Glanz: aiMOOC über GPT aiMOOC Action erstellt

2026-10-02T13:52:39Z

aiMOOC über GPT aiMOOC Action erstellt

Neue Seite

{{T}}
{{BR}}
= ABI LF - Komplexe Texte effizient annotieren =

'''Mini-description:''' Build a reduced annotation technique for '''argument, perspective, motif, language, evidence''' and '''context'''. Mark less, connect more. Zielgruppe: [[Englisch]] als fortgeführte Fremdsprache, [[Kursstufe]] Baden-Württemberg, '''Leistungsfach'''.

[[Datei:Complex argument2.svg|500px|rahmenlos|center]]

'''Media entry:''' Look at the argument diagram for 20 seconds. What would you actually need to mark in a source text to reconstruct the logic — and what could stay unmarked?

{{#ev:youtube| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J2KHX1Pm5co |500|center}}

'''Viewing prompt:''' Watch for one idea about [[Close Reading]] that supports selective rather than decorative highlighting.

{{BR}}
= Einleitung =

This aiMOOC trains a lean, exam-oriented way of reading complex texts. You will annotate only what can become part of a summary, analysis, discussion, spoken response or source-based link. The central routine is '''APMLEC 6×2''': six lenses, normally no more than two purposeful marks per paragraph.

'''English first:''' Try context, word formation, a sketch or diagram, an English explanation and a monolingual dictionary before brief German help. A full German translation is not the learning goal.

'''Copyright and privacy:''' The course uses short original practice texts, freely licensed Commons media and platform-hosted educational videos. It does not reproduce complete compulsory texts or upload protected film sequences. Fictitious data are labelled as such. Recordings are optional and should remain private/local unless you explicitly choose otherwise.

{{BR}}
== I-can goals ==

# [[Leseverstehen|Selective reading]]: I can identify the few passages that matter for the task.
# [[Argumentation|Argument]]: I can reconstruct claims, reasons, counterclaims and qualifications.
# [[Erzählperspektive|Perspective]]: I can distinguish viewpoint, stance, voice and positioning.
# [[Motiv|Motif]]: I can trace a recurring image, idea or frame when it is meaning-bearing.
# [[Stilmittel|Language]]: I can link diction, tone, syntax or technique to a function.
# [[Beleg|Evidence and context]]: I can choose concise evidence and connect it to relevant context without a context dump.
# [[Textanalyse|Analysis]]: I can turn annotations into a differentiated, evidence-based paragraph.
# [[Abitur Englisch|Exam transfer]]: I can adapt my notes to the written examination and to the communication examination.

{{BR}}
== Vorwissen: 90-second diagnostic ==

Take any short English paragraph from your current course material. Give yourself 90 seconds.

# Circle the main claim or central idea.
# Add only two margin codes from A, P, M, L, E, C.
# Cross out one mark that would not help you answer an operator-based task.
# Finish the sentence: '''I marked this because it helps me to ...'''

If almost every line is coloured, this MOOC is for you.

[[Datei:Critical Thinking Skills Diagram.svg|500px|rahmenlos|center]]

{{BR}}
= The APMLEC 6×2 method =

{| class="wikitable"
! Code
! Lens
! Ask
! Typical note
|-
| '''A'''
| '''Argument'''
| What is claimed, supported, qualified or challenged?
| claim → reason → consequence
|-
| '''P'''
| '''Perspective'''
| Who sees, speaks or frames the issue? Which stance is foregrounded?
| insider view / skeptical stance / limited narrator
|-
| '''M'''
| '''Motif'''
| Which image, idea, contrast or frame recurs meaningfully?
| threshold / silence / journey
|-
| '''L'''
| '''Language'''
| Which linguistic or formal choice shapes meaning or effect?
| loaded diction / contrast / short syntax / free indirect style
|-
| '''E'''
| '''Evidence'''
| What precise textual detail, example, quotation or data point can support an interpretation?
| key phrase + line reference
|-
| '''C'''
| '''Context'''
| Which situational, cultural, historical or media context is relevant to this task?
| audience / publication situation / cultural frame
|}

'''Important:''' You do not need all six codes in every paragraph. A code is useful only when you can explain its function.

[[Datei:Argument Map.png|500px|rahmenlos|center]]

{{BR}}
== Anti-overmarking: Gist → Select → Link ==

# '''Gist''': Read the paragraph once without highlighting. Write a 3–6 word margin gist.
# '''Select''': Add normally no more than two purposeful marks. Prefer margin codes to six different colours.
# '''Link''': Connect each kept mark to the operator: summarize, analyze, assess, compare, discuss, comment or mediate.

Use the '''deletion test''': If removing a highlight would not weaken your planned answer, remove it.

Use the '''function test''': Never write only “metaphor”, “statistic” or “tone”. Add what it does: '''L → creates distance''', '''E → qualifies claim''', '''P → narrows viewpoint'''.

{{BR}}
== Reading lab: one short original text ==

'''Fictitious practice text; all names and data are invented.'''

(1) At Northbridge Sixth Form, students were invited — not required — to try one phone-free reading block each week. (2) After eight weeks, the library reported 18 percent more loans than in the previous eight-week period. (3) The figure sounds persuasive, but it does not prove that the phone rule caused the rise: a new exam-preparation shelf opened at the same time. (4) Supporters describe the block as “quiet space that belongs to everyone”; critics call it “a symbolic fix for a deeper problem.” (5) The disagreement is not only about phones. (6) It is about who controls attention in a shared learning environment. (7) For some students, the sealed phone pouch becomes a small symbol of relief; for others, it represents mistrust. (8) Any fair evaluation should therefore combine usage data with student perspectives and check other possible explanations.

'''Your task:''' First write the gist. Then keep a maximum of eight annotations for the whole text. Finally choose the best three for an analytical response to: '''Analyze how the writer presents the debate as more complex than a simple pro-or-con issue.'''

A possible annotation harvest is not a model essay:
# '''A''': the writer qualifies the apparent causal claim.
# '''P''': supporters and critics frame the same measure differently.
# '''M''': the phone pouch becomes a small symbol of relief versus mistrust.
# '''L''': contrastive phrasing complicates a binary reading.
# '''E''': the 18 percent figure is useful only together with the competing explanation.
# '''C''': the school-policy setting matters because shared attention and institutional control are at stake.

{{BR}}
== Listening and Viewing ==

{{#ev:youtube| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MSYw502dJNY |500|center}}

'''Pass 1 — gist only:''' Write one sentence answering: Why does critical reading require an active reader?

'''Pass 2 — selective notes:''' Use only A, P, L and E. Stop after six notes. Compare: Which note would most improve a written analysis, and why?

{{#ev:youtube| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KKsLuRPsvU |500|center}}

'''Transfer prompt:''' The video explains claim–evidence–reasoning in a science context. Translate the principle into English text analysis: a claim about a text needs evidence plus an explanation of function. Do not copy a science template mechanically.

{{BR}}
== Context vocabulary: learn through English ==

[[Datei:Icon dictionary.svg|300px|rahmenlos|center]]

{| class="wikitable"
! Word
! Word formation / family
! English explanation
! Use in analysis
|-
| claim
| claim → counterclaim
| a position that can be supported or challenged
| The writer qualifies the claim by...
|-
| stance
| stance → take a stance
| an expressed or implied position
| The speaker adopts a cautious stance.
|-
| imply
| imply → implication → implicit
| communicate without stating directly
| The contrast implies that...
|-
| recur
| recur → recurring → recurrence
| appear repeatedly
| The recurring image functions as...
|-
| evidence
| evident → evidence → evidential
| material used to support a point
| This detail provides evidence for...
|-
| qualify
| qualify → qualification
| limit or make a statement more precise
| The modal verb qualifies the certainty.
|-
| bias
| bias → biased
| systematic favouring of one perspective
| The selection may reveal a bias toward...
|-
| causation
| cause → causal → causation
| a relationship in which one factor produces another
| The statistic shows correlation, not necessarily causation.
|}

'''Help ladder:''' 1 context clue → 2 word family → 3 sketch/visualization → 4 English paraphrase → 5 monolingual dictionary → 6 bilingual dictionary or brief German help.

{{BR}}
== Analysis: from mark to meaning ==

Use a short chain: '''Point → Evidence → Function → Link'''.

'''Micro-scaffold:''' “The writer frames X as Y. The phrase ... provides evidence because ... . This linguistic or structural choice ... . It positions the reader/speaker ... and therefore strengthens/qualifies/challenges ... .”

Avoid device hunting. Naming a stylistic device without explaining its function is not analysis.

For literary texts, prioritize language, narrative perspective, characterization, structure, time, setting and meaningful motifs when the task calls for them. For non-literary texts, prioritize line of argument, language and communicative strategies such as forms of address, examples, statistics, references, quotations and perspective.

[[Datei:Argument terminology used in logic (en).svg|500px|rahmenlos|center]]

{{BR}}
== Speaking: communication mode ==

[[Datei:Speech bubbles.svg|500px|rahmenlos|center]]

For oral preparation, dense annotation slows you down. Reduce APMLEC to a speaking card:

# '''Position''': one sentence.
# '''Two supports''': two E-notes linked to A or P.
# '''One complication''': a counterpoint, limitation or context link.
# '''Bridge''': one question or phrase that opens dialogue.

Practice a 60-second monologue, then a 90-second discussion. Record only if you want to; keep recordings private/local unless everyone involved explicitly agrees to another use.

{{BR}}
== Writing: build, do not outsource ==

Start from your annotation harvest, not from an AI-generated essay.

# Choose one analytical claim.
# Add the shortest sufficient textual evidence.
# Explain how the evidence works.
# Link the insight to the operator and, where relevant, context.
# Revise for precision, cohesion and register.

'''LF stretch:''' Combine two materials or two text moments without listing them separately. Make the relationship explicit: contrast, continuity, tension, cause, limitation or reframing.

{{BR}}
== Mediation: selective transfer ==

In mediation, do not annotate every unknown word. Mark '''purpose, audience, relevant content and culture-specific risk'''. A/P/E/C are usually enough. Render meaning for the target situation rather than translating line by line.

In the qualification phase, the official regulations for the current 2027/2028 cohorts include an isolated assessment of mediation competence, normally with an English text production of about 60 minutes in a course assessment. Check the rules for your own cohort before planning.

{{BR}}
= Abi-Check Baden-Württemberg =

'''Status checked: 02 October 2026.''' For the 2027 and 2028 English Leistungsfach cohorts, the official documents currently refer to [[Bildungsplan 2016]] and set the focus '''On the Move: Migration and Cross-Cultural Encounters''' plus the USA and UK fields on politics, culture and society. This MOOC does not reproduce the compulsory texts or film.

'''Written part, current 2027/2028 format:''' about 255 minutes including selection time; listening about 30 minutes; 15-minute break; writing 225 minutes. Writing includes an aspect-based summary, analysis, and a personal statement or creative-writing task. In analysis, evidence and linguistic/formal features must be connected to communicative intent or presented content.

'''Weighting, current 2027/2028 rules:''' Listening 20 percent, Writing 55 percent, Communication examination 25 percent of the overall score of the written Abitur examination. In Writing, content and language are weighted 40:60.

'''Communication examination:''' individual or tandem format; 15 minutes preparation. The individual examination lasts at least 15 minutes, the tandem at least 20 minutes; the monologic section is about 5 minutes per candidate and the dialogic section about 10 minutes. Monolingual and bilingual dictionaries are permitted during preparation.

'''Leistungsfach emphasis:''' broader and deeper content, greater text complexity, differentiated evidence-based analysis, independent linking of materials and stronger emphasis on AFB II/III than AFB I.

'''Always re-check your cohort:''' Official requirements can change. Use the current documents for your examination year:
# [https://km.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/schule/gymnasium/termine-und-informationen-zum-abitur Kultusministerium Baden-Württemberg: Termine und Informationen zum Abitur]
# [https://www.bildungsplaene-bw.de/,Lde/LS/BP2016BW/ALLG/GYM/E1/IK/11-12-LF Bildungsplan 2016: Englisch Leistungsfach 11/12]

{{BR}}
== Written exam vs communication exam ==

{| class="wikitable"
! Feature
! Written exam preparation
! Communication exam preparation
|-
| Main annotation goal
| build a traceable evidence base for summary, analysis and writing
| build a speakable route through a prompt
|-
| Best codes
| A/P/M/L/E/C as task requires
| A/P/E/C, usually very compressed
|-
| Evidence
| precise quotation or reference plus function
| brief reference, example or data point you can explain orally
|-
| Context
| integrated where relevant to interpretation or task
| one useful link that opens explanation or discussion
|-
| Typical risk
| overmarking and device hunting
| writing a mini-essay instead of preparing to speak
|}

{{BR}}
= Hilfen, Differenzierung und Feedback =

{| class="wikitable"
! Route
! Text / material
! Annotation support
! Output
|-
| '''Support'''
| shorter extract; one paragraph preselected
| A/P/E first; glossary; sentence stems; extra time
| one evidence–function sentence
|-
| '''Core'''
| unseen complex paragraph or multimodal source
| full APMLEC 6×2; dictionary ladder
| one analytical paragraph or 60-second response
|-
| '''LF Stretch'''
| longer or linked materials with ambiguity
| no preselected lines; justify every kept mark
| differentiated analysis with independent material link and AFB II/III transfer
|}

Differentiate further by language, amount, pace, analytical depth and support: reduce the number of lenses before reducing the intellectual demand.

{{BR}}
== Feedback protocol: Keep – Cut – Connect ==

[[Datei:Checklist-icon.svg|300px|rahmenlos|center]]

# '''Keep''': Identify one annotation that directly supports the task.
# '''Cut''': Remove one mark that is decorative, redundant or too broad.
# '''Connect''': Improve one note by adding a function or relation.
# '''Next move''': State one concrete change for the next text.

{{BR}}
== Error analysis ==

{| class="wikitable"
! Symptom
! Diagnosis
! Repair
|-
| almost every line is highlighted
| highlighter carpet
| apply the two-marks-per-paragraph default and deletion test
|-
| “metaphor”, “statistic”, “tone”
| label without function
| add an effect or argumentative role
|-
| long quotation
| evidence is not selected
| keep only the phrase that carries the point
|-
| historical knowledge fills the margin
| context dump
| keep only context that changes the interpretation
|-
| summary replaces analysis
| no function link
| add “This matters because...”
|-
| six codes forced into every paragraph
| tool-driven reading
| let the operator decide which lenses matter
|}

{{BR}}
== AI and source checking ==

{{#ev:youtube| https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUL68mSfDeg |500|center}}

AI is optional, never automatic. First annotate, plan and draft independently. If you use an AI tool, use it for a narrow follow-up such as challenging one claim or checking whether you have considered an alternative interpretation. Verify every factual claim and quotation against the original source.

Keep a tiny AI log when AI has materially helped: '''tool – purpose – what you verified – source used'''. Do not submit AI output as a replacement essay. Do not upload complete copyrighted texts, personal data, private recordings, class lists or other people's work. No external AI access is required for this MOOC.

{{BR}}
= Transfer =

Apply APMLEC to different media without forcing identical notes.

# [[Sachtext]]: A + P + E usually carry the line of argument; L explains strategy.
# [[Literarischer Text]]: P + M + L often reveal ambiguity; E anchors interpretation.
# [[Diagramm]] or [[Statistik]]: E is the data point; A is the claim built from it; C checks source and situation.
# [[Bildanalyse]]: P can include visual perspective; M can be a recurring symbol; L becomes visual/formal design.
# [[Hörverstehen]]: note claims and contrasts, not complete sentences.
# [[Sprachmittlung]]: select purpose-relevant information and cultural context instead of translating everything.

{{BR}}
= Folgekurs =

Continue with [[ABI LF - Vom Annotation Harvest zum Analyseabsatz]]: turn three selected APMLEC notes into a coherent, evidence-based paragraph and then into a comparative material link.

{{BR}}
= Interaktive Aufgaben =

{{BR}}
== Quiz: Teste Dein Wissen ==

{{MC}}

'''What is the main purpose of reduced annotation?'''
(To mark only material that can serve the task)
(!To colour every important-looking sentence)
(!To identify as many stylistic devices as possible)
(!To translate every unfamiliar word)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What does A stand for in APMLEC?'''
(Argument)
(!Audience)
(!Allusion)
(!Accuracy)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What does P primarily track?'''
(Perspective and stance)
(!Punctuation)
(!Paragraph length)
(!Pronunciation)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''When is M for motif most useful?'''
(When a recurring image or idea carries meaning)
(!Whenever a noun appears twice)
(!Whenever the paragraph is long)
(!Whenever the text contains a statistic)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What should an L annotation include beyond naming a feature?'''
(Its function or effect)
(!A German translation)
(!The author's biography)
(!A colour code only)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What makes E a strong evidence note?'''
(A precise detail linked to the analytical point)
(!The longest quotation in the paragraph)
(!Any sentence containing a number)
(!A copied dictionary definition)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What is a useful C annotation?'''
(Context that changes or sharpens the interpretation)
(!Every historical fact you remember)
(!A full timeline in the margin)
(!A general fact unrelated to the task)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''Which check best prevents overmarking?'''
(Remove a mark if the answer stays equally strong without it)
(!Use a new colour for every paragraph)
(!Underline all unfamiliar vocabulary)
(!Mark first and read later)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''What must a strong analysis do with evidence?'''
(Explain how the evidence supports an interpretation or function)
(!List quotations without commentary)
(!Replace the operator with a summary)
(!Name devices without linking them to meaning)

{{E}}
<br>

{{MC}}

'''How should annotation change for the communication examination?'''
(Compress notes into a speakable route with a position supports and a complication)
(!Write a complete essay during preparation)
(!Use all six codes in every prompt)
(!Avoid evidence because the task is oral)

{{E}}
<br>

{{BR}}
== Memory ==

<div class="memo-quiz">
{|
|-
| Argument || claim reasoning qualification
|-
| Perspective || viewpoint stance positioning
|-
| Motif || recurring meaning-bearing pattern
|-
| Language || diction tone syntax technique
|-
| Evidence || precise textual or data support
|-
| Context || relevant situational cultural frame
|}
{{E}}
<br>

{{BR}}
== Drag and Drop ==

<div class="lueckentext-quiz">

{| class="wikitable"
! Ordne die richtigen Begriffe zu.
! Thema
|-
| '''Line of argument'''
| Argument
|-
| '''Narrative point of view'''
| Perspective
|-
| '''Recurring threshold image'''
| Motif
|-
| '''Loaded diction and syntax'''
| Language
|-
| '''Short quotation or data point'''
| Evidence
|-
| '''Publication situation'''
| Context

|}
{{E}}

<br>
<br />

{{BR}}
== Kreuzworträtsel ==

<div class="kreuzwort-quiz">
{|
|-
| Argument || Which lens tracks claims reasons and qualifications?
|-
| Perspective || Which lens asks who sees speaks or frames an issue?
|-
| Motif || Which lens tracks a recurring meaning-bearing image?
|-
| Language || Which lens examines diction tone syntax and technique?
|-
| Evidence || Which lens selects precise support for an interpretation?
|-
| Context || Which lens connects relevant situation culture or history?
|}
{{E}}
<br>

{{BR}}
== LearningApps ==

<iframe> https://learningapps.org/index.php?s=Komplexe+Texte+effizient+annotieren </iframe>

{{BR}}
== Lückentext ==

<quiz display=simple>
{'''Vervollständige den Text.'''<br>
|type="{}"}
The first step before marking is to establish the paragraph { gist }.
A reduced annotation uses the operator to decide what to { select }.
The code A focuses on the line of { argument }.
The code P tracks viewpoint and { perspective }.
A recurring meaning-bearing pattern can be marked as a { motif }.
Evidence becomes analytical only when its { function } is explained.
Useful context must be relevant to the current { task }.
Overmarking can be reduced with the { deletion } test.
</quiz>

<br>

{{BR}}
= Offene Aufgaben =

{{BR}}
=== Leicht ===
# [[Annotation]]: Create a one-page APMLEC legend with one English example for each code and no more than twelve words per example.
# [[Leseverstehen]]: Annotate the Northbridge practice text with a maximum of eight marks and justify the two you deliberately did not make.
# [[Wortschatz]]: Build a word-family card for imply, qualify, recur and bias using English definitions before any German help.
# [[Visualisierung]]: Turn one paragraph from your course material into a tiny argument map with only claims, reasons and one qualification.

{{BR}}
=== Standard ===
# [[Textanalyse]]: Compare a dense colour-highlighted version and a reduced APMLEC version of the same paragraph; explain which better supports the operator.
# [[Peer-Feedback]]: Use Keep–Cut–Connect on a partner's annotations without rewriting the partner's analysis.
# [[Sprechen]]: Prepare a 60-second monologue from four compressed notes; recording is optional and should remain private unless all participants agree otherwise.
# [[Schreiben]]: Write one original analytical paragraph from three annotations and highlight only the sentence that performs the function link.

{{BR}}
=== Schwer ===
# [[Materialverknüpfung]]: Annotate two short sources independently, then write three relation notes showing contrast, continuity or tension between them.
# [[Sprachmittlung]]: Create a purpose-specific English note set from a short German source without translating sentence by sentence.
# [[Fehleranalyse]]: Design a before-and-after example that demonstrates highlighter carpet, context dump and device hunting, then repair all three.
# [[Abiturtraining]]: Complete a timed annotation harvest for an unseen complex text and justify your selection using AFB II/III language rather than quantity of markings.

{{:Offene Aufgabe - MOOC erstellen}}

{{BR}}
= Lernkontrolle =

# [[Unseen Text]]: Annotate a new complex paragraph with a maximum of two marks per paragraph, then defend each kept mark by linking it to the operator.
# [[Vergleich]]: Evaluate two annotation sets for the same source by tracing which one more efficiently supports a summary, an analysis and a discussion.
# [[Transferleistung]]: Turn three APMLEC notes into one analytical paragraph and explain where the function link occurs.
# [[Kommunikationsprüfung]]: Convert a written annotation harvest into a speaking card for a five-minute monologic task and explain what you removed.
# [[Quellenkritik]]: Given a claim, a statistic and a source description, distinguish evidence from context and identify what would need verification before use.
# [[Materialverknüpfung]]: Connect a prose source with a visual or statistical source and formulate one differentiated relationship rather than two separate summaries.

{{BR}}
= Lernnachweis =

For a successful learning record, you should be able to show:
# a reduced APMLEC annotation with clear task relevance;
# a short annotation harvest containing claim, evidence and function;
# one differentiated analytical paragraph written independently;
# one oral speaking card that is clearly more compressed than written notes;
# one example of source or AI-output verification;
# one reflection showing how you corrected overmarking, device hunting or context dumping.

{{BR}}
= OERs zum Thema =

<iframe> https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Close_Reading </iframe>

# [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Argument_Map.png Wikimedia Commons: Argument Map]
# [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Critical_Thinking_Skills_Diagram.svg Wikimedia Commons: Critical Thinking Skills Diagram]
# [https://owl.excelsior.edu/orc/what-to-do-while-reading/annotating/ Excelsior OWL: Annotating]
# [https://km.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/schule/gymnasium/termine-und-informationen-zum-abitur Kultusministerium Baden-Württemberg: Abitur information]
# [https://www.bildungsplaene-bw.de/,Lde/LS/BP2016BW/ALLG/GYM/E1/IK/11-12-LF Bildungsplan 2016: Englisch Leistungsfach]

{{BR}}
= Verknüpfte Lernbereiche =

{| align=center
{{:D-Tab}}
'''[[ABI LF - Komplexe Texte effizient annotieren]]'''
# [[Close Reading]]
# [[Leseverstehen]]
# [[Textanalyse]]
# [[Argumentation]]
# [[Erzählperspektive]]
# [[Motiv]]
# [[Stilmittel]]
# [[Quellenkritik]]
# [[Sprachmittlung]]
# [[Abitur Englisch]]
|}

[[Kategorie:Englisch]]
[[Kategorie:Abitur]]
[[Kategorie:Leistungsfach]]
[[Kategorie:Oberstufe]]
[[Kategorie:Kursstufe]]
[[Kategorie:Baden-Württemberg]]
[[Kategorie:Textanalyse]]
[[Kategorie:Leseverstehen]]
[[Kategorie:Medienkompetenz]]
[[Kategorie:KI-Kompetenz]]

{{BR}}
= aiMOOC-Projekte =
[[Kategorie:AI_MOOC]] [[Kategorie:GPT aiMOOC]]
{{MT}}

ABI LF - Komplexe Texte effizient annotieren - Versionsgeschichte

Glanz: aiMOOC über GPT aiMOOC Action erstellt