize how practice differs from textbook models.
Negotiation Simulation: Build a multi-actor negotiation scenario with confidential role sheets, conduct the simulation, and evaluate bargaining strategies, power asymmetries, and the final agreement.
Peacebuilding Case Study: Produce a 1,500-word case study of a peace process that distinguishes settlement, implementation, inclusion, security, justice, and long-term outcomes.
Public Data Visualization: Use a credible conflict dataset to create an original chart or map, explain the operational definition behind the data, and identify at least three limits of the visualization.

Advanced

Comparative Peace Process Research: Compare two peace processes using a shared analytical framework and test at least two competing explanations for differences in implementation.
Conflict Early Warning Design: Develop an early-warning model with qualitative and quantitative indicators, thresholds, ethical safeguards, and a realistic early-action plan for one case.
Transitional Justice Policy Memo: Write a policy memo that evaluates at least three justice mechanisms for a hypothetical post-conflict society and explains trade-offs involving legality, legitimacy, feasibility, and victim participation.
Mini Documentary: Produce a 6-to-10-minute video on a local peacebuilding initiative, with informed consent, source attribution, multiple perspectives, and a critical discussion of impact.

Learning Assessment

Causal Analysis Assessment: Explain one pathway from a structural condition to violent escalation, identify the mechanisms in each step, and evaluate at least one alternative explanation.
Intervention Design Assessment: Design a conflict-sensitive intervention for a fictional crisis and justify how it reduces risk without intensifying exclusion or dependency.
Mediation Strategy Assessment: Create a mediation plan for parties with unequal power and explain how consent, impartiality, inclusion, sequencing, and legal norms would be handled.
Peacekeeping Evaluation Assessment: Evaluate a hypothetical peacekeeping mandate by comparing objectives, political strategy, capabilities, host-state consent, civilian protection, and measurable outcomes.
Justice and Peace Assessment: Analyze a scenario in which accountability demands appear to conflict with negotiations and propose a legally and ethically reasoned response.
Research Quality Assessment: Critique a short conflict study by identifying problems of measurement, source bias, causal inference, ethics, and generalizability, then propose improvements.

Evidence of Learning

Evidence type	What strong evidence demonstrates
Knowledge	Accurate use of concepts such as conflict, violence, negative peace, positive peace, mediation, peacekeeping, peacebuilding, transitional justice, and human security
Analytical skills	Ability to identify actors, interests, relationships, drivers, triggers, mechanisms, feedback loops, and alternative explanations
Methodological skills	Careful use of data, source evaluation, operational definitions, triangulation, comparison, and ethical research design
Practical products	Conflict maps, policy memos, negotiation plans, visualizations, case studies, interviews, presentations, or documentary media
Transfer	Ability to apply concepts to unfamiliar cases without assuming that one model, intervention, or historical analogy fits every context
Reflection	Recognition of uncertainty, positionality, power asymmetries, ethical dilemmas, and possible unintended consequences

OERs on the Topic

Linked Learning Areas

Conflict and Peace Studies

aiMOOC Projects

Inhalte werden geladen ...

Mediathek wird aus dem Wiki geladen ...

Frag mich zum aktuellen Lerninhalt oder wähle eine kurze Hilfe.

Textmodus bereit

Sprache