aiMOOC

ABI BF - Vollständige mündliche Englisch-Abiturprüfung simulieren

QR-Code

ABI BF - Vollständige mündliche Englisch-Abiturprüfung simulieren

Full mock oral exam first. Feedback later. Train the 2027 Baden-Württemberg English oral Abitur in the Basisfach: supervised preparation, a roughly ten-minute presentation and a roughly ten-minute examination conversation. The simulation uses a completely new, copyright-safe training text in an authentic journalistic form. In the real examination, the source text must be an authentic published text.

Zielgruppe: Englisch als fortgeführte Fremdsprache, Kursstufe Baden-Württemberg, Basisfach. Stand: 2 October 2026; Abiturjahrgang 2027. Die mündliche Englisch-Abiturprüfung findet nur statt, wenn Englisch entsprechend als mündliches Prüfungsfach gewählt wurde.

Media warm-up

Before reading the rules, answer aloud in English: What makes a ten-minute talk clear, analytical and convincing? Give yourself 45 seconds.

Viewing prompt: Watch a short section of Julian Treasure's TED talk and collect three delivery features you could transfer to an exam situation. Do not imitate the talk as a script; focus on voice, clarity and listener orientation.

I-can goals

I can speak for about ten minutes from notes without reading a manuscript.
I can analyse a new non-fiction text using evidence, structure, language and perspective.
I can respond spontaneously, explain, qualify and connect ideas in an examination conversation.
I can paraphrase when a word is missing and use a dictionary strategically during preparation.
I can evaluate my performance only after the complete simulation and identify one next step.

Official exam frame: Baden-Württemberg 2027

The current official rules for the 2027 Abitur state that the oral examination is an individual examination of about 20 minutes after about 20 minutes of supervised preparation. In modern foreign languages, the examination is conducted in the target language. The first part is a coherent talk of about ten minutes; the second part is an examination conversation.

For modern foreign languages, the official 2027 guidance specifies an authentic text of about 200–300 words, with source and word count, and one to at most three tasks. Monolingual and bilingual dictionaries are allowed in preparation; further aids are not. The topic may relate to the Schwerpunkt, but works from the Pflichtkanon may not be the text basis of the oral task. In the Basisfach, AFB I and II are emphasised more strongly than AFB III, and the conversation can broaden to content from different course semesters.

Official sources:

2027 English focus used for transfer: On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters plus the official USA/UK thematic fields. The simulation below does not reproduce a Pflichtkanon text.

Before you start: prior knowledge

Say one sentence for each stem:

A useful summary focuses on ...
An analysis goes beyond summary because ...
Evidence is strong when ...
In a discussion, I can qualify a claim by saying ...

If you cannot finish a stem, keep going. This is diagnosis, not feedback.

Full examination simulation

Rule: Do not open the feedback and error-analysis sections until you have completed preparation, presentation and examination conversation. If you record yourself, do so voluntarily and locally/private. Do not upload recordings. No external AI tool is needed.

Part A: 20-minute preparation

Training condition: Set a 20-minute timer. Use only the text, the tasks, paper, pen and—if you want to mirror the official allowance—a monolingual and/or bilingual dictionary.

Dictionary image: Cullen328, CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons.

Dictionary order: context first → word formation → English definition → dictionary → German help only if still necessary.

Suggested timing scaffold, not an official rule:

Minutes 0–3: read tasks, identify topic, thesis and text movement.
Minutes 3–8: prepare task 1 in keywords.
Minutes 8–14: prepare task 2 with 2–3 precise pieces of evidence.
Minutes 14–18: prepare task 3 and one counterpoint.
Minutes 18–20: create a speaking route with opening, transitions and closing.

New training text

Two towns, one table: community dinners turn arrival into conversation

Training source: original OER simulation text created for this aiMOOC, 2026. All names, organisations and numerical data are fictional. Word count: 247 words excluding title. The form imitates an authentic newspaper feature. In the real Abitur, the official requirement is an authentic published text of about 200–300 words.

When the small English town of Linton opened its old market hall for monthly community dinners, organisers expected people to come for the food. They were more surprised by what happened between the courses. Teenagers translated jokes for grandparents, long-term residents compared family recipes with recent arrivals, and people who had lived on the same street for years finally learned one another’s names.

The project, called Shared Table, was started by a local library and three volunteer groups. Each evening, six cooks prepare inexpensive dishes connected to places that matter to them. Guests do not sit with the people they arrived with. Instead, volunteers mix the tables and place simple conversation cards between the plates.

Organiser Maya Brooks says the aim is not to make everyone agree. “Belonging is not the same as becoming identical,” she explains. “A good evening gives people a reason to ask a respectful second question.”

A fictional follow-up survey of 68 guests found that most participants had spoken to someone from a different cultural background during the dinner. However, the organisers stress that one friendly meal cannot prove long-term integration. Some guests also said that being asked to explain a tradition made them feel as if they had to represent an entire culture.

For student volunteer Ben Okafor, that tension is exactly why the project matters. He sees the dinners as a starting point: a place where curiosity can become conversation, but where listening has to continue after the plates are cleared.

Examination tasks

Outline how the article presents the aims and limits of the Shared Table project.
Analyse how structure, choice of examples and language shape the reader's view of cross-cultural encounters.
Assess to what extent low-threshold community activities can create a sense of belonging in culturally diverse communities.

Write keywords only. Build a coherent talk rather than three isolated mini-answers.

Part B: ten-minute presentation

Start the timer. Speak in English for about ten minutes. Do not stop to correct every language mistake.

A useful route is: brief introduction → focused outline → analysis with evidence → assessment with counterpoint → concise conclusion. This is a scaffold, not a model answer.

Do not read the next section until the talk is finished.

Part C: ten-minute examination conversation

Ask a partner or teacher to use the prompts one by one. If you work alone, reveal one prompt, answer aloud for about 45–90 seconds, then move on.

How might a community project avoid reducing people to cultural stereotypes?
Is belonging mainly created through shared activities, shared values or shared institutions? Explain.
What does the article suggest about the difference between contact and integration?
How could the same project work differently in a large city?
When can curiosity become intrusive rather than respectful?
Connect the text to the 2027 focus On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters without referring to a Pflichtkanon text as your source.
Which role can language play in cross-cultural encounters besides transmitting information?
Give one reason why the project's apparent success should be interpreted cautiously.

The examiner may ask follow-up questions, request clarification, challenge a claim or move to a related course topic. Respond, qualify and connect rather than reciting memorised content.

Simulation complete? Only now continue to feedback.

Feedback after the full simulation

The official 2027 rubric distinguishes task fulfilment/content and language performance/strategy. Use the following learner-friendly check only after finishing the whole simulation.

Area	Check	Evidence from your performance
Task fulfilment	Did I address all three tasks and stay relevant?	Note one strong and one missing point.
Analysis	Did I explain effects, not just name devices?	Write one evidence → effect → purpose chain.
Structure	Could a listener follow my line of thought?	Name your clearest transition.
Language	Was I understandable, appropriately precise and varied?	Record one useful phrase and one recurring error.
Delivery	Did pace, pronunciation and intonation support meaning?	Identify one moment that sounded natural.
Interaction	Did I answer the actual question, extend ideas and react flexibly?	Note one successful spontaneous response.

Feedback sentence frame: One thing I already control is ... because ... . My next high-value change is ... . I will practise it by ... .

Error analysis

Do not rewrite the entire talk. Select a small number of errors that matter for meaning, accuracy or fluency.

Type	My example	Better version	Why?
Content			Relevance / missing evidence / overclaim
Vocabulary			Collocation / register / precision
Grammar			Tense / agreement / syntax
Pronunciation			Stress / sound / ending
Interaction			Clarification / qualification / response to challenge

Skill stations

Listening and viewing

This Cambridge video is not the Baden-Württemberg Abitur format. Use it only to observe transferable speaking strategies: extending an answer, organising turns and using useful expressions.

Viewing task: Watch a short section of Julien S. Bourrelle's TEDx talk. Note one example of perspective-taking and one claim you would question or qualify. Then summarise the idea in 30 seconds without copying wording.

Reading: the three-pass method

Pass 1 – gist: What is the central issue and overall stance?
Pass 2 – structure: How does the text move from example to evidence to qualification?
Pass 3 – analysis: Which choices guide the reader's response, and with what effect?

Do not translate line by line. Read for function.

Context vocabulary and word formation

Word	English explanation	Word family / useful partner	German help last
belonging	feeling accepted as part of a group or place	belong, sense of belonging	Zugehörigkeit
encounter	a meeting or interaction, often with something unfamiliar	encounter, cross-cultural encounter	Begegnung
intrusive	entering someone's private space in an unwelcome way	intrude, intrusion, intrusive question	aufdringlich
qualify a claim	make a statement more precise and less absolute	qualification, qualified statement	eine Aussage einschränken
evidence	information used to support an interpretation or claim	evident, evidence-based	Beleg
perspective	a particular way of seeing or interpreting something	perspective-taking	Perspektive

Word-building challenge: culture → cultural → culturally; integrate → integration → integrative; represent → representation → representative. Use one form from each family in a new sentence.

Analysis: evidence → effect → purpose

Use this mini-frame:

Evidence: identify a short textual feature or example.
Effect: explain what it makes the reader notice, feel or question.
Purpose: connect the effect to the text's overall message or perspective.

Avoid device spotting. A precise explanation of one feature is better than a list of labels.

Speaking: flexible language

Useful sentence starters:

Signposting: I would like to focus on ...
Evidence: This becomes clear when the article ...
Qualification: That is convincing to an extent; however ...
Clarification: What I mean by that is ...
Interaction: I see the point, but I would distinguish between ...
Recovery: Let me rephrase that ...

Writing transfer

Write a 180–220 word reflection in English: Which is harder in oral exams: having ideas, structuring ideas or expressing ideas spontaneously? Use one example from your simulation. Do not submit a replacement essay generated by AI; the learning goal is your own formulation.

Mediation transfer

A German-speaking classmate asks what the 2027 oral English exam expects. Explain the most relevant points in 120–150 words of natural English. Do not translate official wording sentence by sentence; select, structure and adapt information to the addressee.

Help ladder

Use only as much help as you need:

Level 1: underline task verbs and key nouns.
Level 2: use a three-column note sheet: point | evidence | meaning.
Level 3: use the speaking route from Part B.
Level 4: consult a monolingual dictionary.
Level 5: consult a bilingual dictionary or short German explanation.

Basisfach means manageable material, exemplarisches Arbeiten and more visible structure support—not lower expectations for secure understanding and communication.

Differentiation for Basisfach practice

Need	Adjustment outside the full mock
More structure	Use the speaking route and prepare only two evidence–effect–purpose chains before adding a third.
Language support	Keep the English sentence starters visible and use the dictionary ladder before German help.
Slower pace	Practise a six-minute talk first, then return to the full ten-minute simulation.
Stronger challenge	Remove sentence starters, add one counterargument and connect to a second course-semester topic.
Analysis support	Work with one paragraph at a time and explain one effect precisely before adding terminology.

The full mock itself should still be completed under the stated 20-minute preparation and approximately 10 + 10 minute examination timing.

AI and source check

If you use AI during practice, label its contribution and verify every factual claim against reliable sources. Never treat an AI answer as an official examination rule. For this course, official exam conditions come from the Baden-Württemberg Facherlass, AGVO and Bildungsplan. Your own analysis and wording remain the learning product.

Recordings are optional and should stay private unless you deliberately choose otherwise. Do not upload classmates' voices or personal data. Do not send material to external AI services without consent and a clear educational purpose.

Transfer

Create a second mock oral exam with a different 200–300 word text type and a different course topic. Keep the same exam logic: gist or outline, analysis, then a limited evaluative transfer. The source for a real exam task must be authentic; for open OER practice, use legally reusable or newly written material and label it correctly.

Abi check

You are ready for another full run when you can answer yes to most of these:

I can prepare in 20 minutes without writing a script.
I can speak for close to ten minutes with a visible line of argument.
I can support analysis with precise evidence.
I can react to follow-up questions without switching to German.
I can paraphrase missing vocabulary.
I can distinguish a factual source statement from my own interpretation.
I know that the real text is authentic, about 200–300 words and not a Pflichtkanon work used as the task basis.

Follow-up course

Continue with a second simulation that changes topic, text type and question style. Recommended internal links: Englisch Abitur, Textanalyse Englisch, Speaking, Mediation, Interkulturelle kommunikative Kompetenz, Operatoren Englisch, Abitur Baden-Württemberg.

Interaktive Aufgaben

Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen

How long is the supervised preparation time in the 2027 oral exam usually? (About 20 minutes) (!About 5 minutes) (!About 45 minutes) (!About 90 minutes)

What follows the roughly ten-minute presentation? (An examination conversation) (!A written grammar test) (!A second preparation phase) (!A listening dictation)

What is the usual length of the authentic source text in a modern foreign language oral exam? (About 200 to 300 words) (!About 50 to 80 words) (!About 500 to 700 words) (!About 1000 words)

Which aid is allowed during preparation according to the 2027 guidance? (A monolingual and a bilingual dictionary) (!An internet search engine) (!A generative AI assistant) (!A complete course notebook)

What should a strong analysis do? (Explain how evidence creates an effect and supports a purpose) (!List as many stylistic devices as possible) (!Retell the whole text in detail) (!Translate every sentence into German)

What is emphasised more strongly in the Basisfach? (AFB I and AFB II) (!Only AFB III) (!Only memorised quotations) (!Only grammar terminology)

Can a Pflichtkanon work be the text basis of the oral task? (No) (!Yes always) (!Only if the candidate asks) (!Only in the first five minutes)

What is a useful response when you cannot find the exact word? (Paraphrase the idea in English) (!Stop speaking) (!Switch immediately to German) (!Invent an English-looking word)

When should you use the feedback section in this simulation? (After preparation presentation and conversation are complete) (!Before reading the text) (!During the presentation) (!Before starting the timer)

What should you do with AI-generated factual claims used in practice? (Check them against reliable sources) (!Assume they are official) (!Memorise them without checking) (!Use them as a replacement answer)

Memory

preparation	supervised note-making before the oral exam
outline	concise presentation of central content
analysis	explanation of how textual choices create meaning
qualification	making a claim more precise and less absolute
paraphrase	expressing an idea with different words
interaction	responding flexibly to questions and follow-ups

Drag and Drop

Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu.	Thema
Gist reading	Identify central issue and stance
Evidence selection	Mark short relevant textual support
Analysis	Connect feature effect and purpose
Presentation	Develop a coherent spoken line
Conversation	Respond qualify connect and clarify

Kreuzworträtsel

coherence	What quality makes a talk easy to follow logically?
register	What term describes a level or style of language suited to a situation?
evidence	What supports an interpretation with material from the text?
dictionary	Which reference tool may be used in preparation?
perspective	What term describes a particular way of seeing an issue?
interaction	What skill involves reacting meaningfully to another speaker?

LearningApps

Lückentext

Offene Aufgaben

Leicht

Speaking Warm-up: Record a private 60-second answer to one conversation question and listen once for clarity, not perfection.
Vocabulary Map: Create a small word-family map for belong, integrate, represent and encounter.
Signposting Cards: Design six cue cards with one useful English transition on each card.
Visual Summary: Draw a one-page visual of the 20-minute preparation process without full sentences.

Standard

Text Analysis: Select one paragraph of the simulation text and create three evidence–effect–purpose chains.
Examiner Practice: In pairs, conduct a five-minute follow-up conversation using only open questions and clarification prompts.
Listening Log: Watch one embedded video and note three transferable speaking strategies plus one limitation of the video for Baden-Württemberg.
Mediation: Explain the exam format in concise English to a fictional exchange student using only verified official information.

Schwer

Mock Exam Design: Create a new Basisfach task with an openly licensed or correctly linked authentic text and up to three exam tasks.
Perspective Comparison: Compare two contrasting perspectives on belonging and formulate a balanced two-minute response.
Source Audit: Check five statements about the oral Abitur against the official 2027 Facherlass and AGVO and document the exact source location.
Full Simulation: Conduct a second complete 20 plus 10 plus 10 minute simulation on another course topic and create a one-page error profile afterwards.

Lernkontrolle

Transferanalyse: Explain how the same article could lead to two different reasonable interpretations depending on which evidence a speaker selects.
Prüfungsgespräch: Respond to a challenge that contradicts your position, then reformulate your claim so that it becomes more precise without simply abandoning it.
Materialkritik: Evaluate the limits of the fictional survey in the training text and explain what additional evidence would be needed for a stronger conclusion.
Sprachstrategie: Demonstrate three different ways to recover when a key word is missing and discuss which one best preserves fluency.
Prüfungsdesign: Explain why a Basisfach task should be manageable in material scope while still allowing analysis, transfer and spontaneous communication.
Quellenkompetenz: Distinguish official exam rules, teacher-made scaffolds and learner strategies in this aiMOOC and justify why the distinction matters.

Lernnachweis

For a successful learning record, document:

one complete timed simulation with private notes or a self-observation sheet;
one evidence–effect–purpose analysis;
one vocabulary and paraphrase strategy;
one structured self-feedback after the full simulation;
one source check using the official 2027 Baden-Württemberg documents;
one transfer task with a new topic.

No external media, embeds or scripts are required for the learning record itself.

OERs zum Thema

Use Wikipedia for orientation, not as the final authority on current examination regulations. For current rules, use the official Baden-Württemberg sources listed above.

Verknüpfte Lernbereiche

Mündliche Englisch-Abiturprüfung

aiMOOC-Projekte

Inhalte werden geladen ...

Mediathek wird aus dem Wiki geladen ...

Frag mich zum aktuellen Lerninhalt oder wähle eine kurze Hilfe.

Textmodus bereit

Sprache