Zum Inhalt springen

Aging/Approaches to aging

Aus MOOCsWiki Staging
Version vom 28. September 2026, 23:30 Uhr von Glanz (Diskussion | Beiträge) (Aging daily b1de0c2b9a8f49a2a3542c500ab4bae3 6aa3d7d0b9b5)
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
a.AGINGRESEARCH IN PROGRESS
An evolving AI research projectBackground · goals · methodsUpdated 28 Sep 2026

Approaches to aging

What may counter age-related functional decline · Updated 28 September 2026

This list grows with the evidence. Its first entries concern human function; subsequent entries are mechanistic candidates or untested hypotheses. Inclusion does not establish slowing of human aging. The order is not a personal treatment recommendation.

AG-A01 · Structured physical activity

Human function · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Less major mobility disability than with health education.
  • Population / model: Older adults at mobility risk.
  • Evidence: Randomised; functional endpoint.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Serious harms not excluded; no general aging reversal.
  • Next desk check: Check adherence, safety and separate long-term replications.
  • Sources: AG-J01 · 2014-05-27

AG-A02 · Combined programs for cognition

Human function · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Small composite-test advantages over each study’s comparator.
  • Population / model: People at elevated cognitive risk.
  • Evidence: Two randomised cohorts; related programs.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Components unresolved; dementia prevention unproven. Assess burdens.
  • Next desk check: Check contact time, practice effects, daily relevance and counterstudies.
  • Sources: AG-J02 · 2015-03-12; AG-J03 · 2025-07-28

AG-A03 · TIMP2 as a functional candidate

Preclinical · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Target: plasticity with preserved connections.
  • Population / model: Mouse.
  • Evidence: Preclinical; mechanism unresolved.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Direct neuronal action competes with microglial mediation.
  • Next desk check: Examine discrepancies and availability of comparative data.
  • Sources: AG-R01 · 2026-08-12; AG-R05 · 2017-04-19; AG-R08 · 2023-06-15

AG-A04 · Targeted FTL1 regulation

Preclinical · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Target: reliable neuronal function.
  • Population / model: Mouse.
  • Evidence: Mechanistic candidate.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Avoid blanket iron suppression; transferability unresolved.
  • Next desk check: Check cellular specificity, exposure and separate functional replication.
  • Sources: AG-S09 · 2025-08-19

AG-A05 · Redox-dependent protein control

Preclinical · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Target: function after selective DUB modulation.
  • Population / model: Vertebrate models.
  • Evidence: Mechanistic candidate.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Enzyme activity does not establish cognition; broad interventions ambiguous.
  • Next desk check: Seek selective mediation and functional counterevidence.
  • Sources: AG-S08 · 2026-04-21

AG-A06 · Mitochondrial quality control

Preclinical · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Target: actual restoration beyond favourable markers.
  • Population / model: Mouse.
  • Evidence: Limited; functional findings differ.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Do not equate prevention with reversal.
  • Next desk check: Prioritise age- and strain-matched comparisons.
  • Sources: AG-R03 · 2026-03-05

AG-A07 · Spatial control of regeneration

Preclinical · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Target: correct reconnection following repair.
  • Population / model: Axolotl; injury.
  • Evidence: Comparative regeneration biology.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Tissue regrowth does not establish human aging benefit.
  • Next desk check: Check conserved mechanisms and transfer limits.
  • Sources: AG-S03 · 2025-05-21

AG-A08 · Understand senescence over time

Preclinical · Project level 1

  • Outcome / target: Target: repair without chronic functional harm.
  • Population / model: Axolotl; regeneration.
  • Evidence: Context-dependent mechanistic candidate.
  • Limits / counterevidence: No basis for indiscriminate cell removal.
  • Next desk check: Compare timing, cell type and state resolution.
  • Sources: AG-S01 · 2023-10-24

AG-A09 · AG-T01: selective cargo degradation

Hypothesis · Project level 2

  • Outcome / target: Hypothesis: jointly improve degradation, synapse preservation and function.
  • Population / model: Proposed aged neuronal system.
  • Evidence: Untested project synthesis.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Partial mediation and cargo selectivity unconfirmed.
  • Next desk check: Develop preregistrable balance measurements and alternative models.
  • Sources: AG-R01 · 2026-08-12; AG-R02 · 2026-01-21; AG-R08 · 2023-06-15

AG-A10 · AG-H02: FTL1–redox–DUB

Hypothesis · Project level 2

  • Outcome / target: Hypothesis: a causal mediation chain.
  • Population / model: No joint test.
  • Evidence: Low priority; untested.
  • Limits / counterevidence: Separate findings do not establish the chain.
  • Next desk check: First check direct prior evidence and counterevidence.
  • Sources: AG-S08 · 2026-04-21; AG-S09 · 2025-08-19

Updating: New approaches require a verifiable source or explicit hypothesis basis, a functional target endpoint, model limits and the next decisive countercheck. Failed or narrowed approaches remain visible with reasons. Category, evidence and project level are updated separately.

Continue exploring

How studies generate new questions
Schematic illustration of a DNA double helix.
16 foundation assignments + 4 new deep dives