Die Druckversion wird nicht mehr unterstützt und kann Darstellungsfehler aufweisen. Bitte aktualisiere deine Browser-Lesezeichen und verwende stattdessen die Standard-Druckfunktion des Browsers.

aiMOOC

ABI LF - Vollständige Kommunikationsprüfung simulieren

QR-Code

ABI LF - Vollständige Kommunikationsprüfung simulieren

Einleitung

This aiMOOC lets you rehearse a complete 2027 English communication exam for the Abitur in Baden-Württemberg, Leistungsfach. You work through a media warm-up, a 15-minute preparation phase, a timed monologue and a dialogue, then use official-style criteria for feedback and error analysis.

The simulated materials are original or freely licensed. All survey data and school scenarios are fictional practice data. No complete compulsory text and no unauthorised film sequence is reproduced. Recordings are optional and should stay private unless everybody involved has explicitly agreed to sharing.

English first: Try context, word formation, visual clues, an English explanation and your dictionary before using German help.

Watch the British Council example for interaction, not as a model of the Baden-Württemberg exam format. While watching, note how speakers take turns, react, justify and keep the discussion moving.

I-can goals

I can explain the 2027 structure of the communication exam and distinguish it from the written exam.
I can prepare an unfamiliar visual, quotation or short text within 15 minutes.
I can speak coherently for about five minutes without reading a script.
I can connect materials, course knowledge and a justified interpretation at Leistungsfach level.
I can react spontaneously, challenge an idea politely and develop a discussion.
I can use evidence, precise vocabulary, discourse markers and appropriate register.
I can evaluate my performance using content, interaction/discourse and language criteria.
I can identify one high-impact next step instead of trying to correct everything at once.

Vorwissen aktivieren

Without looking anything up, answer in English:

What makes a strong five-minute monologue different from a written essay?
Which phrases help you disagree without stopping the conversation?
How can you use a visual source without merely describing it?
Which 2027 course topics could connect to migration, belonging, identity, the USA or the UK?
What would you do if you forgot a word in the middle of the exam?

Abitur 2027: offizieller Rahmen

Stand dieses aiMOOC: 02.10.2026. Vor einer echten Prüfung prüfst Du zusätzlich die aktuellsten Hinweise Deiner Schule und des Kultusministeriums.

Bereich	2027-Rahmen
Form	Einzelprüfung oder Tandemprüfung
Vorbereitung	15 Minuten unter Aufsicht
Monolog	etwa 5 Minuten pro Prüfling
Dialog Einzelprüfung	etwa 10 Minuten mit der Fachlehrkraft
Dialog Tandemprüfung	etwa 10 Minuten gemeinsam
Gesamtzeit Einzel	mindestens 15 Minuten
Gesamtzeit Tandem	mindestens 20 Minuten
Hilfsmittel in der Vorbereitung	ein in der Kursstufe eingeführtes einsprachiges und ein zweisprachiges Wörterbuch; keine weiteren Hilfsmittel
Sprache	Aufgabenstellung und Durchführung grundsätzlich in der Fremdsprache
Mögliche Impulse	visuell, auditiv, audiovisuell, Zitat, These; auch deutschsprachiger Impuls im Sinne der Sprachmittlung
Bewertung	Aufgabenerfüllung/Inhalt; Strategie und interaktive Gesprächs- bzw. Diskursfähigkeit; sprachliche Leistung
Gewichtung	Kommunikationsprüfung 25 Prozent der Gesamtnotenpunktzahl der schriftlichen Abiturprüfung
Frühester Termin	1. Februar 2027; den konkreten Zeitraum legt die Schule fest

Die Kommunikationsprüfung ist der mündliche Teil der schriftlichen Abiturprüfung im Leistungsfach. Sie ist nicht mit einer zusätzlichen mündlichen Prüfung im schriftlich geprüften Fach zu verwechseln.

Im Jahrgang 2027 gilt im Leistungsfach das Schwerpunktthema On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters. Hinzu kommen die Themenfelder zu USA sowie United Kingdom zwischen Tradition und Wandel. Im Leistungsfach werden AFB II und III gegenüber AFB I stärker akzentuiert.

Für die Kommunikationsprüfung gilt außerdem: Die monologische und dialogische Sequenz folgen einer thematischen Linie. Pflichtkanon-Auszüge dürfen nicht als Impuls verwendet werden. Findet die Kommunikationsprüfung nach dem schriftlichen Teil statt, dürfen auch die Themenstellungen der schriftlichen Prüfung nicht als Impuls verwendet werden.

Offizielle Quellen 2027

Prüfungsmodus verstehen

A useful mental model is Prepare → Structure → Speak → Interact → Reflect.

Phase	Your job	Common trap
Preparation	reduce the material to a few usable ideas and links	writing a full script
Monologue	make a clear claim, develop it and connect evidence	retelling material without analysis
Dialogue	listen, respond, extend, challenge and negotiate	giving mini-monologues next to each other
Feedback	identify evidence of success and one next step	counting every grammar mistake

Einzelprüfung oder Tandem?

Individual exam: You speak for about five minutes. The teacher then creates the thematic transition and acts as your dialogue partner for about ten minutes.

Tandem exam: Each candidate gives a monologue of about five minutes. You listen to one another and may take notes. Then both candidates discuss the task for about ten minutes. The dialogue should develop independently; examiner prompts are possible if the conversation stalls.

Listening and Viewing

Viewing task: discourse markers

Identify three discourse markers that organise spoken ideas.
Classify them: opinion, reformulation, emphasis, transition or summary.
Use two of them in a 30-second answer to: What can make a person feel that they belong?

Observation task: advanced speaking

This Cambridge C1 speaking video is not the Baden-Württemberg examination format. Use it only to observe transferable speaking skills.

Track one speaker for 90 seconds.
Note evidence for fluency, precision, interaction and repair strategies.
Replace a vague phrase you hear with a more precise alternative of your own.
Explain which feature would transfer well to the Baden-Württemberg Kommunikationsprüfung.

Dialogic thinking task

Watch a suitable section of the TED talk on productive disagreement. Then test this pattern:

Common ground → disagreement → reason → evidence/example → return question

Example: I agree that personal contact matters. Where I differ is the assumption that contact alone is enough, because ... How would you account for ...?

Context vocabulary

Build vocabulary from meaning networks, not isolated translations.

Core word	Word family	Useful collocation	English explanation
belong	belonging, belongings	sense of belonging	feeling accepted and connected to a place or group
integrate	integration, integrative	social integration	process of becoming part of a community while participating in it
migrate	migration, migrant, migratory	migration experience	movement from one place or country to another
include	inclusion, inclusive	inclusive community	allowing different people to participate and feel respected
displace	displacement, displaced	forced displacement	being made to leave a home or usual place
negotiate	negotiation, negotiable	negotiate a compromise	discuss different positions in order to reach an agreement

Word-building drill: Turn the noun into a useful speaking phrase: identity → identify with; participation → participate in; evidence → provide evidence for; contrast → in contrast to; assumption → challenge the assumption that.

Help ladder

Use help in this order:

Context: What meaning fits the sentence and topic?
Word formation: Can a known root help?
Visualisation: Can you picture or paraphrase the idea?
English explanation: Define the word with simpler English.
Dictionary: Check meaning, pronunciation, collocation and register.
German rescue: Use German only if the previous steps fail.

Reading

Read this original practice text. It is not an official exam text.

Practice text – “Belonging is an activity”

A fictional youth centre called Harbour House has redesigned its welcome programme for newly arrived students. Instead of beginning with a long information session, the centre pairs newcomers with local peer mentors and asks both sides to complete small projects together. The organisers say that people often learn practical language, routines and unwritten social rules faster when they work toward a shared goal. Critics in the fictional case warn that short projects can create superficial contact and may place too much responsibility on volunteers. The centre therefore combines peer activities with professional counselling and access to formal language support. Its working principle is simple: belonging is not treated as a label people receive on arrival, but as something that can grow through participation, recognition and repeated contact.

Reading task

State the central claim in one sentence.
Analyse how the final sentence reframes the concept of belonging.
Identify one limitation already acknowledged by the text.
Relate the text to one course concept without summarising a compulsory work.

Visual analysis

Use the historical image as an analysis prompt, not as proof for present-day migration experiences.

Three-layer method

Observe: people, setting, composition, distance, gaze, visible objects.
Interpret: possible effects, symbolism, perspective and limits of inference.
Connect: relate the image to concepts such as movement, arrival, belonging, identity and historical context.

Avoid claims about the people’s emotions unless the image itself supports them.

Complete mock exam

All names, institutions and survey data below are fictional. The task is designed to imitate the structure and level of a 2027 Leistungsfach communication exam, not to reproduce an official paper.

Exam scenario

Your school participates in the fictional Crossing Stories Project. Students are preparing an English-language event on migration, identity and belonging. You receive a historical visual, a short original text and fictional survey data.

Fictional survey: “What helps young newcomers feel they belong?” Sample: 200 fictional students aged 16–19. Participants could choose up to two answers.

Factor	Share selecting it
regular peer contact	68 percent
confidence using the local language	54 percent
access to clubs and shared activities	41 percent
clear routes into education or work	36 percent
opportunities to share personal stories publicly	28 percent

Important: These figures are invented for practice. Do not cite them as real research.

15-minute preparation simulation

Start a real timer.

Time	Action
Minutes 0–2	read all tasks; underline the operator and the exact focus
Minutes 2–5	inspect the visual and survey; note three high-value observations
Minutes 5–8	connect the material to course knowledge and one wider concept
Minutes 8–11	build a monologue skeleton with claim, evidence, analysis and link
Minutes 11–13	prepare the dialogic task: position, counterpoint, compromise
Minutes 13–15	check vocabulary, pronunciation and one difficult collocation in the dictionary

Do not write complete sentences unless you need one exact phrase. Aim for keywords, arrows and evidence labels.

Candidate A: monologue task

Speak for about five minutes.

Task

Analyze how the historical image, the practice text and the fictional survey present different dimensions of belonging. Relate your findings to the 2027 focus On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters. Then assess the statement: A sense of belonging develops mainly through participation rather than through arrival itself.

Leistungsfach expectation: Move beyond description. Link at least two materials explicitly, distinguish evidence from inference, use a relevant course concept and make a reasoned qualification of the statement.

Candidate B: tandem variant

If you train the tandem format, Candidate B prepares this additional original stimulus:

Fictional statement

A person should not have to choose between an old identity and a new one. Belonging can be layered, changing and shared across places.

Task

Examine the assumptions about identity in the statement. Relate them to migration and cross-cultural encounters. Evaluate how useful the idea of layered identity is for understanding the experience of moving between cultures.

Candidate B should also use at least one element from the historical image or fictional survey.

Five-minute monologue structure

Function	Useful move
Opening	define the focus and give a concise thesis
Material link 1	move from observation to interpretation
Material link 2	compare or qualify using a second source
Course connection	use knowledge selectively as evidence, not as a plot summary
Evaluation	weigh the claim, add a limitation or counterargument
Close	return to the thesis with a differentiated conclusion

Useful phrases:

The material foregrounds ... This becomes significant when compared with ... Rather than presenting belonging as ..., the source suggests ... A limitation of this interpretation is ... This can be related to ... because ... To a considerable extent, the claim is convincing; however ...

Ten-minute dialogue task

Situation

The fictional Crossing Stories Project can fund only two of the following activities for its final school event:

Option	Short description
Peer mentoring lab	pairs students for recurring joint projects
Story gallery	presents voluntary anonymous or pseudonymous migration stories
Language café	offers informal conversation with trained student hosts
Skills bridge	links newcomers with education and career guidance
Arts and sports exchange	creates mixed teams around shared creative or physical activities

Dialogue goal

Discuss which two activities should be selected. Develop criteria, challenge each other’s assumptions, refer to the material, consider practical limits and reach a justified joint decision if possible.

For the individual exam, a teacher or partner takes the second role. For the tandem exam, both candidates should contribute, react and move the conversation forward.

Interaction moves

Function	Language
invite	What is your take on that?
build	I would build on your point by adding ...
challenge	I see the logic, but does that assumption hold if ...?
qualify	That may be true in some cases, although ...
clarify	By participation, do you mean ...?
redirect	Could we apply the same criterion to ...?
negotiate	If we prioritise impact and feasibility, perhaps we could ...
summarise	So far, we seem to agree on ..., while ... remains open.

After watching a suitable section, choose one aspect of delivery to practise: pace, pause, emphasis, articulation or vocal variety. Do not imitate a speaker’s accent; aim for intelligibility and control.

Optional Mediation micro-task

A German-speaking student helper says:

„Bei unserem Projekttag sollen persönliche Erfahrungen nur freiwillig eingebracht werden. Niemand muss seine Familiengeschichte öffentlich erzählen. Wer mitmacht, entscheidet selbst, ob Name, Foto oder Aufnahme verwendet werden dürfen.“

Without translating word for word, mediate the information into English for an international project partner. Keep the purpose and privacy safeguards clear.

Possible opening: The school wants participation to remain voluntary. Students are not expected to disclose family histories, and ...

Feedback after the simulation

Use observable evidence. Do not give feedback such as good English or more vocabulary without an example.

Criterion	Evidence question	Next-step question
Task fulfilment and content	Did the speaker answer the operator, structure ideas, use evidence and make meaningful material links?	Which analytical or evaluative move would deepen the response?
Strategy, interaction and discourse	Did the speaker react, ask, develop, challenge, clarify and keep the dialogue moving?	Which interaction move was missing or overused?
Language	Was grammar mostly controlled, vocabulary precise, speech fluent and pronunciation intelligible?	Which repeated pattern would improve clarity most if corrected?

Feedback protocol

Quote or paraphrase one successful moment.
Name the criterion it demonstrates.
Identify one missed opportunity.
Give one concrete alternative phrase or move.
Set one target for the next run.

Error analysis

Classify errors before correcting them.

Error type	Example	Repair strategy
content gap	material mentioned but not interpreted	add This suggests ... because ...
evidence gap	broad claim without support	link to a source, example or course concept
interaction gap	answer ignores partner’s point	begin by paraphrasing or qualifying the partner
vocabulary gap	repeated good, bad, important	replace with precise evaluative language
grammar pattern	repeated tense or agreement error	practise one pattern in short oral drills
fluency problem	long silent search for one word	paraphrase and continue

Do not stop after every error. In a communication exam, intelligibility, coherence and interaction matter alongside accuracy.

Writing transfer

The communication exam is oral, but short writing can sharpen later speaking.

Write a 180–220 word reflection memo after your simulation:

Which one change would most improve my next performance, and what evidence from this attempt supports that decision?

Include one example from the monologue and one from the dialogue. Do not ask an AI system to write the memo for you.

KI, Quellen und Datenschutz

Do the material analysis and first speaking attempt yourself.
If you later use AI for feedback, check every factual claim and source independently.
Never treat generated quotations, page references or statistics as reliable without verification.
Do not use AI to produce a replacement monologue or complete model answer that you memorise.
If AI support was used for a school task, follow your school’s rules for disclosure.
Do not upload private recordings, names, faces or personal migration stories without explicit consent.
External AI access is not required for this aiMOOC.
For practice data in this course, assume names and numbers are fictional unless a source is explicitly given.

Differenzierung Leistungsfach

Support

Use the six-part monologue table, the interaction moves and a prepared vocabulary map.

Core

Connect at least two materials and include one counterargument or limitation.

LF+

Add a second course connection, analyse ambiguity or perspective, distinguish historical from contemporary evidence and evaluate the limits of your own interpretation.

Challenge

Repeat the exam with a new prompt but reduce notes to twelve keywords.

Abi-Check

Before you finish, check:

Did I answer the operator rather than a topic I preferred?
Did I analyse instead of merely describe?
Did I connect at least two pieces of material?
Did I distinguish evidence, inference and evaluation?
Did I use course knowledge selectively and accurately?
Did I keep my monologue coherent for about five minutes?
Did I respond directly to my partner in the dialogue?
Did I use clarification, qualification and negotiation?
Did I speak clearly enough to be understood throughout?
Did I finish with a reasoned conclusion or joint result?

Transfer

Run the same format with a new claim:

“Cross-cultural encounters change both newcomers and established communities.”

Use one new freely licensed visual and create a small fictional dataset. Label all invented numbers clearly. Keep the preparation time at 15 minutes and maintain the same feedback criteria.

Folgekurs

Interaktive Aufgaben

Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen

How long is the preparation time for the 2027 communication exam? (15 minutes) (!5 minutes) (!10 minutes) (!30 minutes)

What is the approximate length of the monologue per candidate? (About 5 minutes) (!About 2 minutes) (!About 10 minutes) (!About 15 minutes)

What is the minimum total duration of a tandem exam? (20 minutes) (!10 minutes) (!15 minutes) (!30 minutes)

Which combination is allowed during the preparation phase? (One monolingual and one bilingual dictionary) (!Internet access and a dictionary) (!A translation app and notes from class) (!Any digital reference tool)

Which is one official assessment area? (Task fulfilment and content) (!Handwriting quality) (!Number of quotations memorised) (!Length of written notes)

What should a strong dialogue demonstrate? (Active response and development of the partner’s ideas) (!Two independent mini-speeches) (!Avoidance of disagreement) (!Memorised answers only)

What should you do with a visual source first? (Observe before interpreting) (!Invent the people’s feelings) (!Ignore composition) (!Replace it with course knowledge)

What characterises Leistungsfach work in this module? (Deeper analysis and independent material connections) (!Shorter answers than Basisfach) (!Pure factual recall) (!Avoiding AFB III)

How should fictional practice statistics be used? (Only as clearly labelled simulation data) (!As real evidence in essays) (!As official ministry data) (!As verified research findings)

What is the best use of AI in this course? (Checked feedback after your own attempt) (!A complete replacement speech) (!Invented sources for stronger arguments) (!Automatic uploading of recordings)

Memory

Monologue	coherent independent speaking
Dialogue	responsive interaction
Evidence	support for a claim
Qualification	limiting or refining a statement
Discourse marker	language that organises spoken ideas
Mediation	purpose-based transfer between languages

Drag and Drop

Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu.	Thema
Observation	identifying visible features before interpretation
Analysis	explaining how details create meaning
Connection	linking materials or course knowledge
Evaluation	weighing a claim with criteria and evidence
Negotiation	developing a joint solution in dialogue

Kreuzworträtsel

Coherence	What quality makes ideas form a clear and logical whole?
Interaction	What term describes active response between speakers?
Fluency	What word describes speaking with relatively smooth flow?
Register	What term describes language appropriate to situation and audience?
Evidence	What supports an analytical or evaluative claim?
Mediation	What skill transfers meaning appropriately between languages?

LearningApps

Lückentext

The preparation phase lasts

.

A candidate normally speaks monologically for about

.

The tandem examination lasts at least

overall.

The shared dialogic phase lasts about

.

During preparation, a monolingual and a bilingual

may be used.

A strong monologue moves beyond description toward

.

A strong dialogue depends on active

.

Claims should be supported by relevant

.

A speaker can refine an overgeneralised claim through

.

The final feedback should identify one concrete

.

Offene Aufgaben

Leicht

Speaking warm-up: Record a private 60-second answer to What does belonging mean to you in an academic context? Then listen once and mark only pauses longer than you wanted.
Vocabulary map: Create a one-page semantic map around belonging with word families, collocations and one English definition for each branch.
Visual analysis: Choose a freely licensed Commons image connected to movement or communication and write five observations without interpretation.
Discourse markers: Build ten phrase cards for adding, qualifying, disagreeing, clarifying and summarising.

Standard

Five-minute monologue: Complete Candidate A under real timing and use no more than one side of notes.
Dialogue practice: With a partner, discuss the five fictional project options for ten minutes and aim to use at least four different interaction moves.
Mediation practice: Create a short German school notice and mediate its core message orally into English without word-for-word translation.
Feedback protocol: Exchange criterion-based feedback with a partner and support each comment with one observable example.

Schwer

Tandem simulation: Run the entire 15-minute preparation plus both monologues and the shared dialogue under exam conditions.
Material redesign: Create a new exam set from one Commons image, one original micro-text and one clearly labelled fictional dataset; write up to three monologue prompts plus one dialogue task.
Perspective analysis: Compare how a historical migration image and a contemporary source construct belonging differently, paying attention to context and limits of inference.
Transfer challenge: Repeat the exam with only twelve keywords and add one spontaneous counterargument not prepared in advance.

Lernkontrolle

Materialverknüpfung: Explain how the historical image and fictional survey can support different interpretations of belonging without treating either as complete evidence.
Operatorentransfer: Transform a descriptive prompt into an analytical and then an evaluative prompt. Explain what changes in the expected response.
Dialogische Kompetenz: Given a partner statement you partly disagree with, formulate a response that first acknowledges, then qualifies and finally advances the discussion.
Fehlerpriorisierung: A speaker is fluent but vague, accurate but unresponsive, or analytical but difficult to understand. For each case, identify the highest-priority improvement and justify it.
Prüfungsstrategie: Design a 15-minute preparation plan for an unfamiliar visual plus quotation and justify how your timing supports AFB II and III.
Quellenkritik: Explain why fictional data, historical images and AI-generated information each require different forms of source checking.

Lernnachweis

Für einen Lernnachweis zu diesem Thema ist wichtig:

eine vollständige simulierte Vorbereitung unter 15-Minuten-Bedingungen
ein etwa fünfminütiger eigenständiger Monolog
ein dialogischer Teil mit nachweisbarer Reaktion auf den Partner
mindestens zwei explizite Materialverknüpfungen
eine differenzierte Analyse mit AFB-II-Anteilen
mindestens eine begründete Bewertung mit AFB-III-Anteilen
passende Verwendung von Kontextwortschatz und Diskursmarkern
ein kriteriengestütztes Feedback mit Belegen
eine kurze Fehleranalyse mit konkretem Folgeziel
transparente Kennzeichnung fiktiver Daten und geprüfter Quellen

OERs zum Thema

Die eingebundenen Commons-Dateien sind frei lizenziert bzw. gemeinfrei und über ihre Dateiseiten mit Lizenzangaben verknüpft. Die YouTube-Medien stammen aus offiziellen Bildungs- bzw. Originalkanälen und werden nur eingebettet; es werden keine vollständigen urheberrechtlich geschützten Pflichttexte oder unautorisierten Filmsequenzen kopiert.

Verknüpfte Lernbereiche

Englisch Abitur Baden-Württemberg

aiMOOC-Projekte

Frag mich zum aktuellen Lerninhalt oder wähle eine kurze Hilfe.

Textmodus bereit

Sprache