Zum Inhalt springen

Aging

Aus MOOCsWiki Staging
Die Druckversion wird nicht mehr unterstützt und kann Darstellungsfehler aufweisen. Bitte aktualisiere deine Browser-Lesezeichen und verwende stattdessen die Standard-Druckfunktion des Browsers.
a.AGINGRESEARCH IN PROGRESS
An evolving AI research projectBackground · goals · methodsUpdated 28 Sep 2026

Aging — an evolving AI research project

Which biological mechanisms can demonstrably slow or partly reverse age-related functional decline in humans?

Clear harmful proteins. Preserve working synapses?

We connect published studies of TIMP2, microglia and protein turnover. We seek a mechanism that clears harmful cargo while preserving neuronal function. This connection remains an unconfirmed working hypothesis.

Photographic portrait of an axolotl.
The axolotl as a model for regeneration. Not evidence of human rejuvenation.
Mouse; genetic interventions and TIMP2 administration

TIMP2 changes how microglia handle cargo

TIMP2 affected microglial states and cargo processing in mice. The study also includes a myelin clearance assay following genetic deletion.

Selective removal of harmful synaptic cargo as a cause of functional recovery remains unresolved.
Hemmer, Philippi et al. · 12 Aug 2026
Mouse; neuron-specific protein labeling

Protein stock does not establish degradation flux

Neuronal labeling tracks slowly degraded proteins into microglia. For our model, the key issue is that increased stored cargo can have different causes.

Uptake, degradation and export require separate measurement; this is our methodological inference.
Guldner et al. · 21 Jan 2026
C57BL/6 and SAMP8 mice

Better markers do not establish memory recovery

Urolithin A improved molecular measurements in aged C57BL/6 mice without demonstrating recovery in the memory tests examined.

Early/late comparisons also differ by mouse strain. They establish neither a universal timing window nor proven absence of an effect.
Jara et al. · 5 Mar 2026

Ten entries distinguish human functional outcomes, preclinical candidates and hypotheses. LIFE, FINGER and US POINTER provide human benchmarks, without establishing a solution to biological aging.

Explore the list →

Each new study should strengthen, constrain or change a specific claim. Independent evidence routes, counterevidence and missing links remain visible. This project conducts no experiments.

Follow the argument →

16 foundation assignments and 4 new deep dives: challenge causal models, critically read published data and connect conflicting studies. Substantive new findings become dated addition packages with their own Wish-List entries.

Explore the research journal

Photographic portrait of an axolotl.
Tissues · organs · nervous system
Schematic illustration of a neuron with its parts labeled.
Proteostasis · synapses · function
Schematic illustration of a DNA double helix.
Causes and interactions
Fluorescence micrograph of bovine endothelial cells with labeled nuclei, actin and mitochondria.
Findings that change the next question
Findings, sources and new inferences
Critically explore connections
Fluorescence micrograph of bovine endothelial cells with labeled nuclei, actin and mitochondria.
Effects, limitations and evidence
Schematic illustration of a DNA double helix.
Tools for causal understanding
The decisive knowledge gaps
Proposals with falsification criteria
Primary studies and evidence
Explicitly assess counterevidence
Schematic illustration of a neuron with its parts labeled.
An accessible entry into biology
Schematic illustration of a DNA double helix.
Models, methods and translation
Project status · Read significance and evidence separately
⚪ 1 · Scientifically grounded🔵 2 · Insight / strong hypothesis🟢 3 · Breakthrough in a subproblem🟣 4 · Major research breakthrough🟡 5 · Potential fundamental discovery
Currently levels 1 and 2. Levels 3–5 have not been reached; no rating replaces independent scientific confirmation. All criteria →

Researchers explain the foundations

Institutional talks for context. These older videos are background material; current claims rely on the linked primary studies.

Axolotl regeneration

Science Communication Lab · 2018-02 (recorded) · Elly Tanaka examines the experimental questions behind axolotl regeneration. Recorded in 2018; English, 27:57. Use it as methodological background and compare it with the world's current studies.
YouTube

Brain aging in its systemic context

Stanford · 2016-11-10 · Tony Wyss-Coray discusses systemic influences on the aging brain. Stanford lecture, published November 10, 2016; English. Historical research background; results in old mice do not establish efficacy in humans.
YouTube


22 selected primary studies, including one labeled preprint. Targeted, non-exhaustive research. Findings, inferences and open hypotheses remain distinct. Study register →