Aging/Research status: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Glanz (Diskussion | Beiträge) Aging daily 9d3dc6b6ab424facafd8602ef0da0575 b242df399868 |
Glanz (Diskussion | Beiträge) Aging daily 286609ebd48d4bca9de61efeae9935d4 b242df399868 |
||
| Zeile 1: | Zeile 1: | ||
__NOTOC__ | __NOTOC__ | ||
<div class="aging-research-world" lang="en" | <div class="aging-research-world aging-journal" lang="en"> | ||
< | <div class="aj-masthead"><div class="aj-brand"><span class="aj-monogram">[[Aging|a.]]</span><span>[[Aging|AGING]]<small>RESEARCH IN PROGRESS</small></span></div><div class="aging-languages" role="navigation" aria-label="Sprache / Language"><span class="aging-language" title="Deutsch">[[Altern/Forschungsstatus|🇩🇪]]</span><span class="aging-language" title="English">[[Aging/Research status|🇬🇧]]</span></div></div> | ||
<div class="aj-context"><strong>An evolving AI research project</strong>[[Aging/About the project|Background · goals · methods]]<span>Updated 28 Sep 2026</span></div> | |||
<h1>Project status and scientific evidence</h1> | |||
<div class="aj-deck">Connect the literature. Challenge assumptions. Understand function.</div> | |||
<div class="aj-article"> | |||
Colour describes significance within this project, not the probability that a claim is true. Level 1 does not turn an individual animal finding into established human knowledge. Every major claim also specifies model, design, evidence strength and limitations. | Colour describes significance within this project, not the probability that a claim is true. Level 1 does not turn an individual animal finding into established human knowledge. Every major claim also specifies model, design, evidence strength and limitations. | ||
| Zeile 33: | Zeile 35: | ||
Every upgrade needs a separate critical review. Downgrades and corrections retain dated reasons. Never describe a result as a proven breakthrough without independent confirmation. | Every upgrade needs a separate critical review. Downgrades and corrections retain dated reasons. Never describe a result as a proven breakthrough without independent confirmation. | ||
---- | </div> | ||
<div class="aj-section-title"><h2>Continue exploring</h2></div><div class="aj-tiles"><div class="aj-tile"><div class="aj-thumb">[[File:Bovine Pulmonary Artery Endothelial Cells Fluorescent Image.jpg|120px|frameless|link=Aging/Approaches to aging|alt=Fluorescence micrograph of bovine endothelial cells with labeled nuclei, actin and mitochondria.]]</div><div><div class="aj-tile-title">[[Aging/Approaches to aging|Approaches to aging]]</div><div class="aj-tile-desc">Evidence and functional outcomes</div></div></div><div class="aj-tile"><div class="aj-thumb aj-type-thumb">[[Aging/Evidence chain|→]]</div><div><div class="aj-tile-title">[[Aging/Evidence chain|Evidence chain]]</div><div class="aj-tile-desc">How studies generate new questions</div></div></div><div class="aj-tile"><div class="aj-thumb">[[File:DNA double helix.svg|120px|frameless|link=Aging/Research colloquium|alt=Schematic illustration of a DNA double helix.]]</div><div><div class="aj-tile-title">[[Aging/Research colloquium|Research colloquium]]</div><div class="aj-tile-desc">16 foundation assignments + 4 new deep dives</div></div></div></div> | |||
<div class="aj-footer"><div class="aj-brand"><span class="aj-monogram">[[Aging|a.]]</span><span>[[Aging|AGING]]<small>RESEARCH IN PROGRESS</small></span></div><div class="aj-context">[[Aging|Project overview]][[Aging/About the project|Goals & methods]][[Aging/Evidence chain|Evidence chain]]</div><div class="aj-meta">AI-assisted literature research and model building. No laboratory or clinical studies conducted by this project. No personal treatment plans.</div><div class="aj-credits">Image credits · Illustrations, not project data: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Axolotl_Portrait.jpg Axolotl] — LoKiLeCh ([https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ CC BY-SA 3.0]) · [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:XBio_illustration_%E2%80%93_Neuron.png Neuron] — explorebiology (Explore Biology) ([https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC BY 4.0]) · [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DNA_double_helix.svg DNA] — Biochemlife ([https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ CC BY-SA 4.0]) · [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bovine_Pulmonary_Artery_Endothelial_Cells_Fluorescent_Image.jpg Bovine endothelial cells] — Erin Rod ([https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC BY 4.0])</div></div> | |||
</div> | </div> | ||
[[Category:Altern / Aging]] | [[Category:Altern / Aging]] | ||
Aktuelle Version vom 28. September 2026, 23:29 Uhr
An evolving AI research projectBackground · goals · methodsUpdated 28 Sep 2026
Project status and scientific evidence
Connect the literature. Challenge assumptions. Understand function.
Colour describes significance within this project, not the probability that a claim is true. Level 1 does not turn an individual animal finding into established human knowledge. Every major claim also specifies model, design, evidence strength and limitations.
- ⚪ Level 1 – Scientifically grounded: Grounded in credible literature; no special new insight from this AI project.
- 🔵 Level 2 – Notable insight / strong hypothesis: Relevant connection, research gap or synthesis; further testing required.
- 🟢 Level 3 – Breakthrough in a target or sub-question: Substantial new result for a specific question; project assessment, not automatic confirmation.
- 🟣 Level 4 – Major research breakthrough: Several independent evidence lines; intensive checks of counterarguments, alternatives and reproducibility.
- 🟡 Level 5 – Potentially fundamental discovery: Extremely rare; potentially fundamental significance, explicitly not yet scientific confirmation.
Four knowledge categories
- Established knowledge: robust, bounded consensus; state its scope.
- Promising indications: consistent but still insufficient evidence.
- Experimental results: findings from a named experiment; specify model, endpoint and replication.
- Hypotheses: testable explanations or predictions, not observed facts.
Evidence strength
High / moderate / low / not assessed, always with a rationale. Assess causality, generalisability and clinical relevance separately. Multiple methods within one paper are not independent external replication. Inspect original studies first, use systematic reviews and meta-analyses for context, and clinical trials for human efficacy claims. Rank, journal prestige and AI confidence cannot replace quality appraisal.
Required dossier for levels 3–5
- What exactly is new? Document the prior-art search.
- Which sources and data support the rating?
- What did the AI itself infer?
- What competing explanations and counterevidence exist?
- Which experiment could confirm or falsify the inference?
- Has it been independently reproduced? By whom, with what data?
- How confident is the assessment, and why?
Every upgrade needs a separate critical review. Downgrades and corrections retain dated reasons. Never describe a result as a proven breakthrough without independent confirmation.
Continue exploring
Evidence and functional outcomes
How studies generate new questions
16 foundation assignments + 4 new deep dives
