Die Druckversion wird nicht mehr unterstützt und kann Darstellungsfehler aufweisen. Bitte aktualisiere deine Browser-Lesezeichen und verwende stattdessen die Standard-Druckfunktion des Browsers.

aiMOOC

ABI LF - Non-fiction exam challenge

QR-Code

ABI LF - Non-fiction exam challenge

Mini-Beschreibung: Tackle a fresh, demanding non-fiction text under exam-style conditions: first an aspect-focused summary, then a text-based analysis, followed by either personal writing or creative writing. Target group: English Leistungsfach, Kursstufe Baden-Württemberg.

English first. German support appears only after context clues, word families, visualisation, English explanation and dictionary work. The aim is independent reading, analysis and writing rather than a model essay.

Einleitung

This aiMOOC trains the complete non-fiction workflow for the Leistungsfach: listen and view, read an unseen text, select evidence, explain effects, write independently, review errors and transfer strategies to a new source. The input is deliberately compact; the practice load is high.

Integrity and privacy: The challenge uses an original practice text and clearly marked fictional data. Recordings are voluntary and should stay private. Do not upload names, voices, copyrighted exam material or personal data. No external AI access is required. Under exam simulation, do not use generative AI. If AI is used later for reflection with teacher permission, treat every output as an unverified claim, check sources and never submit AI-generated replacement essays.

Media entry: Read the room

Look at the exam image above for 45 seconds. Then answer in English: What can be controlled before an exam, what can only be managed during it, and what would count as a useful routine rather than a superstition?

Media prompt: Use the image as a visual trigger: infer the setting, identify visible signs of concentration and write one sentence about what an exam image cannot tell you. This separates observation from inference — a key analysis habit.

I-can goals

Skill	By the end, I can ...
Listening / Viewing	identify claims, examples, tone and communicative purpose in an unfamiliar source.
Reading	distinguish thesis, line of argument, evidence, concession and implication in a demanding non-fiction text.
Summary	produce an aspect-focused, objective and compressed account in my own words.
Analysis	connect textual evidence with method, effect, audience and purpose instead of listing devices.
Writing	develop a coherent personal response or an appropriate creative target text with material reference.
Speaking	present a structured monologue and sustain a purposeful dialogue.
Media literacy	verify sources, statistics and AI-generated claims before relying on them.

Prior knowledge

Complete this quick grid before reading the challenge text.

Prompt	Your 20-second answer
What makes a summary different from an analysis?	...
What is a line of argument?	...
Name two ways writers shape credibility.	...
What makes evidence relevant rather than merely impressive?	...
What do you check before trusting a statistic?	...

Official Abi check 2027: Baden-Württemberg

Status checked: 2 October 2026. For the upcoming 2027 examination cohort, the official Facherlass and correction rules apply. If you sit the exam in a later year, re-check the current documents.

Area	2027 Leistungsfach
Written main date	Friday, 30 April 2027.
Part I	Listening comprehension, about 30 minutes.
Break	15 minutes.
Part II	225 minutes including choice time; two task sets are offered for selection.
Part II.1	Aspect-focused reading summary.
Part II.2	Analysis based on the text; for non-fiction this may focus on structure and line of argument, use of language and communicative strategies.
Part II.3	Choice between a personal response and a creative writing task; possible creative target types include article, blog entry, email, letter, letter to the editor and speech manuscript.
Permitted aids	Monolingual English dictionary, bilingual English-German / German-English dictionary and a German spelling reference.
Weighting	Listening 20 percent, writing 55 percent, communication exam 25 percent.
Communication exam	15 minutes preparation; individual exam at least 15 minutes or tandem exam at least 20 minutes; roughly 5 minutes monologue and 10 minutes dialogue.
Leistungsfach profile	Greater complexity, abstraction, breadth, depth and differentiation; the course targets B2 and in parts C1.

Important distinction: This MOOC mainly rehearses the written non-fiction route. The Kommunikationsprüfung is a separate oral component. Mediation remains an important course skill, but it is not one of the two components of the 2027 written final exam, which consists of listening and writing.

Current 2027 content frame: The official focus includes On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters plus the specified USA and UK topic fields. The compulsory works remain copyrighted; this MOOC does not reproduce them or unauthorised film sequences.

Official sources: Ministry overview · Facherlass 2027 · Detailplan 2027 · Bildungsplan text and media competence · IQB English operators

Listening and Viewing

Listening sprint: rhetoric

First viewing: Listen for the big idea only. Second viewing: note one example each of credibility, logic and emotion. Third step: explain which appeal would be most relevant when analysing a serious opinion article and why. The goal is not to label every sentence but to connect rhetorical choices with audience and purpose.

Viewing sprint: source checking

After viewing, write a two-sentence rule for yourself: one sentence on tracing a claim back to its source and one sentence on comparing independent coverage.

Reading challenge

Practice text: original for this aiMOOC. Author, publication, people and numerical data below are fictional. The text may therefore be used for practice without reproducing a compulsory work.

The Friction We Need by Nora Vale, Learning & Public Life, 14 September 2026 — fictional

P1 A good tool should save time. That sounds almost too obvious to argue with. Yet in classrooms, the fastest route to an answer can quietly become the longest route to understanding. A student opens a demanding article, meets three unfamiliar phrases, and asks an AI assistant for a neat summary before reading the original. Five minutes later, the argument seems clear. What has been gained is speed. What may have been lost is the chance to notice uncertainty, contradiction and the small clues that make a writer’s position more complicated than a headline.

P2 The debate is often framed as a choice between prohibition and permission: either schools ban automated assistance or students use it whenever they like. That is a false and unhelpful binary. The more useful question is one of sequence. Which thinking should happen before a tool enters the process, and which thinking can a tool genuinely extend?

P3 A fictional pilot at Northbridge Sixth Form illustrates the distinction. In four classes, 240 students worked with the same unfamiliar article. One group read and annotated without digital assistance. A second group received an automated summary before reading. A third group read first, wrote down the author’s main claim and two doubts, and only then used an AI tool to challenge their interpretation. In a later transfer task, the third group identified unsupported claims 18 percent more often than the summary-first group. Curiously, the summary-first group reported the highest confidence. These invented figures prove nothing, but the pattern poses a useful question: can convenience increase certainty faster than judgment?

P4 This is not an argument against technology. Dictionaries, captions, translation tools and well-designed prompts can reduce pointless barriers. A learner should not have to spend ten minutes guessing a technical term that a reliable dictionary can clarify in thirty seconds. Nor should a student with an accessibility need be forced to struggle with a format that hides rather than reveals meaning. Assistance can open the door to a text.

P5 But opening the door is different from walking through it. Some difficulty is productive because it forces decisions. When two interpretations both seem plausible, you must weigh evidence. When a paragraph shifts from data to anecdote, you must ask why. When a writer concedes a counterargument and then narrows it, you must track how the concession changes the tone. Those acts of judgment are not obstacles around learning; they are part of learning.

P6 The difference, then, is between productive friction and pointless friction. A blurry photocopy is pointless friction. Choosing the most precise paraphrase is productive friction. Searching for the page on which a quotation appears may be pointless; deciding whether the quotation actually supports the claim is productive. Efficient tools should remove the first kind without erasing the second.

P7 Schools and students are understandably attracted to visible efficiency. Minutes saved can be counted. Pages completed can be counted. Correct answers can be counted. Judgment is slower and less photogenic. It appears in a cautious qualification, a better question, a revised interpretation, or the decision not to use a dramatic statistic because its source cannot be verified. None of these looks impressive on a progress dashboard, yet each may signal deeper learning.

P8 The practical principle is simple: make the first encounter with a demanding text tool-light, not tool-free. Read enough to form an initial view. Mark what you do not understand. Decide what you think the writer is trying to achieve. Then use tools deliberately: define a term, test a counterargument, locate a source, compare an explanation. Finally, return to the original and write in your own words. Before asking a system what a text means, give yourself the chance to decide what you think it is doing.

Exam task set

Task	Prompt	Focus
Task 1	Summarize the author’s view on when digital assistance helps or harms independent learning.	AFB I: selection, compression, paraphrase
Task 2	Analyse how the author uses structure, language and communicative strategies to develop the idea of productive friction. Support your points with precise textual evidence.	AFB II: evidence, function, effect, purpose
Task 3A	Comment on the claim that the first encounter with a difficult text should be tool-light rather than tool-free. Refer to the material and to relevant examples.	AFB II/III: evaluation and transfer
Task 3B	Write a blog entry for an upper-secondary learning platform titled “Five Minutes of Friction”, explaining how students can use digital tools without outsourcing their thinking. Refer to the material but create an independent text for your target audience.	AFB II/III: transformation, audience, genre

Full simulation: Use the official Part II frame of 225 minutes for choice, reading, planning, writing and review. Use only permitted dictionaries and no web or AI. Sprint mode: 90 minutes for a shortened training session. This is a learning mode, not an official exam timing.

Context vocabulary and word formation

Use this order whenever a word blocks comprehension: context → word family → visual clue → English explanation → dictionary → German help. Do not jump straight to translation.

Word	Word family	English explanation	German help last
nuanced	nuance, nuanced	showing subtle differences instead of a simple either-or view	differenziert
concession	concede, concession, concessive	a point you grant to the other side before refining your own argument	Zugeständnis
credible	credibility, credibly	believable because the source, reasoning and evidence can be trusted	glaubwürdig
corroborate	corroboration, corroborative	confirm a claim with independent supporting evidence	bestätigen
interpret	interpretation, interpretive	explain meaning by connecting details with context and purpose	deuten
autonomous	autonomy, autonomously	able to make informed decisions independently	selbstständig
verify	verification, verifiable	check whether a claim or source is accurate and traceable	überprüfen

Word-building check: If the task asks for an analysis, you often need abstract nouns and precise verbs: persuade → persuasion → persuasive, rely → reliable → reliability, assume → assumption → assumed. Choose the form that fits the grammar of your sentence.

Summary

A strong summary is selective, objective and aspect-focused. It does not walk through every paragraph and does not evaluate the author.

Step	Exam action
Focus	underline the exact aspect in the operator.
Select	mark only ideas that answer that aspect.
Group	combine related points across paragraphs.
Paraphrase	rebuild meaning with your own syntax and vocabulary.
Connect	show the logic between points without copying the original structure.
Check	remove examples, quotations, repetition and personal opinion unless the task requires them.

No replacement summary is provided here. Your learning evidence is your own version plus a revision note explaining what you cut and why.

Analysis

Your core move is: evidence → method → effect → function → link to purpose. Naming a device without explaining its role is description, not analysis.

Analysis lens	Questions
Structure	How does the writer move from problem to distinction, evidence, concession and conclusion? Where does the argument pivot?
Language	Which lexical fields, contrasts, metaphors, repetitions, modal verbs, register or sentence patterns shape meaning?
Communicative strategies	How are readers addressed? How are examples, statistics, references, concessions or quotations used?
Perspective	Does the writer appear balanced, selective, cautious, urgent or one-sided? How is that stance created?
Visual material	If present, how do composition, scale, symbolism, caption or heading interact with the written argument?

Evidence discipline: Prefer a short quotation or precise paragraph reference, then spend more space explaining how and why it matters. Do not collect quotations as decoration.

Speaking

The Cambridge video above is a fluency and interaction model only; its exam format is not the Baden-Württemberg Kommunikationsprüfung.

5-minute monologue practice: Explain whether productive friction is a useful principle for independent study. Use one claim, one counterpoint, one example and one conclusion.

10-minute dialogue practice: With a partner, agree on three principles for using digital tools while keeping responsibility for interpretation. Your goal is not to “win” but to develop, challenge and refine ideas together.

Writing

For Task 3, choose deliberately. A personal response rewards a clear position, counterargument, relevant examples and material reference. A creative task rewards audience awareness, target-text conventions, coherent content and language control.

Before drafting	Question
Purpose	What should my reader think, understand or do after reading?
Audience	What knowledge, tone and register fit this reader?
Material link	Which idea from the source must I transform rather than copy?
Structure	What is the clearest sequence for this target text?
Language	Which verbs, connectors and lexical fields will make my reasoning precise?

Do not memorise a full template essay. Memorise decisions: purpose, audience, line of reasoning, evidence, counterargument, conclusion, review.

Optional mediation extension

For 2027, mediation is a course competence but not a component of the final written English exam format. Use this short extension only as transfer practice.

Fictional German school notice: „Die Oberstufe testet einen freiwilligen Lernnachmittag zum selbstständigen Arbeiten. Digitale Hilfsmittel dürfen genutzt werden, wenn die Lernenden ihre Quellen dokumentieren und einen kurzen Reflexionssatz ergänzen. Persönliche Daten oder urheberrechtlich geschützte Prüfungsunterlagen dürfen nicht in externe Dienste hochgeladen werden.“

Task: Mediate the relevant information into an English email to an exchange student who wants to join the session. Do not translate word for word.

Supports and differentiation

Dimension	Support	Core LF	Challenge
Language	English definition plus word family, then dictionary, then German cue	English-first with dictionary only when needed	avoid German help and reformulate with academic collocations
Scope	analyse two central strategies	analyse structure, language and communicative strategies	integrate visual or source-critical material as well
Pace	untimed first attempt	225-minute full Part II simulation	reduce planning time while keeping review time
Evidence	paragraph references	short quotations plus paragraph references	compare several pieces of evidence and qualify claims
Help	guiding questions	self-selected checklist	no prompts until after the first draft

Help ladder: First reread the sentence. Then inspect the paragraph. Then use the word family. Then consult an English dictionary. Only then use the German cue if it is still necessary.

Feedback and error analysis

Use feedback to revise your own text, not to replace it.

Code	Check	Revision move
T	Task fulfilment	answer the exact operator and aspect.
E	Evidence	replace vague references with precise support.
A	Analysis	add the missing effect or function.
L	Language	improve grammar, register, collocation or sentence control.
C	Coherence	make the logic between sentences explicit.
S	Source	verify authorship, date, context, statistic or citation.

Error log: Keep one recurring error per category and one corrected example of your own. A useful feedback comment identifies the issue, explains why it matters and gives a next step; it does not write the paragraph for you.

Transfer, source checking and AI literacy

Treat every striking claim as something to trace. Find the original source, check date and context, compare independent coverage, inspect whether the evidence really supports the wording, and distinguish primary evidence from commentary.

AI rule: An AI answer is not a source. If a tool supplies a quotation, statistic, author or URL, verify it independently before using it. Under exam conditions, do not use AI at all. During learning, use it only if permitted, without personal data or unlicensed uploads, and never as a substitute author.

Abi check and follow-up course

Before you call a practice run “exam-ready”, check that you can do all of the following without a model solution.

Check	Ready when ...
Summary	you can select only task-relevant content and paraphrase it accurately.
Analysis	every main paragraph links evidence to effect and purpose.
Personal writing	your position is nuanced and engages with a counterargument.
Creative writing	your text clearly fits audience, purpose and target-text conventions.
Language	errors do not obscure meaning and your register is consistently appropriate.
Time	you protect planning and review time instead of writing until the last second.
Source awareness	you can distinguish evidence, interpretation and unverifiable claims.

Next course: ABI LF - Full non-fiction mock exam.

Interaktive Aufgaben

Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen

What is the main purpose of an aspect-focused summary? (To condense only the information relevant to the task) (!To evaluate every rhetorical device) (!To reproduce the paragraph order) (!To add your personal opinion)

Which move turns description into analysis? (Explaining how evidence creates an effect linked to purpose) (!Naming as many stylistic devices as possible) (!Copying a long quotation) (!Retelling the paragraph in different words)

Which area is explicitly relevant to non-fiction analysis in the 2027 Facherlass? (Line of argument) (!Character costume) (!Stage directions) (!Rhyme scheme)

What should happen before German vocabulary help in this MOOC? (Context and English-first clarification) (!Immediate full translation) (!Automatic AI rewriting) (!Skipping the difficult passage)

What is productive friction in the practice text? (Difficulty that requires a meaningful judgment) (!Any technical inconvenience) (!A blurry photocopy) (!A broken website)

Which source-checking habit is strongest? (Tracing a claim back to its original source) (!Trusting a claim because it sounds precise) (!Using the first search result only) (!Assuming a citation is real because an AI produced it)

Which task belongs to Part II.3 of the 2027 written format? (Personal response or creative writing) (!Listening comprehension only) (!Vocabulary dictation) (!Oral mediation only)

What is the role of a concession in an argument? (To acknowledge a counterpoint before refining the position) (!To end the text without a conclusion) (!To replace evidence with emotion) (!To repeat the thesis word for word)

Which feedback comment is most useful? (This paragraph needs a clearer link between evidence and purpose) (!Bad) (!Write something better) (!Use more difficult words)

What should you do with AI-generated citations? (Verify them independently before use) (!Assume they are accurate) (!Submit them without opening the source) (!Replace all original reading with them)

Memory

claim	central assertion
evidence	supporting material
register	level of formality
concession	acknowledged counterpoint
corroboration	independent confirmation
cohesion	logical linguistic connection

Drag and Drop

Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu.	Thema
summary	objective compression
analysis	explanation of effects and functions
personal response	reasoned evaluation
creative writing	audience-specific transformation
source check	verification of origin and context

...

Kreuzworträtsel

purpose	What is the writer trying to achieve?
register	What term describes the level of formality in language?
evidence	What supports a claim with textual or factual material?
audience	Who is the intended group of readers or listeners?
concession	What acknowledges a counterpoint before the argument continues?
cohesion	What makes sentences and ideas connect linguistically?

LearningApps

Lückentext

An aspect-focused summary selects only

information. A non-fiction analysis explains how textual choices shape

and purpose. The line of argument describes how the writer develops a

across the text. A concession acknowledges a

before the position is refined. Reliable source work traces a statement back to its

. During the 2027 written exam, Part I tests

. The long written Part II includes summary, analysis and a final

choice. In independent learning, AI output must be treated as an

claim until checked.

Offene Aufgaben

Leicht

Headline audit: Find three headlines from reputable English-language outlets and rewrite each as a neutral one-sentence claim without adding information.
Vocabulary ladder: Build a six-word family map from terms in the practice text and add one original sentence for each family.
One-minute summary: Explain the main argument of “The Friction We Need” orally in sixty seconds without notes, then check what you omitted.
Evidence hunt: Mark four places in the practice text where the writer supports, qualifies or limits a claim and label the function.

Standard

Argument map: Turn the practice text into a visual map with thesis, supporting reasons, concession, example and conclusion.
Rhetorical comparison: Compare the rhetorical triangle video with one paragraph of the practice text and explain which appeal is strongest.
Peer feedback: Exchange only a checklist and margin comments with a partner; do not rewrite one another’s paragraphs.
Private speaking rehearsal: Record a voluntary private two-minute response, listen once for structure and once for language, then delete it if you do not want to keep it.

Schwer

Blind transfer: Choose a new reputable non-fiction article, hide the headline after reading and reconstruct its thesis, audience, purpose and line of argument from evidence.
Source triangulation: Trace one statistic from a current English-language article to its original source and compare how two outlets frame it.
Dual writing: Answer the same issue once as a personal response and once as a blog entry, then explain how audience and purpose changed your language.
Full simulation: Complete the challenge in one sitting under the official Part II time frame, then write a one-page error analysis instead of seeking a model essay.

Lernkontrolle

Transfer of method: You receive a new paragraph with no marked devices. Explain which two features you would analyse first and justify why they matter for the writer’s purpose.
Evidence quality: Compare a personal anecdote, a verified statistic and an expert quotation. Explain when each can strengthen an argument and what limitation each may have.
Structure and effect: Redesign the order of three paragraphs in the practice text and predict how the change would affect credibility and reader guidance.
Source criticism: A chatbot gives you a precise quotation with a plausible author and date. Describe a verification process that could reveal whether it is fabricated.
Audience transfer: Transform one analytical insight into advice for a younger learner without losing the core idea.
Exam strategy: Create a time plan for Part II that includes choice, reading, planning, writing and review, and explain which phase you would protect most under pressure.

Lernnachweis

For a strong learning record, you should be able to show:

Independent summary: one aspect-focused summary written without a model answer.
Evidence-based analysis: one analysis in which every main claim is linked to precise evidence and an explained effect.
Writing choice: either a personal response or a creative target text with clear audience and purpose.
Revision log: a short record of recurring task, evidence, analysis, language, coherence and source errors.
Speaking evidence: notes for a five-minute monologue and a reflection on one dialogue practice.
Source check: one documented example of tracing a claim to its original context.
Integrity statement: a brief note explaining which tools you used, which you did not use and how you verified any external help.