Glanz: aiMOOC über GPT aiMOOC Action erstellt

2026-08-28T06:53:13Z

aiMOOC über GPT aiMOOC Action erstellt

Neue Seite

{{T}}
[[Category:English]]
[[Category:Research Writing and Citation]]
{{BR}}
= Introduction =

'''Research Writing and Citation''' is a course for learners in Grades 11–13 who are preparing for research essays, extended projects, presentations, reports, and early university-level writing. You will learn how to move from a broad topic to a focused [[English:Research question|Research question]], find and evaluate evidence, integrate sources into your own reasoning, document sources accurately, and revise for clarity and integrity.

Research writing is not simply collecting facts. It is a process of inquiry in which you ask a meaningful question, investigate what other people have discovered or argued, judge the quality of their evidence, develop your own position, and show readers exactly where your information comes from. Strong research writing combines '''curiosity, evidence, reasoning, structure, and transparent citation'''.

[[File:Academic writing.jpg|500px|frameless|center]]

By the end of the course, you should be able to plan a research project, search strategically, distinguish stronger from weaker sources, synthesize information across sources, use quotation, paraphrase, and summary ethically, apply a required citation style consistently, and explain how your evidence supports your conclusions.

{{BR}}
= Research Writing as an Iterative Process =

A good research project rarely moves in a perfectly straight line. You may begin with one question, discover better keywords, find evidence that changes your thinking, narrow the scope, return to the library or database, and revise your thesis. Treating research as an iterative cycle helps you respond intelligently to what you discover instead of forcing evidence to fit an early assumption.

[[File:Research cycle.svg|500px|frameless|center]]

A practical research cycle for school and introductory university work is: define the task, explore the topic, formulate a question, search for sources, evaluate evidence, take traceable notes, develop a provisional answer, draft, cite, revise, and check the final work. At any stage, new evidence may send you back to an earlier step.

{{BR}}
== From Topic to Research Question ==

A broad topic such as ''social media'', ''renewable energy'', or ''migration'' is not yet a research question. A useful question is focused enough to investigate, open enough to require analysis, and connected to evidence you can realistically obtain. Questions beginning with ''how'', ''why'', ''to what extent'', or ''under what conditions'' often invite more analysis than questions that can be answered with a single fact.

For example, instead of asking ''Is social media good or bad?'', you could investigate how a specific platform feature influences one measurable behavior in a defined age group and context. The improved question identifies variables, population, and scope. You can then refine it as you learn what evidence actually exists.

A strong [[English:Thesis statement|Thesis statement]] is your current answer to the research question, not merely the topic. It should make a claim that can be supported, qualified, challenged, or revised. In many projects your thesis develops after substantial reading, because responsible research lets evidence influence the argument.

{{BR}}
== Keywords and Search Strategy ==

Turn your question into a set of core concepts. For each concept, list synonyms, broader terms, narrower terms, and discipline-specific vocabulary. Combine terms with Boolean operators when a database supports them: '''AND''' narrows by requiring both concepts, '''OR''' broadens by accepting alternatives, and quotation marks can search for an exact phrase.

Do not depend on one search query or one platform. Compare library catalogues, academic databases, trusted institutional websites, reference works, and scholarly search tools. Keep a short search log showing which terms you tried, what databases you used, and which searches produced useful results. This makes your research reproducible and helps you avoid repeating unproductive searches.

{{BR}}
= Finding and Evaluating Sources =

Source quality depends on the question you are asking. A government dataset may be excellent for official statistics, a peer-reviewed article may be useful for recent research findings, a historical letter may be essential as a primary source, and a newspaper report may help you examine contemporary public debate. The goal is not to label every source simply ''good'' or ''bad'', but to decide whether it is suitable evidence for a particular claim.

[[File:Librarian and Student Discussing Wikipedia.jpg|500px|frameless|center]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gleI_cFL73o|500|center}}

{{BR}}
== Primary, Secondary, and Tertiary Sources ==

A [[English:Primary source|Primary source]] provides direct evidence from the time, event, person, experiment, or dataset being studied. Examples can include interviews, diaries, legislation, photographs, raw data, speeches, laboratory results, or original research articles, depending on the discipline.

A [[English:Secondary source|Secondary source]] analyzes, interprets, compares, or critiques primary material or earlier research. Scholarly books and review essays are common examples. A [[English:Tertiary source|Tertiary source]] summarizes established information from many sources, as dictionaries, encyclopedias, and some textbooks do. The same item can play different roles in different research questions, so classify a source by how it functions in your project.

{{BR}}
== Credibility, Relevance, and Lateral Reading ==

Evaluate sources by asking who created them, what evidence they provide, how transparent their methods are, when the information was produced or updated, why it was published, and whether independent trustworthy sources support the important claims. Relevance also matters: a highly credible source can still be unsuitable if it does not address your actual question.

For web sources, do not remain on one page and accept its self-description. Use '''lateral reading''': open new tabs, investigate the author or organization, trace claims to their original context, and compare what independent sources say. This is especially important when a page has persuasive design but unclear expertise, sponsorship, evidence, or editorial standards.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoQG6Tin-1E|500|center}}

A useful source evaluation record can include the source's purpose, author expertise, evidence quality, publication process, currency, limitations, possible conflicts of interest, and relevance to your question. Record your judgment in your own words instead of relying only on a checklist score.

{{BR}}
= Reading Scholarly Sources =

Scholarly articles often have a recognizable structure, but the details differ across disciplines. Empirical research commonly includes an abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, and references. Humanities articles may organize evidence and interpretation differently. Read strategically: identify the research problem, central claim, evidence, method, assumptions, limitations, and relationship to earlier scholarship.

Peer review means that knowledgeable reviewers evaluate a manuscript before publication in many scholarly journals. It is an important quality-control process, but it does not guarantee that every claim is correct. You still need to examine methods, evidence, limitations, and later responses or replications.

[[File:Models of peer-review - Open Science Training Handbook 09.png|500px|frameless|center]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gG5LMy3KVLM|500|center}}

{{BR}}
== Literature Reviews and Synthesis ==

A [[English:Literature review|Literature review]] is not a sequence of mini-summaries. It organizes existing research around patterns, debates, methods, themes, gaps, or changes over time. Synthesis means putting sources into conversation with one another and with your own research question.

As you read, create a synthesis matrix. Put sources in rows and themes or subquestions in columns. Record what each source contributes, where sources agree or disagree, what methods they use, and what limitations matter. The matrix helps you build paragraphs around ideas rather than around one source at a time.

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2d7y_r65HU|500|center}}

{{BR}}
= Writing with Evidence =

Your paper needs a clear relationship between '''claim, evidence, and reasoning'''. A claim states what you want the reader to accept. Evidence gives relevant support. Reasoning explains why that evidence supports the claim, how strong the support is, and what limitations or alternative interpretations remain.

A paragraph that contains a quotation but no explanation is not automatically well supported. Introduce evidence, present it accurately, cite it, and then analyze its significance. Your own reasoning should guide the paragraph.

[[File:Research Integrity.jpg|500px|frameless|center]]

{{BR}}
== Quotation, Paraphrase, and Summary ==

A '''quotation''' reproduces a source's exact wording and must be clearly marked as quoted material according to the citation style you are using. Quote when the precise wording is important, distinctive, contested, or itself the object of analysis.

A '''paraphrase''' restates a specific passage or idea fully in your own wording and sentence structure while preserving the original meaning. Changing a few words or rearranging phrases is not a sufficient paraphrase. Because the idea still comes from another source, a paraphrase normally requires citation.

A '''summary''' condenses the main point of a larger section or whole source. It also requires citation when you are presenting another author's ideas or findings. Summaries are useful when the overall argument matters more than exact wording or detail.

Before you write from a source, close or minimize it and explain the idea from your understanding. Then reopen the source to check accuracy, add the citation, and make sure your wording is genuinely independent unless you intended to quote.

{{BR}}
== Signal Phrases and Source Relationships ==

Signal phrases help readers understand who is speaking and how you are using a source. Verbs such as ''argues'', ''reports'', ''observes'', ''finds'', ''questions'', ''concludes'', and ''suggests'' carry different meanings, so choose them accurately.

Do more than stack citations. Compare sources explicitly: one study may extend another, use a different method, reach a conflicting conclusion, or study a different population. Writing these relationships makes your research paper analytical rather than merely informational.

{{BR}}
= Citation: Purpose and Systems =

Citation has two central functions: it gives credit to the people whose work you use and gives readers a trail they can follow to verify or explore your evidence. Citation also reveals the intellectual network behind your argument. A citation does '''not''' prove that a source is high quality; source evaluation and citation are separate responsibilities.

[[File:Wikipedia Citation Guide Screenshot 2018.png|500px|frameless|center]]

{{#ev:youtube|https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IMhMuVvXCVw|500|center}}

Most academic citation systems connect a short marker in the text or a note with fuller publication details in a works-cited list, reference list, or bibliography. The exact rules differ, so follow the style required by your teacher, institution, discipline, journal, or assignment.

{{BR}}
== MLA, APA, and Chicago in Overview ==

'''MLA style''' is common in language and literary studies. Its in-text citations usually direct readers to an entry in a Works Cited list and often emphasize the author and location, such as a page number when relevant.

'''APA style''' is common in social and behavioral sciences. Its author-date system emphasizes who produced the work and when, and cited sources appear in a References list.

'''Chicago style''' offers two main systems. Notes and bibliography uses numbered footnotes or endnotes and is common in many humanities fields. Author-date uses brief parenthetical citations and a reference list and is common in some sciences and social sciences.

Do not mix styles randomly. Consistency matters, and details such as capitalization, punctuation, italics, author order, dates, page ranges, DOIs, and URLs can differ. When uncertain, consult the current official style guidance or the exact instructions for your assignment.

{{BR}}
== Building a Reliable Citation Record ==

As soon as you decide that a source may be useful, capture enough information to find it again: author or organization, title, container such as journal or website, publication date, volume and issue when relevant, page range, publisher, DOI or stable URL, and the date you accessed material when the style requires it.

Separate your own notes from copied wording. Use quotation marks in your research notes whenever you copy exact language, and record page numbers or other locations immediately. This prevents ''source amnesia'', in which you later remember an idea but cannot reconstruct where it came from.

Citation generators and reference managers can save time, but they can import incomplete or incorrect metadata. Treat generated citations as drafts: compare them with the source and with authoritative style guidance before submitting your work.

{{BR}}
= Academic Integrity, Plagiarism, and Responsible AI Use =

[[English:Plagiarism|Plagiarism]] occurs when you present another person's words, ideas, data, structure, media, or other intellectual contribution as if it were your own without appropriate acknowledgement. Plagiarism can involve direct copying, inadequate paraphrasing, missing citations, misleading source use, or submitting work produced by someone else when the task requires your own work.

Academic integrity is broader than avoiding punishment. It means being transparent about how knowledge was produced, respecting other people's contributions, representing evidence accurately, and allowing readers or teachers to understand what you did yourself.

Policies for generative AI differ among schools, courses, publishers, and disciplines. Before using an AI system, check the assignment and institutional rules. If use is permitted, keep a record of what you used it for, verify factual claims and references independently, protect confidential information, and acknowledge or cite the use when your policy or citation style requires it. Never treat an AI-generated reference as real until you verify the original source.

The same principle applies to translation tools, collaborative documents, image generators, coding assistants, and other digital tools: disclose assistance when the rules require disclosure, and remain responsible for the final work.

{{BR}}
= Revision and Final Research Check =

Revision is more than correcting grammar. First revise globally: Does the thesis answer the research question? Does each section advance the argument? Is the evidence sufficient and relevant? Have you addressed important counterevidence or limitations? Are paragraphs organized by ideas rather than by source?

Then revise locally: improve transitions, sentence clarity, terminology, quotation integration, and citation placement. Finally, compare every in-text citation or note with the final source list and every source-list entry with the paper. Remove unused entries if the required style expects only cited works.

A strong final check asks: Can a reader distinguish my ideas from source material? Can the reader locate every important borrowed claim? Have I represented sources fairly? Is the citation style consistent? Have I met the assignment's ethical and technical requirements?

{{BR}}
= Interactive Tasks =

{{BR}}
== Quiz: Test Your Knowledge ==

{{MC}}

'''What is the main purpose of a research question?'''
(To focus an investigation that requires evidence and analysis)
(!To list every fact already known about a topic)
(!To guarantee that the first thesis is correct)
(!To replace the need for source evaluation)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''Which practice best demonstrates lateral reading?'''
(Checking independent sources about an author or organization)
(!Reading only the About page of the original website)
(!Judging credibility only from visual design)
(!Choosing the first result returned by a search engine)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What is a paraphrase?'''
(A restatement of a source idea in genuinely new wording and structure)
(!A quotation with the quotation marks removed)
(!A list of synonyms placed into the original sentence)
(!A summary that never needs a citation)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What is synthesis in research writing?'''
(Connecting multiple sources around patterns debates or themes)
(!Writing one isolated summary for each source)
(!Using only sources that agree with each other)
(!Replacing analysis with a long bibliography)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What does peer review normally do?'''
(It adds expert evaluation before publication in many scholarly journals)
(!It guarantees that every published claim is permanently correct)
(!It removes the need to inspect methods and evidence)
(!It proves that nonacademic sources can never be useful)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''Why should you record source details while researching?'''
(To keep evidence traceable and make accurate citation easier)
(!To avoid reading the source again)
(!To make every source equally credible)
(!To eliminate the need for revision)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''Which statement about citation is most accurate?'''
(It gives credit and helps readers trace the evidence)
(!It automatically proves that a source is reliable)
(!It is required only for direct quotations)
(!It allows a writer to ignore the meaning of a source)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''Which citation system is associated with both notes and bibliography and author date options?'''
(Chicago)
(!MLA)
(!APA)
(!Harvard)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What should you do with a citation created by an automatic generator?'''
(Check its metadata and format against authoritative guidance)
(!Submit it without checking any details)
(!Delete the author if the source has a DOI)
(!Change it into several citation styles in one paper)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What is the most responsible first step before using generative AI for an assignment?'''
(Check the assignment and institutional rules)
(!Assume that all AI use is always allowed)
(!Copy generated references without verification)
(!Hide the use of tools from the teacher)

{{E}}
<br>

{{BR}}
== Memory Game ==

<div class="memo-quiz">
{|
|-
| Research question || A focused inquiry that guides what evidence you need
|-
| Thesis || A defensible answer or central claim developed from the inquiry
|-
| Primary source || Direct evidence from the event period dataset or phenomenon studied
|-
| Paraphrase || A source idea restated accurately in genuinely new wording and structure
|-
| Synthesis || A connection among several sources around a shared issue or pattern
|-
| Citation || A reference that credits a source and helps readers locate it
|-
| Credibility || The degree to which a source is trustworthy for a particular purpose
|-
| Bibliography || A structured list of source information at the end of a work
|}
{{E}}
<br>

{{BR}}
== Drag and Drop ==

<div class="lueckentext-quiz">

{| class="wikitable"
! Match the correct terms.
! Topic
|-
| '''Search strategy'''
| Combining keywords and databases to locate relevant evidence
|-
| '''Lateral reading'''
| Leaving a page to investigate its author claims and reputation elsewhere
|-
| '''Signal phrase'''
| Wording that identifies a source and frames how it contributes
|-
| '''Source log'''
| A record that keeps searches notes and publication details traceable
|-
| '''Revision'''
| Reworking argument evidence organization wording and documentation
|}
{{E}}

<br>
...
<br />

{{BR}}
== Crossword Puzzle ==

<div class="kreuzwort-quiz">
{|
|-
| Thesis || What word names the central claim that answers a research question
|-
| Paraphrase || What word means restating a source idea in new wording and structure
|-
| Citation || What word names a reference that credits and identifies a source
|-
| Bibliography || What word names a structured list of sources at the end of a work
|-
| Credibility || What word describes trustworthiness for a particular research purpose
|-
| Plagiarism || What word describes presenting another person's work as your own without proper acknowledgement
|}
{{E}}
<br>

{{BR}}
== LearningApps ==

<iframe> https://learningapps.org/index.php?s=Research+Writing+and+Citation </iframe>

{{BR}}
== Cloze Text ==

<quiz display=simple>
{'''Complete the text.'''<br>
|type="{}"}
A focused { research question } gives your investigation a clear direction. A provisional { thesis } states the answer you currently expect the evidence to support. Strong researchers evaluate a source's { credibility } as well as its relevance. Reading beyond the original webpage to investigate it elsewhere is called { lateral reading }. A source idea rewritten in genuinely new language is a { paraphrase }. When several sources are connected around a shared issue you are creating a { synthesis }. A short marker in the text or a note is linked to fuller information through a { citation }. Presenting another person's work as your own without proper acknowledgement is { plagiarism }. A list of complete source entries can be called a { bibliography }. Before submitting you should conduct a final { revision } of argument evidence and documentation.
</quiz>

<br>

{{BR}}
= Open-Ended Tasks =

{{BR}}
=== Easy ===
# [[English:Research question|Research question]]: Turn one broad school subject into three focused research questions, then explain which question is most researchable and why.
# [[English:Source evaluation|Source evaluation]]: Choose two web sources about the same claim and create a one-page credibility comparison using author, evidence, currency, purpose, and independent corroboration.
# [[English:Paraphrase|Paraphrase]]: Select a short paragraph from a reliable source, write one accurate paraphrase and one summary, and annotate the choices that make your wording independent.
# [[English:Citation|Citation]]: Build a citation card for one book, one article, and one webpage by recording all metadata needed to cite each source later.

{{BR}}
=== Standard ===
# [[English:Annotated bibliography|Annotated bibliography]]: Create an annotated bibliography of five sources for a research question, with each annotation explaining relevance, credibility, contribution, and limitations.
# [[English:Lateral reading|Lateral reading]]: Record a screen-capture video that demonstrates how you investigate the credibility of one online source by opening and comparing independent sources.
# [[English:Library research|Library research]]: Interview a school or university librarian about search strategy, databases, and common citation mistakes, then turn the interview into a practical research checklist.
# [[English:Synthesis|Synthesis]]: Build a synthesis matrix from four sources and use it to write one paragraph that shows agreement, disagreement, and a justified conclusion.

{{BR}}
=== Advanced ===
# [[English:Research proposal|Research proposal]]: Produce a formal proposal containing a research question, rationale, preliminary thesis, search plan, source criteria, ethical considerations, and expected limitations.
# [[English:Mini literature review|Mini literature review]]: Write a structured review that synthesizes at least six credible sources around themes or debates rather than summarizing them one by one.
# [[English:Peer review|Peer review]]: Design a peer-review protocol for research drafts, test it with classmates, collect feedback on the protocol, and revise it based on what reviewers found useful.
# [[English:Research communication|Research communication]]: Create a five-minute video or podcast that presents a research claim, traces the evidence behind it, explains one limitation, and provides a complete source list.

{{:Open Task - Create a MOOC}}

{{BR}}
= Learning Assessment =

# [[English:Evidence chain|Evidence chain]]: Choose one major claim from your research paper and map the chain from research question to evidence to reasoning to conclusion, then explain where the chain is strongest and weakest.
# [[English:Source triangulation|Source triangulation]]: Investigate one contested claim with three independent sources of different types and justify how the combination changes your confidence in the claim.
# [[English:Citation audit|Citation audit]]: Exchange drafts with a peer and test whether every quotation, paraphrase, statistic, image, and borrowed idea can be traced to a complete source entry.
# [[English:Argument revision|Argument revision]]: Revise a paragraph after receiving new evidence that partly contradicts your thesis, showing how responsible research can qualify rather than simply defend a claim.
# [[English:Method transfer|Method transfer]]: Apply the same source-evaluation method to a scholarly article, a news report, and a social-media post, then explain which criteria remain useful and which need to change.
# [[English:Integrity case study|Integrity case study]]: Analyze a scenario involving collaboration, paraphrasing, citation software, and generative AI, then propose a transparent workflow that would meet a clearly stated academic-integrity policy.

<br>
<br>

{{BR}}
= Evidence of Learning =

'''Knowledge:''' You can explain the purpose of research questions, theses, source types, peer review, synthesis, citation systems, and academic integrity.<br>
'''Research skills:''' You can search with purposeful keywords, evaluate sources laterally, trace claims to original evidence, and keep a reliable source record.<br>
'''Writing skills:''' You can integrate quotation, paraphrase, and summary into analytical paragraphs while maintaining your own line of reasoning.<br>
'''Documentation skills:''' You can apply one required citation style consistently, match in-text citations or notes with full entries, and check generated citations against authoritative guidance.<br>
'''Products:''' Your portfolio can include a research question, search log, source-evaluation record, synthesis matrix, annotated bibliography, research draft, peer feedback, revision, and final cited paper.<br>
'''Transfer:''' You can use the same principles to judge evidence and acknowledge sources in school subjects, vocational reports, university assignments, presentations, digital media, and workplace research.<br>
'''Reflection:''' You can explain how new evidence changed your thinking and identify the ethical decisions you made during the research process.

<br>
<br>

{{BR}}
= OERs on the Topic =

<iframe> https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Academic_writing </iframe>

<br>

The following freely accessible resources can support further practice:
# [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Citing_your_sources.pdf Citing your sources]: A Creative Commons guide on identifying and citing sources.
# [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Avoiding_plagiarism.pdf Avoiding plagiarism]: A Creative Commons guide with examples of appropriate and inappropriate paraphrasing.
# [https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/videos/citation-very-brief-introduction Citation: A Very Brief Introduction]: An openly licensed NC State University Libraries video explaining why citation matters.
# [https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/videos/peer-review-three-minutes Peer Review in Three Minutes]: An openly licensed NC State University Libraries video introducing scholarly peer review.

For current style details, consult authoritative guidance such as the [https://style.mla.org/ MLA Style Center], [https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/citations APA Style citation guidance], [https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide Chicago-Style Citation Quick Guide], or your teacher's required manual.

{{BR}}
= Linked Learning Areas =

{| align=center
{{:D-Tab}}
'''[[English:Research Writing and Citation|Research Writing and Citation]]'''
# [[English:Research question|Research question]]
# [[English:Thesis statement|Thesis statement]]
# [[English:Information literacy|Information literacy]]
# [[English:Source evaluation|Source evaluation]]
# [[English:Primary source|Primary source]]
# [[English:Literature review|Literature review]]
# [[English:Academic writing|Academic writing]]
# [[English:Citation|Citation]]
# [[English:Plagiarism|Plagiarism]]
# [[English:Peer review|Peer review]]
|}

Research writing connects English language arts with [[English:Information literacy|Information literacy]], [[English:Media literacy|Media literacy]], [[English:History|History]], [[English:Social science|Social science]], [[English:Science|Science]], [[English:Digital literacy|Digital literacy]], and professional communication. The same habits—asking focused questions, testing evidence, documenting sources, and revising claims—support learning across school, vocational education, university, and workplace contexts.

{{BR}}
= aiMOOC Projects =
[[Category:English]]
[[Category:Research Writing and Citation]]
[[Category:Academic writing]]
[[Category:Citation]]
[[Category:Information literacy]]
[[Category:Media literacy]]
[[Category:Grades 11-13]]
[[Category:AI_MOOC]]
[[Category:GPT aiMOOC]]
{{MT}}

English:Research Writing and Citation - Versionsgeschichte

Glanz: aiMOOC über GPT aiMOOC Action erstellt