ABI LF - Competing narratives of British identity
ABI LF - Competing narratives of British identity
Einleitung
Mini-description: Compare different documented narratives of British identity and analyse how history, values, memory and social change shape competing ideas of belonging.
Target group: Englisch als fortgeführte Fremdsprache, Kursstufe, Baden-Württemberg, Leistungsfach. English first: Du erschließt Bedeutung zuerst aus Kontext, Wortbildung, Visualisierung und englischer Erklärung. Ein Wörterbuch kommt vor deutscher Hilfe.
This aiMOOC treats British identity as a field of competing, documented narratives, not as one fixed essence. A narrative selects facts, symbols, memories and values and connects them into a meaningful story. Your task is to identify that framing, test it against evidence and compare it with other documented perspectives.
Privacy and authorship: Use fictional personal data in practice tasks. Recordings are voluntary and may stay private on your device. No upload is required. No external AI access is required. If AI is permitted by your teacher, declare its use, verify every factual claim against sources and write the actual analysis yourself. Do not submit AI-generated replacement essays.
Media entry: What looks “British”?


See – Think – Question: First describe only what you can observe. Then infer what kind of Britain is being presented. Finally ask: Who is speaking, what is foregrounded, and what may be missing?
The video is hosted by the Migration Museum and introduces its exhibition All Our Stories: Migration and the Making of Britain. Treat the exhibition itself as a curated narrative: useful evidence, but not a neutral “whole story”.
I-can goals
- I can distinguish the United Kingdom, Great Britain, England and British national identity.
- I can compare institutional, imperial, postcolonial, civic-values, multinational and memory-based narratives without treating one as the whole truth.
- I can analyse provenance, audience, purpose, language, visuals, omissions and historical context.
- I can connect two or more sources and qualify claims when evidence is limited or methodologically uncertain.
- I can communicate a differentiated argument in speaking and writing at Leistungsfach level.
- I can verify statistics, quotations and AI-supported claims before using them.
Abi alignment: checked for the current published requirements
Stand: 02 October 2026. The Baden-Württemberg Ministry currently publishes subject regulations for Abitur 2027 and 2028. The latest published Facherlass used here is Abitur 2028, version 02.07.2026. For Englisch Leistungsfach it keeps the topic field Politics, culture, society – between tradition and change with the reference culture United Kingdom, including the Elizabethan Age, the British Empire, postcolonial Britain and current questions of identity as well as political, cultural and social developments.
For the Leistungsfach, the official curriculum expects greater complexity and abstraction as well as greater breadth, depth and differentiation than the Basisfach. In the qualification phase, tasks should cover AFB I, II and III, with AFB II and III more strongly emphasised than AFB I.
Written examination 2028: about 255 minutes including selection time: about 30 minutes listening, then a 15-minute break, then 225 minutes writing. The writing part offers a literary and a non-literary task for selection and can include visuals, statistics or diagrams. It includes aspect-based reading comprehension, analysis, and a personal response or creative writing task. Approved aids include a monolingual English dictionary, a bilingual English–German/German–English dictionary and a German spelling reference.
Communication examination: This is the oral part named separately in the Facherlass; its organisation and assessment follow the current Beurteilungs- und Korrekturrichtlinien. Do not confuse it with the additional oral examination in a subject that was taken in writing.
Mediation: Sprachmittlung remains a curriculum competence and is tested during the qualification phase; in the 2028 Facherlass one assessment or part-assessment checks mediation in an isolated format, usually with foreign-language text production. The final written examination itself is described as listening plus writing.
Important: Your own Prüfungsjahrgang and the school’s current instructions are decisive. This MOOC is a focused module, not a replacement for the full compulsory syllabus or the prescribed works.
Vorwissen aktivieren
Quick diagnostic
Without looking anything up, write one sentence for each prompt: UK ≠ England; identity ≠ citizenship; memory ≠ history; narrative ≠ fact list. Then check your definitions against the source stations below.
30-second map check: Point to England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. Explain why “British” can function as a state-linked identity while people may also use English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish or other identities.
Core input: competing narratives
What is a narrative?
A narrative is a structured way of making meaning. It connects selected events, symbols and values. In identity debates, narratives often answer questions such as: Who belongs? What past matters? Which institutions represent “us”? What has changed?
Do not ask only “Is this narrative true?” Ask more precisely: Which claims are supported, which evidence is selected, which groups are visible, and what counter-evidence would test the frame?
Six documented frames to compare
| Narrative frame | Typical focus | Evidence to test it with | Analytical question |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union / institutional | Parliament, monarchy, law, state institutions, devolution | parliamentary sources, constitutional history, devolved institutions | How does a union state create common institutions while powers and identities are territorially differentiated? |
| Imperial | empire, global reach, trade, war, hierarchy, colonial rule | maps, archives, speeches, colonial and anti-colonial sources | Which forms of power are celebrated, normalised, criticised or omitted? |
| Postcolonial / migration | migration, Windrush, diaspora, cultural change, belonging | oral history, archives, museum curation, literature | How do migration experiences revise older stories of who counts as British? |
| Civic-values | democracy, rule of law, liberty, respect and tolerance | government policy language, legal and educational documents | Is the source describing social reality, prescribing an ideal, or both? |
| Multinational / layered | British plus English, Scottish, Welsh, Northern Irish and other identities | census data, devolution research, surveys | How can several identities coexist, overlap or compete? |
| Memory / commemoration | monuments, ceremonies, museums, anniversaries, public symbols | memorials, photographs, curatorial texts, commemorative speeches | What is remembered, by whom, for what present purpose? |
History: union, empire, decolonisation, devolution

Use the map as a historical source object, not as a neutral picture. Check its date, projection, categories and what political relationships are flattened by colour.
| Anchor | Why it matters for identity narratives |
|---|---|
| 1707 | The Acts of Union joined the parliaments of England and Scotland in the Kingdom of Great Britain. |
| 1801 | A new union incorporated Ireland into the United Kingdom; later political change and partition altered that relationship. |
| nineteenth and early twentieth centuries | Empire connected British institutions and identities to colonial power, migration and global networks. |
| post-1945 | Decolonisation and post-war migration changed the social context in which Britishness was debated and represented. |
| late 1990s onward | Devolution created or restored major legislatures in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, making territorial layers of government more visible. |
| today | British identity remains compatible with multiple self-descriptions; sources disagree on what history and values should be foregrounded. |
Viewing lens: The UK Parliament video on the division of Ireland is an institutional educational source. Note what it explains clearly, then identify what additional Irish or Northern Irish perspectives you would need before forming a judgement.
Institutions and devolution

The United Kingdom has asymmetrical devolution: Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland have devolved institutions with different powers, while the constitutional arrangements for England are different. Devolution is therefore both a governance fact and a source of identity questions. Avoid the shortcut “devolution = separation”; it is a transfer of powers within the UK constitutional order.
Source task: Compare the UK Parliament video with the House of Commons Library overview on devolution. Which source is primarily explanatory for learners, and which is designed as research briefing? How does genre shape detail and vocabulary?
Values: an official policy narrative
In English education policy, the UK government uses the label fundamental British values for democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of people with different faiths and beliefs. Analyse this as official normative language. It tells you how a government document frames desired civic values; it does not by itself prove that these values are uniquely British or universally interpreted in the same way.
AFB III prompt: To what extent is calling broadly democratic principles “British values” an inclusive civic narrative? Build an answer from evidence and counter-evidence, not from slogans.
Memory: empire, war and public commemoration

Public memory is selective. A memorial can connect generations and create shared rituals while also raising questions about whose experiences are represented. Analyse composition, symbolism, captioning, setting and institutional context before interpreting meaning.
Compare: A war memorial and a museum exhibition both construct memory, but they use different genres. What kinds of evidence and emotion does each make available?
Postcolonial Britain: Windrush and migration

The National Archives video uses archival documents to explore Caribbean migration and the Windrush story. Some historical documents contain language that is offensive today; treat such wording as evidence of its historical context, not language to reproduce casually.

The British Library conversation with Benjamin Zephaniah and Black Cultural Archives connects family experience, literature, memory and public history. Compare this lived-experience / cultural-memory perspective with the archival framing above. Neither source should be asked to stand for every Black British or Caribbean British experience.
Social change and data literacy
The Office for National Statistics defines national identity as a self-determined sense of identity or belonging; it is not the same thing as ethnic group or citizenship, and respondents can select more than one identity.
For Census 2021 in England and Wales, 90.3% of usual residents selected at least one UK national identity. But a major apparent shift between “English only” and “British only” responses cannot be read naively as social change: the ONS warns that a change in question structure, including response order in England, probably explains much of that difference.
Data rule: Before turning a statistic into a narrative, check population, date, question wording, response options and comparability.
Listening and Viewing
Three-pass method
Pass 1 – gist: Identify topic, speaker/source, audience and main claim.
Pass 2 – evidence: Note examples, dates, contrasts, evaluative vocabulary and visual choices.
Pass 3 – framing: Write one sentence beginning: “This source constructs British identity mainly through …, while leaving … less visible.”
Choose two or three of the embedded videos. Do not try to transcribe them. In exam-oriented practice, listen for meaning and structure, not every word.
Viewing challenge
Create a two-column note sheet: what the source shows / what the source claims. Add a third box: what I would need to verify. This prevents images, archives and confident narration from being mistaken for self-validating evidence.
Reading
Source stations
| Station | Source | Reading mission |
|---|---|---|
| A | ONS: National identity, England and Wales, Census 2021 | Extract definition, population, two relevant figures and one methodological warning. |
| B | House of Commons Library: Devolution in the UK | Identify how powers are distributed and why “the UK” is not institutionally uniform. |
| C | GOV.UK: Prevent duty guidance | Locate the official values language and distinguish prescription from description. |
| D | Migration Museum: All Our Stories | Analyse curatorial framing: what story of migration and belonging is foregrounded? |
| E | The National Archives: The Empire Windrush | Trace how primary documents are selected to build a historical account. |
Copyright-aware reading: Work from source links and teacher-selected short extracts. Do not copy complete protected texts, prescribed literary works or film sequences into the MOOC. For prescribed works such as Andrea Levy’s Loose Change or Zadie Smith’s The Embassy of Cambodia, use your authorised class copy and analyse only the passages your course provides.
Context vocabulary
English first: word families and meaning
| Base | Word family | English explanation |
|---|---|---|
| belong | belonging | feeling accepted as part of a place, group or community |
| nation | national, nationality, nationalism | terms linking people, political community and national identification |
| include | inclusion, inclusive | bringing people or perspectives into a group or account |
| exclude | exclusion, exclusionary | keeping people or perspectives outside a group or frame |
| colony | colonial, colonise, decolonisation | vocabulary for colonial rule and the processes that ended or challenged it |
| empire | imperial, imperialism | vocabulary for political power extending over other territories and peoples |
| migrate | migrant, migration | moving from one place or country to another to live |
| devolve | devolution | transferring powers from central government to institutions in parts of the state |
| commemorate | commemoration, commemorative | publicly remembering people or events |
| contest | contested, contestation | challenged because different groups interpret or value something differently |
| represent | representation, representative | showing, speaking for or depicting people and ideas |
| qualify | qualification, qualified | limiting a claim so that it matches the strength and scope of the evidence |
Help ladder before German support
- Context: infer meaning from the sentence and the source topic.
- Word formation: identify prefix, suffix and related forms.
- Visualise: sketch an icon, timeline or concept link.
- English explanation: paraphrase the word in simple English.
- Dictionary: use an approved monolingual dictionary; then a bilingual exam dictionary if needed.
- German last resort: belonging = Zugehörigkeit; devolution = Übertragung politischer Zuständigkeiten; commemoration = öffentliches Gedenken; contested = umstritten; qualification = Einschränkung/Präzisierung einer Aussage.
Analyse
SOURCE method
| Step | Question |
|---|---|
| S – Source | Who produced it? What genre, date and institutional context? |
| O – Occasion and audience | For whom and in what situation was it produced? |
| U – Underlying claim | What view of Britain, belonging or the past is foregrounded? |
| R – Representation | How do wording, structure, image choice, statistics or narrative technique shape meaning? |
| C – Context and counter-evidence | What historical context matters? Which other source could test or complicate the claim? |
| E – Evidence-based evaluation | How far does the evidence support your interpretation, and what qualification is necessary? |
LF move: Do not stop at identifying a technique. Explain its effect in this source, for this audience, in relation to this narrative.
Visual analysis
Use the Facherlass categories for discontinuous material: composition, proportion, scale, symbolism, perspective plus captions, headings and slogans where relevant.
Try it on the Empire map, the Windrush monument and the Cenotaph image. Your interpretation should cite visible details before moving to historical context.
Speaking
Communication practice
Round 1: 90-second evidence talk. Choose one image. Give a claim, two visual details and one qualification.
Round 2: paired discussion. Prompt: “Can British identity function as a shared civic identity in a multinational and postcolonial state?” One partner opens with evidence; the other adds a different documented narrative. Switch roles.
Round 3: synthesis. End with a sentence that does not erase disagreement: “The sources converge on …, but differ over … because …”
For exam preparation, follow your school’s current communication-exam format and assessment criteria. Practice interaction, listening to your partner, spontaneous clarification and evidence-based development rather than memorised mini-speeches.
Recording option: If you record practice, do so voluntarily and keep it private unless you explicitly choose otherwise.
Writing
From AFB II to AFB III
AFB II – analyse/compare: Explain how two sources construct British identity through different selections of history, values or memory.
AFB III – discuss/evaluate: Develop a judgement about the usefulness and limits of a narrative, using at least two sources and a counter-perspective.
Paragraph engine: Claim → precise evidence → analysis of form/framing → context → qualification → link to question.
No model essay is provided. Build your own thesis and paragraphs.
Abi-style micro tasks
Reading / summary: Summarise the ONS explanation of national identity and the key methodological warning in about 80 words.
Analysis: Analyse how one official source constructs authority through structure, terminology and evidence.
Comment: Discuss whether national identity is better understood as a shared story, a legal-political framework or a layered form of belonging. Use documented evidence and make your criteria explicit.
Creative format practice: Draft a speech manuscript for a museum youth forum explaining why one object alone cannot represent “British identity”.
Mediation
Short mediation task
German classroom note, didactically created from verified sources: „Britische Identität ist nicht mit englischer Identität oder Staatsbürgerschaft gleichzusetzen. Im Zensus können Menschen mehrere nationale Identitäten angeben. Außerdem sind politische Zuständigkeiten im Vereinigten Königreich durch Devolution unterschiedlich verteilt. Statistische Veränderungen müssen vorsichtig interpretiert werden, wenn sich die Frageform geändert hat.“
Task: Your English exchange partner asks why a simple “British = English” chart is misleading. Mediate the relevant information into a concise English message. Do not translate sentence by sentence; select what the recipient needs.
Differenzierung
Route by support, depth and pace
| Route | Material load | Expected thinking | Language support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Support | one core source + one image | identify claim and evidence; one qualification | word-family table + sentence starters |
| Core | two contrasting sources | compare framing and context; connect evidence | dictionary + paragraph engine |
| LF Stretch | three or more sources of different genres | evaluate provenance, methodology, counter-evidence and limits | independent academic phrasing; precise qualification |
45 minutes: media entry + one source + one analytical paragraph.
90 minutes: two-source comparison + speaking synthesis.
180 minutes: source dossier + writing + feedback + revision.
Hilfen
Sentence starters
Evidence: “The source foregrounds … by …” / “A visible indicator is …” / “The data applies specifically to …”
Comparison: “Both sources frame belonging as …; however, they differ in …”
Qualification: “This supports the claim only to the extent that …” / “The comparison is limited because …”
Source criticism: “As an institutional source, it is useful for …, but it should be complemented by …”
Synthesis: “Taken together, the sources suggest … while leaving unresolved …”
Feedback und Fehleranalyse
Peer feedback: four checks
| Check | Question |
|---|---|
| Evidence | Is every major claim linked to a concrete source detail? |
| Analysis | Does the response explain how framing creates meaning rather than merely label techniques? |
| Range | Are at least two documented narratives connected rather than discussed in isolation? |
| Qualification | Are population, date, genre, methodology and limits stated where relevant? |
Common errors to repair
- England = UK: Replace with precise territorial language.
- Identity = citizenship: Check the source definition before using the terms.
- Narrative = fact: Separate documented fact, source framing and your inference.
- Statistic without population: State where, when and who was measured.
- Trend without method check: Inspect wording and response-order changes.
- Technique spotting: Explain the function and effect of the technique.
- Quote dump: Use short evidence and spend more words analysing it.
- AI confidence = verification: Trace claims to authoritative sources and disclose permitted AI support.
Transfer
Use the same method on another identity debate: regional identity, European identity, migration memory or a museum exhibition. Keep the analytical categories constant: source, audience, claim, representation, context, counter-evidence, qualification. The aim is not to declare one identity narrative “correct”, but to explain what each frame can and cannot establish.
Abi-Check
Written exam versus communication exam
| Written examination, LF | Communication examination |
|---|---|
| Listening plus writing under the current Facherlass | Separate oral component governed by current assessment guidelines |
| About 30 min listening, 15 min break, 225 min writing in the 2028 regulations | Train spontaneous interaction, coherent speaking, listening and response |
| Literary or non-literary writing task for selection; reading, analysis and response/creative writing | Do not rely on memorised essays; respond to material and partner contributions |
| Dictionaries named in the Facherlass are permitted | Check the exact current school instructions and official assessment criteria |
Last-minute checklist: Can you define the population of a statistic? Can you distinguish fact from framing? Can you connect two genres? Can you explain an effect, not just name a technique? Can you qualify a judgement? Can you verify the source?
Current official source check
- Ministerium für Kultus Baden-Württemberg: Termine und Informationen zum Abitur
- Facherlass Abitur 2028, Stand 02.07.2026
- Facherlass Abitur 2027, Stand 09.09.2025
- Bildungsplan Englisch: Leitgedanken, Basisfach und Leistungsfach
- Bildungsplan Englisch, Klassen 11/12 Leistungsfach
Folgekurs
Continue with ABI LF - British Empire, postcolonial Britain and migration or ABI LF - On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters. Reuse your source matrix so that new material extends rather than replaces the evidence base.
Interaktive Aufgaben
Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen
What is the most precise relationship between England and the United Kingdom? (England is one constituent country of the United Kingdom) (!England and the United Kingdom are identical) (!England contains Scotland and Wales) (!The United Kingdom is only another name for Great Britain)
In this course, what is a narrative? (A structured frame that selects and connects facts, symbols and values) (!A list of facts with no perspective) (!A personal opinion that needs no evidence) (!A synonym for citizenship)
How does the ONS define national identity in Census 2021? (As a self-determined sense of identity or belonging) (!As a category fixed by citizenship) (!As the same thing as ethnic group) (!As a category chosen by the government)
Why must the 2011 and 2021 English versus British identity figures be compared cautiously? (The question structure and response order changed) (!The 2021 Census included only tourists) (!National identity was not measured in 2021) (!All respondents had to select exactly one identity)
Which UK content is explicitly named in the current Baden-Württemberg Facherlass for English LF? (The Elizabethan Age, the British Empire, postcolonial Britain and current identity-related developments) (!Only medieval English literature) (!Only the history of the United States) (!Only grammar and translation)
How are the Anforderungsbereiche weighted in LF course assessment according to the Facherlass? (AFB II and III are more strongly emphasised than AFB I) (!AFB I is the only relevant area) (!AFB I is more strongly emphasised than AFB II and III) (!AFB III must not appear)
What are the two main components of the 2028 written English LF examination? (Listening and writing) (!Speaking and translation only) (!Grammar and vocabulary only) (!Reading aloud and dictation)
What is the safest way to use the phrase fundamental British values in analysis? (As official normative policy language that should be contextualised) (!As proof that all British people define identity identically) (!As a scientific measure of citizenship) (!As evidence that these values exist only in Britain)
What does devolution describe? (The transfer of certain powers from central government to institutions in parts of the UK) (!The automatic dissolution of the United Kingdom) (!The abolition of all local government) (!A census method for measuring identity)
What makes a source comparison strongest at Leistungsfach level? (Connecting claim, provenance, context, evidence and counter-evidence) (!Counting the number of difficult words) (!Choosing the source you agree with) (!Summarising each source without linking them)
Memory
| Britishness | identity linked to the United Kingdom |
| Englishness | identity linked to England |
| Devolution | transfer of powers from central government |
| Windrush | post-war Caribbean migration and public memory |
| Framing | selective presentation of a topic |
| Commemoration | public practice of remembering |
| Provenance | origin and context of a source |
| Qualification | limitation that matches a claim to the evidence |
Drag and Drop
| Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu. | Thema |
|---|---|
| Union-state narrative | common institutions and territorial governance |
| Imperial narrative | empire, power and colonial memory |
| Postcolonial narrative | migration, diaspora and belonging |
| Civic-values narrative | official language about democracy, law and liberty |
| Multinational narrative | overlapping British and national identities |
Kreuzworträtsel
| Narrative | What word means a selective frame that connects events and values? |
| Devolution | What word means transferring political powers to institutions in parts of a state? |
| Windrush | What ship name became a key term in post-war Caribbean British memory? |
| Belonging | What word describes feeling part of a place or community? |
| Empire | What word describes a political system extending power over territories and peoples? |
| Census | What official population count can include questions on national identity? |
LearningApps
Lückentext
Offene Aufgaben
Leicht
- British identity - Bildanalyse: Annotate one Commons image with five visible details and two cautious interpretations.
- Kontextwortschatz British identity: Build a word-family map for belong, nation, migrate, represent and commemorate.
- Quellensteckbrief British identity: Create a provenance card for one official source: producer, date, audience, purpose and genre.
- Listening British identity: Watch one embedded institutional video and create a six-point timeline of its argument without transcribing it.
Standard
- Narrative comparison British identity: Compare one institutional and one migration-related source in a 200-word analytical response.
- ONS national identity data: Visualise two Census 2021 figures and add a methodological warning directly underneath your chart.
- Speaking British identity: Conduct a paired evidence discussion in which each person introduces a different narrative and both end with a synthesis.
- Mediation British identity: Turn the German classroom note from the mediation section into a concise, audience-focused English message.
Schwer
- Multiperspective dossier British identity: Build a three-source dossier from an official source, a memory source and a data source; explain where they converge and conflict.
- Contested memory exhibition: Design a mini exhibition with three legally reusable images and 80-word captions showing how selection changes public memory.
- LF writing British identity: Write an independent AFB II/III response linking at least three materials, including one counter-perspective and one methodological qualification.
- Source audit and AI literacy: Take five factual claims from notes or a permitted AI output, trace each to an authoritative source, mark unsupported claims and rewrite them accurately. Do not upload personal data or outsource the final essay.


Lernkontrolle
- Transfer - Identity und Institutionen: Explain how devolution can make both shared and territorially specific identities politically visible. Use two kinds of evidence.
- Transfer - Werte und Quellenart: Compare an official values document with a museum source. Show how genre changes what each can establish.
- Transfer - Statistik und Narrativ: Given a fictional headline claiming that one identity “replaced” another, use the ONS methodology warning to explain why the conclusion may be too strong.
- Transfer - Erinnerungskultur: Compare the Cenotaph and Windrush monument as memory objects. Analyse selection, symbolism and historical context without ranking their importance.
- Transfer - Quellenkonflikt: Two sources disagree about what most strongly shapes British identity. Construct a synthesis that preserves the disagreement and identifies what further evidence is needed.
- Transfer - Abi writing: Produce a thesis and paragraph plan for an AFB III task, then label where you use evidence, context, counter-evidence and qualification.
Lernnachweis
For a strong Lernnachweis, show that you can:
- distinguish Britain-related geographical, political and identity terms precisely;
- explain at least four documented narratives of British identity;
- analyse one visual, one written source and one audio/video source;
- connect history, values, memory and social change;
- interpret ONS data with population and methodology limits;
- use source provenance and counter-evidence in AFB II/III reasoning;
- write and speak independently in differentiated English;
- document sources and identify any permitted AI support;
- revise one piece of work after feedback and explain what you changed.
The Lernnachweis itself contains no required external upload, no compulsory recording and no AI-generated replacement text.
OERs zum Thema
Open and public-source starting points:
- Wikimedia Commons – use the file pages of the embedded images for licence and attribution details.
- Office for National Statistics: National identity, England and Wales, Census 2021
- House of Commons Library: Devolution in the UK
- GOV.UK: Prevent duty guidance
- The National Archives: The Empire Windrush
- Migration Museum: All Our Stories
- UK Parliament: Parliament and Ireland
Media note: Images are embedded from Wikimedia Commons so their file pages remain available for licence information. YouTube material is embedded from the provider rather than copied or re-uploaded. Check availability and terms at the time of classroom use.
Verknüpfte Lernbereiche
aiMOOC-Projekte
MOOCwiki · Deutsch
Nach dem Lernen ist vor dem Lernen
Entdecke direkt den nächsten Lernkurs. Weitere Inhalte erscheinen, wenn Du weiter nach unten scrollst.
Zur MOOCwiki-HauptseiteMediathek
Mediathek wird aus dem Wiki geladen ...
Keine passenden Inhalte gefunden. Bitte ändere Suche oder Filter.
NEWSLernweltNOAH fragen